Google removes pledge to not use AI for weapons from website | TechCrunch
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
OP please edit your post to put the link in correctly https://techcrunch.com/2025/02/04/google-removes-pledge-to-not-use-ai-for-weapons-from-website/
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Not any more, they don't!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Every corporate pledge ends with "unless we can monetise it".
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
This is not about kill bots. This is about defining you as a terrorist threat to the US empire because you are friends with someone who criticised them on the internet. And they will wait to bomb you until you are home, so your family is also murdered along side you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI-assisted_targeting_in_the_Gaza_Strip
https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/ -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
How about domestic then, we promise not to make domestic killer robots for urban pacification, read control. Unless the domestic population requires it of course. Or we deem it necessary ourselves, or we feel like it. Your compliance with this message is assumed by the act of reading it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Don't, be evil.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Like my organization that pledged to be 100% renewable energy based by 2025 and they promised that right up until early 2024, where it suddenly disappeared from the internal website, and now no one talks about it.
But in fairness they made absolutely zero progress towards this goal in the previous 4 years, so it was pretty obvious they never really meant it anyway.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It feels good to say that I've been rid of Google for a while. They can shove Play Serives and Store too.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Well, that’s….. ominous.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
How is it with notifications and location nowadays? That's my main concern about switching. SafetyNet or dog developers enableing "check if app installed from playstore" stuff?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
something a little more adjusted to their near future
Sorry bud, with Herr Trumpf and Von Musk at the helm of the States, they're in absolutely no danger of being slapped down a few pegs....let alone broken up and made humble. Need a functional government based on the adherence to the rule of law for that. And unfortunately what they have is D.O.G.E. "streamlining" the removal of "woke" at maximum "efficiency."
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Give it a little while, all that'll be left is LLM "AI agents" manipulating stock markets and DMing eachother "Line go UP! BRRRRRRRRRRRRR!"
Until lack of maintenance makes all the power go out. -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
At&t was the most important company in the world. Now, not so much at all. And it happened by pissing off the costumer beyond the point of no recurring business. If you make a good phone, I buy your next one. But if you sell me a phone subsidized by Amazon such that my every moved is recorded and inspected for possible purchases or alarms for authorities, I'm gonna hard pass on your next one. Oh, no next phone? No problem. The cassette died, the CD, DVD, blue ray, all died. Sony used to sell Walkmans and portable radios. Not anymore. Kodak used to sell chemicals, lenses, cameras, optics, etc, not anymore and there are no more manual cameras made in mass production at cheap prices. Similarly, Google will find its end. Now, I don't search by googling. That gives me shit results. I mix chat GPT and general search regardless of engine. I'm keenly aware of being monitored for purchase. I ignore email ads and YouTube ads. I use YouTube without logging in. In short I am less traceable or predictable. Thus I am less valuable. Also I will not buy IOS or Android phones for the same reason. So if I don't buy another device, I'm automatically not a customer for any online-only retailer. Think of your idiot friend or old family member who doesn't give a fuck about a phone... We all used to be like that. We have a phone only to be costumers... A source of revenue for large companies. Once we stop using our phones, then there's nothing to be had from us.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I think I want to read more Sabatini the next weekend. No modernity at all - and plenty of such "pledges" always turning out a lie.
Provided I won't learn a person who went offline almost a month ago is fine (other than severe burnout as expected). The only mutual acquaintance (who is supposed to know their real address etc) hasn't yet read what I wrote them. I've went offline for longer periods of time, but it's still scary.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Agreed, just saying that they're likely to avoid the FO stage of FAFO for a little while. And yeah, they could easily piss off the consumer enough to lose all their business, but to John T. Public, they're still the GoTo for search, ad serve, email, navigation, in certain areas cell service/ISP. Without a strong governmental/judicial boot on their neck and gun to their head they'll continue to monopolise a load of sectors, and will continue to pull money hand over fist for the foreseeable.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'll agree in good faith. Superstitiously, this is is like agreeing to never ever actually winning the lotto. Ah yes! I will never ever become rich or famous.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Drumpf
but I think Google may still get split, though not as thoroughly buttwrecked as otherwise
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Look, we can go back and forth on this until the heat death of the universe. End of the day, we're just two meat sack LLMs practicing a bit of conjecture and hypothesis. For all we know Google might accidentally create a minor black hole at HQ tomorrow and no longer be in anyone's hair by lunchtime. I'll agree to stop spitballing, I hope what you hope will happen happens, but from where I'm sitting we're clearly in the Biff-Timeline, and I wouldn't expect things to go well for anyone but the shareholders for the near future.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Drumpf
Fair enough, I'm not changing it though.
I think Google may still get split
Maybe, or maybe they'll slip a bulging manilla envelope across the desk in the Oval Throne Room and an E.O will make everything go away. They might be forced in other countries to spin off regional business into separate corps, but with how international banking goes the money would certainly still hit the same accounts they always did, and marching orders will still be stamped by the same hands.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Remember when it was "Don't be evil"
Lol.