I created the weirdest political compass
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@ZILtoid1991 well, according to this, I'll learn Go.
-
@ZILtoid1991 well, according to this, I'll learn Go.
What do you looking for in a programming language? Maybe I can suggest something better.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Curious how you decided what goes where, I'd hardly consider SQL a "Toy Lang" as opposed to a "System Lang"
-
Curious how you decided what goes where, I'd hardly consider SQL a "Toy Lang" as opposed to a "System Lang"
That it's an interpreted language rather than a compiled one. Bytecode and interpreted langs get the Toy Lang treatment. At least SQL has floating points.
-
What do you looking for in a programming language? Maybe I can suggest something better.
I’m sure everyone can suggest something better regardless of what they’re looking for in a programming language.
-
This post did not contain any content.
How are you defining "Obsolete" vs "Nu"?
e.g. Brainfuck from 1993 is all the way to Nu, while D (2001) and Rust (2012) are less "Nu"?
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
It wouldn’t be a good compass if nobody had strong issues with it:
- System vs Toy is not opposed to each other. Should have been system vs abstract or useful vs toy or whatever
- Where LISP? Best language missing makes graph bad
Edit: before people tell me there’s already ‘obsolete’ on the graph, no, there’s loads of obsolete languages that are still useful, and many more new languages that are either built for fun or not used for sad or good reasons.
Edit2: I’m also halfway sure that brainfuck is older than rust (but don’t wanna look it up). But if that’s true your axis mean several things at once anyway and you should feel bad (not really though).
-
This post did not contain any content.
The aim is to learn one fromeach quadrant!
-
It wouldn’t be a good compass if nobody had strong issues with it:
- System vs Toy is not opposed to each other. Should have been system vs abstract or useful vs toy or whatever
- Where LISP? Best language missing makes graph bad
Edit: before people tell me there’s already ‘obsolete’ on the graph, no, there’s loads of obsolete languages that are still useful, and many more new languages that are either built for fun or not used for sad or good reasons.
Edit2: I’m also halfway sure that brainfuck is older than rust (but don’t wanna look it up). But if that’s true your axis mean several things at once anyway and you should feel bad (not really though).
I literally opened it looking for Lisp and dismissed the whole thing when I realized its not there
-
That it's an interpreted language rather than a compiled one. Bytecode and interpreted langs get the Toy Lang treatment. At least SQL has floating points.
So, it's an almost useless dimension with misleading names? Yeah, it's a good "political compass".
-
@ZILtoid1991 well, according to this, I'll learn Go.
I started using Go a few months ago, I'm loving it so far. Simple, gets the job done, stays out of your way.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Yeah, the axes on this are weird, why would the opposite of a systems language be a toy language? And why is Lua, a very popular and commonly used language in tons of stuff, a "toy"? And Lua is a nu Lang? It's older than Java, maybe it just feels newer because each release isn't necessarily backwards compatible?
-
How are you defining "Obsolete" vs "Nu"?
e.g. Brainfuck from 1993 is all the way to Nu, while D (2001) and Rust (2012) are less "Nu"?
Also, what the hell is "nu" supposed to mean?
-
This post did not contain any content.
COBOL is about as far from a "toy" as I can imagine. Almost everything corpo runs on it at some level.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Is Java more obsolete than c#?
-
Also, what the hell is "nu" supposed to mean?
OP probably lived through the mid-1990s rise of “nu-metal” bands like Linkin Park
-
This post did not contain any content.
a lot of suspicuously missing lisps
-
This post did not contain any content.
Why is it missing Haskell?
-
Why is it missing Haskell?
And Perl
