Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. US to withdraw from NATO under Republican bill

US to withdraw from NATO under Republican bill

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
world
346 Posts 186 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B [email protected]

    Hopefully we can trust the GG this time!

    F This user is from outside of this forum
    F This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #219

    Better yet, stand up for ourselves and when an unelected royal appointee predictably does not side with Australian interests we tell them to shove it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C [email protected]

      In that light, aren't Nato's actions forcing Russia's hands?

      Forcing? No. They're choosing what they're doing. There's plenty of other options for them. In what way were they forced to invade Crimea, and then the rest of Ukraine?

      If you're going to make the "buffer zone" argument, see how that's decreased since the invasion, not increased, so if that was the goal, is was incredibly stupid. Who would suspect invading a sovereign nation would make other nations less likely to join an alliance against you?

      Probably the best option for Russia (not Putin though) would be closer economic ties to Europe. They are their largest trade partner after all. However, Putin wanted to leave a legacy of "restoring the former boarders of the USSR" so he's destroying the nation he's supposed to protect to have his legacy that he won't get anyway.

      P This user is from outside of this forum
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #220

      In what way were they forced to invade Crimea, and then the rest of Ukraine?

      States are always doing things to make themselves more powerful.

      That's what you were taught in school what the US does.

      This book explains how Ukraine is used.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard

      If you’re going to make the “buffer zone” argument, see how that’s decreased since the invasion, not increased, so if that was the goal, is was incredibly stupid.

      Catch 22. But Finland and Sweden were essentially part of Nato by being part of the EU so Russia loses not much and would be much more threatened by Nato in Ukraine.

      Probably the best option for Russia (not Putin though) would be closer economic ties to Europe.

      That's what Russia did.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard

      "In particular, he writes that no Eurasian challenger should emerge that can dominate Eurasia and thus also challenge U.S. global pre-eminence."

      The Ukraine war creates the hate between the EU and Russia that prevents that emergence. Russia would win so much more if it were part of the EU.

      Cui bono?

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • B [email protected]

        You're right, let me rephrase that. The US is the only NATO country with living experience in invading non-neighboring countries with current methods, doctrines and technologies. That's not a simple thing to do and that know-how is extremely valuable if you want to invade someone else.

        A This user is from outside of this forum
        A This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by [email protected]
        #221

        adsf

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P [email protected]

          In what way were they forced to invade Crimea, and then the rest of Ukraine?

          States are always doing things to make themselves more powerful.

          That's what you were taught in school what the US does.

          This book explains how Ukraine is used.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard

          If you’re going to make the “buffer zone” argument, see how that’s decreased since the invasion, not increased, so if that was the goal, is was incredibly stupid.

          Catch 22. But Finland and Sweden were essentially part of Nato by being part of the EU so Russia loses not much and would be much more threatened by Nato in Ukraine.

          Probably the best option for Russia (not Putin though) would be closer economic ties to Europe.

          That's what Russia did.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard

          "In particular, he writes that no Eurasian challenger should emerge that can dominate Eurasia and thus also challenge U.S. global pre-eminence."

          The Ukraine war creates the hate between the EU and Russia that prevents that emergence. Russia would win so much more if it were part of the EU.

          Cui bono?

          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #222

          I never said the US doesn't benefit from the war, though they wouldn't if Russia's invasion went to plan. Russia thought they could walk in and take over. They clearly thought they could take it all and would gain a lot from owning it; a port in the black sea and the breadbasket of Europe.

          Cui bono? That's more complicated than just "who's benefitting now."

          Also, again, Putin wanted to cement a legacy. He benefits most if they were successful.

          However, now basically everyone except Russia gains from it. China, North Korea, and Iran get to have Russia owe them a lot (We'll see how that debt is repaid, though I know there's some particular land China at least wants, but also they love their soft power). Europe gets a significantly weaker Russia threatening them. The US gets to further extend its power. A whole lot of nations get to test weapons (and secretly gain experience) with a new type of warfare.

          We can't look at the past with the understanding we have now and think they knew this would happen though. They made it clear they expected an easy victory.

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • N [email protected]

            Hol up. Didn't NATO guy wank all over daddy's boobs already?

            A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #223

            I thought that was more of a language barrier thing tbh, poor guy probably would have used father or dad if he knew the connatations.

            N 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • E [email protected]

              So is it their goal to turn the US into an irrelevant backwater or what?

              So far they've introduced bills that diminish their own military force, decimated global trading relationships, now they're trying to back out of the final commitments they have left. By the time 2030 rolls around no one will want to be president because they'll have no power.

              viking@infosec.pubV This user is from outside of this forum
              viking@infosec.pubV This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by [email protected]
              #224

              Nah they want to attack whoever they feel like without having to go through a meeting.

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • F [email protected]

                US: "NATO members need to up their defense spending!"

                NATO: "Okay, we'll do it."

                US: "Actually, We're leaving NATO." 🤡

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                #225

                asdf

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • M [email protected]

                  That's fine, just pack your shit and close all military bases in nato countries as well.

                  X This user is from outside of this forum
                  X This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #226

                  Hey, you know how much money they spend on having this bases? Some regions depend on it.

                  On the other hand... I think Trump and his mad posse wouldn't risc being such bigmouths without their Bases in Turkey or Ramstein.

                  Also their level of megalomanic moronity makes me fear that when the USA leaves Nato it would start attacking the rest of the world. Canada and Mexico first. Then they would find "justifications" to raid through middle america and "bring idiocrazy" to south america. Reinstating slavery for everyone that ain't "a good godfearing white patriot"... Because... the white race is superiour and needs Lebensraum.... Oh god, I've heard that shit all over in history class when I grew up in Germany in the 1970ies...

                  Please, anyone stop them now!!!

                  M W 2 Replies Last reply
                  8
                  • F [email protected]
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    oyzmo@lemmy.worldO This user is from outside of this forum
                    oyzmo@lemmy.worldO This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #227

                    Incredible to observe the rapid (self)destruction of US. I'm just waiting for a couple of states to declare independence. Within a 5-10 years USA will be history like the Sovjet Union; it will break down into smaller countries.

                    T C 2 Replies Last reply
                    28
                    • S [email protected]

                      Honestly, the American far-right unknowingly dismantling US global hegemony piece by piece is pretty sick

                      W This user is from outside of this forum
                      W This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #228

                      Between this and USAID I can't say I'm unhappy about it. Of course dismantling imperialism is a good thing, but I also don't understand. The republicans should be all about illegal invasions, bombing civilians, and installing puppet dictators, so they should love USAID and NATO, yet here we are. Is this just incompetence?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • X [email protected]

                        Hey, you know how much money they spend on having this bases? Some regions depend on it.

                        On the other hand... I think Trump and his mad posse wouldn't risc being such bigmouths without their Bases in Turkey or Ramstein.

                        Also their level of megalomanic moronity makes me fear that when the USA leaves Nato it would start attacking the rest of the world. Canada and Mexico first. Then they would find "justifications" to raid through middle america and "bring idiocrazy" to south america. Reinstating slavery for everyone that ain't "a good godfearing white patriot"... Because... the white race is superiour and needs Lebensraum.... Oh god, I've heard that shit all over in history class when I grew up in Germany in the 1970ies...

                        Please, anyone stop them now!!!

                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #229

                        I remember german history class aswell, it might get ugly history seems to repeat itself a lot.

                        X 1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • O [email protected]

                          Just when I warmed up to the idea that NATO was a necessary evil to counter Putin's worse evil.

                          X This user is from outside of this forum
                          X This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #230

                          It also is a necessity to keep the USA from going Putin... Trump wouldn't stop wanting to be a King. As a King he'd work on becoming the Emperor. As Caesar Donald the step to becoming the god emperor isn't that big...

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • E [email protected]

                            This is what I don't get about their plan to take over the US. It won't work because it will cost everyone money, the people they are ultimately beholden to will lose out because of actions they chose to take.

                            As soon as the consequences become apparent interest in project 2025 is going to drop off a cliff.

                            W This user is from outside of this forum
                            W This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #231

                            As soon as the consequences become apparent interest in project 2025 is going to drop off a cliff.

                            I want to believe

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • G [email protected]

                              1000001684

                              S This user is from outside of this forum
                              S This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #232

                              What is your point in the first place, anyway? That you know better than an active officer just because?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • O [email protected]

                                Just when I warmed up to the idea that NATO was a necessary evil to counter Putin's worse evil.

                                K This user is from outside of this forum
                                K This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #233

                                It is but losing the traitor in the assembly is not a bad thing. Now if Europe could jailbreak all that American tech they have in their military gear too, that would be nice.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • ? Guest

                                  No, they are not, get this notion out of your fucking head

                                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                                  #234

                                  Russia's most densely populated, and politically most relevant are is on the European continent. Get that into your fucking head.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • E [email protected]

                                    So is it their goal to turn the US into an irrelevant backwater or what?

                                    So far they've introduced bills that diminish their own military force, decimated global trading relationships, now they're trying to back out of the final commitments they have left. By the time 2030 rolls around no one will want to be president because they'll have no power.

                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #235

                                    Yes. The most charitable interpretation is that people have forgotten the lessons of the 1900s and think that a replay of Herbert Hoover is a good idea.

                                    Last time it took a few decades and destroying countless lives to fix. Hopefully the cost is lower this time.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • F [email protected]
                                      This post did not contain any content.
                                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #236

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      23
                                      • prior_industry@lemmy.worldP [email protected]

                                        And yet the UK is buying more American jets 🤦

                                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #237

                                        Our PMs have been US lapdogs for longer than I've been alive; with a similar both sides issue where all the cunts come from the exact same private schools and social circles.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A [email protected]

                                          I thought that was more of a language barrier thing tbh, poor guy probably would have used father or dad if he knew the connatations.

                                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #238

                                          Partly, yes. But also partly because world leaders have realised that if you don't want the US to fuck you up the ass you need to say nice things to Trump, preferably combined with gifts.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups