What are some examples of 'common sense' which are nonsense?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Apparently some are wholly disconnected, but not all, leading to some pedestrians just standing there through multiple traffic cycles because they read a cracked article in 2010 that said the buttom doesn't do anything. Pressing a second time definitely doesn't do anything but provide stress relief though.
Related is elevator close-door buttons. I hold them down for a long time which seems to work well, but for some elevators it doesn't.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
True enough. And Trump could very well accelerate that with his economic temper tantrums. Still, I don't know what currency BRICS would settle on; certainly not the ruble, not after Putin cratered the whole country's economy. The yuan?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The labor market is indeed regulated by that supply and demand. That is a foregone conclusion. However, that doesn't guarantee necessarily higher wages and thus higher quality of life, proportionately speaking.
That itself is a struggle over whether "general profit", after accounting for wages, is reinvested for the social needs, such as housing, food and water, education.
Assuming that "general profit" (savings) + wages (needed for laborers' means of subsistence) = value created.
And assuming wages are sufficient enough for higher quality of life.
But put into the equation the landlords, the shareholders, industrialists that dominate our world by virtue of owning the property that shapes it, who want to depress wages, if it means more "general profit", and direct their savings towards more capital accumulation
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Bulls seem like they are capable of herd defense, they are kept isolated for a reason. Same with roosters and chickens.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Cows are not a natural species
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Is common sense just an earlier, naive label for confirmation bias?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
What they settle on isn't too important other than it won't be the dollar.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Lol a better example would be "bitch, explain humans" we're the biggest anomaly to this statement. In ecology we refer to our evolutionary perseverance as "survival of the collaborative"
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Fittest for the purpose of being chosen by farmers to participate in breeding.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I view it as a thought terminating cliché people use when they're too lazy ti fully explain themselves. It can be useful for things that are truly obvious, like if you try touching something fresh out of the stove without protection you'll get burned, it doesn't really add anything to bother explaining it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Interesting... if that's true, then you can know what temperature each setting on the knob is.
I wonder if this is true for all electric ranges?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
A key aspect is that it doesn't even require confirmation.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
but they never seem to consider that it’s them that keeps electing those people.
How so?
If one doesn't vote, a slimy politician still gets elected.
If one does vote, in most elections they can only choose from a small group of people who probably fail to represent them, and even if there is a reasonable option, they probably won't win the vote anyway.
The system is rigged, when it comes to voting there usually* isn't a correct option. Our political voice must exist outside of elections.
(I say usually, because a few elections are better than other, but generally speaking at a federal level, it's slime no matter how you vote)
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Huh, these are all common sense statements I would have assumed true. Four our of four, good work!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Good call, I'll start looking out for these!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I don't have evidence, but I have heard there are also times of day when it's automated and when it's manual. So you might need to press it at midnight but not during rush hour. Interesting if true.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Serious question, why? Stress relief of button-pushing? Thinking it might work and that it can't be slower than doing nothing?
I just don't feel any urge to push the button.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
There's no rationality to it. I don't get out my calculator and graph paper to plot out the best possible course of action. I just push the button a few times. And sometimes I push it a few more times.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Surely there's some reward or motivation, whether it's rational or not. Would you feel any different if you didn't do it?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If I didn't do it then I'd be thinking about doing it.
I'll interrogate my inner experience next time I'm standing at the lights, and I'll report back if I discover anything interesting (unless it's really damning information).