EU considers tariffs on digital services Big Tech
-
How about not letting Google have exclusive rights to the drivers for all the phone hardware?
What exactly do you mean by that? Google is one of the few companies that let you easily unlock their phones so you can do whatever you want with them.
Unlock so you can use whatever phone service provider you want but Google controls the Android operating system. If you don't want Android on your phone and would rather use Linux or another FOSS operating system, it's very difficult, because Google doesn't give up control of the drivers for a lot of phones. If you just want to remove Google apps from a phone that comes with Android, you have to jailbreak it which voids the warranty and jailbreaking can't be done to every phone.
-
The real money is in AWS, azure,GCP. No one cares about your iPad. Tariff the big 3 hosting providers and see how quickly shit hits the fan.
Bonus: It might make some companies move to non-US hosters, making their data way safer.
-
Would probably end the Internet faster than China can cut intercontinental cables. I'm here for it but the fallout would be positively insane.
Of course it would not.
-
Don’t just legalise jailbreak (which was never illegal anyway
), but force device manufacturers to unlock root as soon as they end support for the device.Then they will offer shit support to avoid doing so. Simpler and safer to just make unlocking legit from the start.
-
Unlock so you can use whatever phone service provider you want but Google controls the Android operating system. If you don't want Android on your phone and would rather use Linux or another FOSS operating system, it's very difficult, because Google doesn't give up control of the drivers for a lot of phones. If you just want to remove Google apps from a phone that comes with Android, you have to jailbreak it which voids the warranty and jailbreaking can't be done to every phone.
No, unlock as in: You can install whatever operating system you want. No need for "jailbreaking" on Google phones. They officially support unlocking the bootloader (and re-locking it later as well!). There are many things not to like about Google, but how they handle their phones when it comes to openness is certainly not one of them. Pretty much all other phone vendors are much worse than that (except for maybe a few small ones like Fairphone).
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
You know jailbreaking isn't illegal right? It's the same is removing one of those void if removed stickers, you won't get tech support anymore but who cares about Apple tech support?
It's not illegal but manufacturers are making it harder to impossible. That must be illegal.
-
No, unlock as in: You can install whatever operating system you want. No need for "jailbreaking" on Google phones. They officially support unlocking the bootloader (and re-locking it later as well!). There are many things not to like about Google, but how they handle their phones when it comes to openness is certainly not one of them. Pretty much all other phone vendors are much worse than that (except for maybe a few small ones like Fairphone).
You are talking about phones made by Google. I am talking about ALL the phones using Android and how difficult or sometimes impossible it is to use anything but Android. I am talking about (oranges) a monopoly on phone operating systems. And you are saying what great (apples) phones Google produces.
-
You are talking about phones made by Google. I am talking about ALL the phones using Android and how difficult or sometimes impossible it is to use anything but Android. I am talking about (oranges) a monopoly on phone operating systems. And you are saying what great (apples) phones Google produces.
You are talking about phones made by Google. I am talking about ALL the phones using Android and how difficult or sometimes impossible it is to use anything but Android.
That's not what you were saying. You were explicitly talking about Google. Also, implying it is Google's fault that other manufacturers don't let you install other operating systems easily is pretty bizarre. If you want to complain about that, at least complain about the right companies. Those are usually the phone manufacturers and/or the SoC manufacturers. The SoC manufacturers often times are particularily problematic, since they often do not publish open source drivers at all or in a very limited fashion.
-
This post did not contain any content.
!lemmysilver
-
!lemmysilver
Thank you for voting. You can vote again in 24 hours. leaderboard
-
Not a complete list, but
- Adobe: krita, gimp, inkscape
- Microsoft: linux, libreoffice, codeberg, playstation
- Apple: de-googled android, linux
- Google: de-googled android, tutanota, duckduckgo or kagi, libreoffice
- Amazon: *arr suite for amazon video, little choice for amazon the logistic company
Little choice?
- allegro in Poland
- Otto, Kaufland, galaxus, etc in Germany
- idealo Europe-wide
- aliexpress and co worldwide
- your local retailer
- second hand shops or apps if you are into saving money and/or the planet
-
True. Nintendo is extremely cutthroat with their IP, they like going after emulators and similar.
Which is nowhere comparable to infecting your stuff with malware...
-
Amazon - the logistics company - is just a front end for (and leech on) various drop shippers, lately, anyway.
Amazon used to carry quality guarantees, and have meaningful reviews, but lately the wild West crapshoot of the rest of the web is just as good.
(And at least on the rest of the web I have some idea who I'm buying from, and can avoid them after a bad experience. On Amazon, it got to where there was no way I could tell.)
Aren't drop shippers finished with the recent tariffs, especially closing the loophole of de minimis?
-
Bonus: It might make some companies move to non-US hosters, making their data way safer.
I've switched to Hetzner and I'm super happy. Fuck DigitalOcean and their ever increasing prices.
-
Don’t use tariffs. Legalize jailbreaking and adversarial interop instead. Disregard American DRM.
And legalize piracy of US-created media content such as movies and TV series.
-
Newspapers, magazines, TV, film, movies, broadcasts are all regulated nationally and internationally
The same should be done for corporate social media companies who basically deliver all or most news content and information to people everywhere today.
The current state of the world is like being in the 1900s and only having six major newspapers in the world owned by big corporations and none of the content they publish or share is regulated or controlled.
Why not legalising piracy for media made in the US? Imagine if all movies and TV series were suddenly public domain in Europe...
-
Exactly. Never do anything until you can do anything all at once. If you can't wave a magic wand and solve all problems everywhere, it's best to just keep the status quo.
-
Exactly. Never do anything until you can do anything all at once. If you can't wave a magic wand and solve all problems everywhere, it's best to just keep the status quo.
Or, you know, do two things at once. It's not uneard of for a huge governmental entity to be able to do that.
-
All it takes is a critical mass of users to make their own Facebook. A continental divide seems like a good place.
This isn't as much about the social media platforms, competing with those is relatively feasible. This is more about the professional infrastructure market. Microsoft Azure, AWS and Google Cloud. There isn't really a European competitor there, the US dominates this market. We have a huge trade deficit on these services, which Trump "conveniently" didn't include in his trade war analysis.
