Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Greentext
  3. Anon dates a 19 y/o

Anon dates a 19 y/o

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Greentext
greentext
153 Posts 96 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A [email protected]

    Just for a little context, the minimum age being ((your age / 2)+7) is meant to be "this is the minimum age of someone you can date without it being creepy" (i believe it originated from the TV show how i met your mother)

    If you were born in 1994 you are either 30 or 31. Let's call it 30 for easy math.

    30/2 = 15
    15+7=22

    So anyone who is 22 or older fits the minimum age concept, which is anyone born in approx 2002/2003 or earlier. If you decided to include that, the extra 4-5 years does increase the dating pool quite a bit.

    I'm not telling you who to date, just giving a little context to the math since that's what was brought up in the original comment.

    Edit: Lots of folks chiming in with some really good insight about the history of the math. Thank you all for that!

    Although the historical accounts seem to be math for the "ideal age" in a (probably female) partner and not "minimum age before it's creepy" as it was presented in HIMYM, it's really interesting to see how that equation has been used for over 100 years!

    W This user is from outside of this forum
    W This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #30

    It had to be a thing before how I met your mother, I remember it being a thing during school in the 80-90’s

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • A [email protected]

      Just for a little context, the minimum age being ((your age / 2)+7) is meant to be "this is the minimum age of someone you can date without it being creepy" (i believe it originated from the TV show how i met your mother)

      If you were born in 1994 you are either 30 or 31. Let's call it 30 for easy math.

      30/2 = 15
      15+7=22

      So anyone who is 22 or older fits the minimum age concept, which is anyone born in approx 2002/2003 or earlier. If you decided to include that, the extra 4-5 years does increase the dating pool quite a bit.

      I'm not telling you who to date, just giving a little context to the math since that's what was brought up in the original comment.

      Edit: Lots of folks chiming in with some really good insight about the history of the math. Thank you all for that!

      Although the historical accounts seem to be math for the "ideal age" in a (probably female) partner and not "minimum age before it's creepy" as it was presented in HIMYM, it's really interesting to see how that equation has been used for over 100 years!

      D This user is from outside of this forum
      D This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #31

      No one knows the true origin of the idea but there's a number of examples that predate how I met your mother by over a hundred years.

      The first published example is Max O'Rell in Her Royal Highness, Woman: And His Majesty—Cupid from 1901

      I heard the other day a very good piece of advice, which I should like to repeat here, as I endorse it thoroughly : A man should marry a woman half his age, plus seven. Try it at whatever age you like, and you will find it works very well, taking for granted all the while that, after all, a man as well as a woman is the age that he looks and feels.

      R A 2 Replies Last reply
      2
      • S [email protected]

        OP doesn't understand what cultural progression is. Of course different people gonna do stuff differently as time progresses, the class she was when you where in high school is just irrelevant.

        This is the case where op just has skill issue, and is stuck in the past like a boomer he is.

        L This user is from outside of this forum
        L This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #32

        When you call someone born in the late 1990s a boomer though. It might be "hip" or "trendy" to do. But Boomers were born in the 50s man. Young kids calling adults from different generations "Boomers" just makes you sound like you didn't pay attention in history class.

        L D 2 Replies Last reply
        16
        • allnewtypeface@leminal.spaceA [email protected]

          After that age, the older party is essentially a lottery ticket

          zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zoneZ This user is from outside of this forum
          zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zoneZ This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #33

          laughs in Medicaid

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gradually_adjusting@lemmy.worldG [email protected]

            When did we as a society give up on the "½ X +7" minimum dating age formula?

            F This user is from outside of this forum
            F This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #34

            When we decided to mind our own business and stop moralizing other people’s relationships based on our personal feelings.

            S 2 Replies Last reply
            23
            • N [email protected]

              Wow that actually makes sense.

              But then again, I’m born 1994, there’s not so many I can actually date. I have like 1990 - 1998 available, and they must be an only child or have siblings within that age as well, otherwise the interests are not overlapping enough to spend time together: those younger are TikTok addicted, those older are Facebook-relicts. I’m in limbo where I know all of that but don’t like anything.

              Edit: to those who downvoted, why?

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #35

              The clumsy portmanteau of facebook and derelicts if I had to guess. That one is just dreadful. Go with Facebougoise or something, The Faceborg maybe (I actually like that one), something like that.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Q [email protected]

                I'm 34 dating a 25 year old myself. Which I checked, it passes the "Half your age plus 7" test

                (34 / 2 = 17 + 7 = 24)
                Sometimes I still feel weird about it though

                B This user is from outside of this forum
                B This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #36

                I'm just a bit older, but been there.

                I could never get past it though. I have a daughter too, and it really just takes one experience where they really remind you of your kid and... yeah, I don't think I can do this y'all.

                1 Reply Last reply
                8
                • J [email protected]

                  I have not heard someone say "big mood" in years

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #37

                  Anon's girl is already falling behind

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • N [email protected]

                    Wow that actually makes sense.

                    But then again, I’m born 1994, there’s not so many I can actually date. I have like 1990 - 1998 available, and they must be an only child or have siblings within that age as well, otherwise the interests are not overlapping enough to spend time together: those younger are TikTok addicted, those older are Facebook-relicts. I’m in limbo where I know all of that but don’t like anything.

                    Edit: to those who downvoted, why?

                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #38

                    …those younger are TikTok addicted, those older are Facebook-relicts.

                    You’re being very assuming with people and that’s why the downvotes.

                    Not every person will be “TikTok addicted” or “Facebook-relicts”, you’re just assuming they are which is only affecting your own chances finding someone.

                    Try just getting to know someone first before you start assuming about their interests or what they do.

                    … and they must be an only child or have siblings within that age as well, otherwise the interests are not overlapping enough to spend time together…

                    Who says you have to spend time with your SO’s siblings for any great length of time? Parties and holidays you can get through, but it’s not like you’re going to go live with the family.

                    You and your SO should both have your own friends and hobbies (in addition to joint friends/hobbies). I’m not trying to crap on having a relationship with your SO’s family, just that it’s not mandatory.

                    I feel like removing these two arbitrary requirements would vastly increase your dating pool. I get that people are looking for traits in a potential partner (doesn’t smoke / drinks / poly / not-poly / uses Arch) but the ones you’ve picked are just self limiting

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • L [email protected]

                      When you call someone born in the late 1990s a boomer though. It might be "hip" or "trendy" to do. But Boomers were born in the 50s man. Young kids calling adults from different generations "Boomers" just makes you sound like you didn't pay attention in history class.

                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #39

                      Born in the 1900s? What'd you do before they invented fire? Ride dinos?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • D [email protected]

                        No one knows the true origin of the idea but there's a number of examples that predate how I met your mother by over a hundred years.

                        The first published example is Max O'Rell in Her Royal Highness, Woman: And His Majesty—Cupid from 1901

                        I heard the other day a very good piece of advice, which I should like to repeat here, as I endorse it thoroughly : A man should marry a woman half his age, plus seven. Try it at whatever age you like, and you will find it works very well, taking for granted all the while that, after all, a man as well as a woman is the age that he looks and feels.

                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #40

                        Interesting, though this sounds like it's not supposed to be the minimum age, but the ideal age.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • J [email protected]

                          I have not heard someone say "big mood" in years

                          J This user is from outside of this forum
                          J This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #41

                          i say it al the time lol

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sharkfucker420@lemmy.mlS [email protected]

                            Can't fathom calling a 28 year old a hag 💀

                            R This user is from outside of this forum
                            R This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #42

                            It's a similar joke to calling 30-yos boomers

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            5
                            • A [email protected]

                              Maybe OP could date a 9 year old on the side, to fill the age gap. Or is OP not rich enough to pull that of?

                              R This user is from outside of this forum
                              R This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #43

                              I never considered that the ages stack

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • S [email protected]

                                Just FYI, this rule falls apart after a certain age (in the 60s or 70s).

                                jballs@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jballs@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by [email protected]
                                #44

                                Nah I think it holds up. Bill Belichick, 73, was in the news for dating a 24 year old and it's not only creepy and gross, but also like she's taking advantage of him by inserting herself into his interviews.

                                If he were dating a 43 year old, I don't think anyone would be nearly as concerned.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                5
                                • early_to_risa@sh.itjust.worksE [email protected]
                                  This post did not contain any content.
                                  G This user is from outside of this forum
                                  G This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #45

                                  people both younger and older than me talk like this and I just want to go anywhere else every time I hear it

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  11
                                  • F [email protected]

                                    When we decided to mind our own business and stop moralizing other people’s relationships based on our personal feelings.

                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #46

                                    Exactly, this "rule" is really just equivalent to other forms of snake oil there is. It is baseless and completely made up.

                                    G M 2 Replies Last reply
                                    3
                                    • F [email protected]

                                      When we decided to mind our own business and stop moralizing other people’s relationships based on our personal feelings.

                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #47

                                      What's interesting is this rule apparently originated from the early 1900s.

                                      https://lemmy.zip/comment/21531881

                                      F 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M [email protected]

                                        This reminder me for some reason of how my grandfather cheated on his wife a few years ago and had a heart attack during sex. He's like 80 or so.

                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #48

                                        When you have heart procedures/ surgery, they tell you, "no sex for 6 weeks with your spouse, 8 weeks with anyone else." Theres science backing up the extra strain/excitement of having sex with someone else

                                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • early_to_risa@sh.itjust.worksE [email protected]
                                          This post did not contain any content.
                                          icastfist@programming.devI This user is from outside of this forum
                                          icastfist@programming.devI This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #49

                                          The brainrot is real, even with "old hags". My ex was 3 years younger than me, but she was an avid tiktok scroller. I was often being shown and taught about new "memes" that everyone promptly forgot about by the next week.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          11
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups