Workers at NASA Told to ‘Drop Everything’ to Scrub Mentions of Indigenous People, Women from Its Websites
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You should try doing better
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I thought those fucking cretins were supposed to be reducing government waste. How is forcing agencies to paint over murals with positive vibes and update their website to remove magic words a good use of their time and money?
because it's not and never was about that and by the time everyone else realises it will be too late to stop it without great effort
-
literally one hour ago you used the same grammatical synecdoche of inferring a subset of the group by referring to the group noun demonym:
https://thebrainbin.org/m/[email protected]/t/550486/-/comment/4749901
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I am a shit poster, sir
Not a Journalist
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
What happened to indigenous people and women? I swear I saw one just an hour ago so it seems like they still exist. Maybe not?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Janet Petro—the first woman to hold the position since its founding 67 years ago—wrote that diversity programs “divided Americans by race, wasted taxpayer dollars, and resulted in shameful discrimination,”
In 2021, when she was the director of Kennedy Space Center, she spoke at length in an interview about the value of diversity, saying “our commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility has been paramount to mission success.”
The turnaround is giving me whiplash
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
When it is easy everyone thinks they are Oskar Schindler but when it is hard most people are Hugo Boss.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I wish I had the necessary petabytes of storage to at least store an offline copy. I wonder how many disks that would be and how redundant disks you'd need.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Okay, okay, yeah is it bad? Yeah it's bad but listen up libs - Remember when Harris was being reported as focusing on the middle class during her four month campaign? Huh? Yeah. That's why this is happening. And we were right to not fight against this fascist horror with the one thing that would have mattered, our vote. She should have paid more attention to people who have it bad.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You are pissed at another kid, so you find a dog turd near the playground and you throw it his way.
.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Sun-Tzu actually described how this works with soldiers, and how do you work with such gentle material. I'd say his book's parts on psychology are about making a Hugo Boss from a wannabe Oskar Schindler, but if one applies his advice to oneself, one can put different goals.
I also like Marcus Aurelius.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That was a cat. You saw a cat an hour ago. Indigenous people and women have never existed. It's been straight white men since Adam and Steve. Wait...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Here's this from 2021. They say they have about 200PB of raw storage across some 20k spinning drives at the time of writing (with more being added constantly, about 25%/yr), and capacities are mixed from 4TB to 16TB, across 750 servers housed on about 75 racks. I have 6x16TB WD red pros that ran me about $355/ea new with tax, and my bill was a smidge over $2100. Assuming you used all 16TB, you'd need about 12,500 16TB disks, which would run you about $4,437,500 without a bulk discount. How much of that is redundancy I'm not sure, but that's just HDDs, not the hardware to actually run everything between storage enclosures, OS, disks, memory, clustering, etc. They say they say a single copy with 16TB drives would be about 15 racks., but how that breaks down I'm not sure.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Boomers are natural bootlickers, no conviction... She says what gets her a head.
Also shouldnt she be in a fema camp instead of leeching on federal budget?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Any post that starts with "listen up libs" immediately makes me ignore the rest of its contents. Not interested in your MAGA and/or tankie bullshit.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
obviously you are a old and don't understand that liberals are the absolute worst thing in the world next to conservatives. Us kids are down with the leftism now and any Democratic person is a horrible traitor to society which is why we let trump win. You need to read the manga versions of Das Kapital to really get it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Bro. Do you not know what the words "not interested" mean? I wasn't going to read your first wall of text, and I'm surely not going to read that second one. I can't handle the ignorance from bigots.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The middle class also has it bad. A worker is anyone who isnt an owner
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Electoralism is bullshit to begin with. Trump shouldn't have been able to do what he's doing at all. An actual developed society shouldn't be susceptible to fascist takeover, because fascists should be unacceptable in government. And the president shouldn't be able to do anything they want with nothing but good faith holding them back. The American government fundamentally failed a long time ago. If Harris had won it wouldn't have been Trump, but she was far from a progressive and would not have changed the government in an attempt to preserve it against future fascist uprising.
Not to mention her commitment to Israel. Not to mention she was part of the Biden administration, and had a direct involvement in the American government's support for the Palestinian genocide.
Yes, it would've been better in many ways if she had won. But the choice never should've been between a neoliberal conservative and a fascist. America was broken under Biden, too. Not the way it is, nor the way it will be as Trump's kingdom rises. But it's far more nuanced than just "if she had won everything would be swell". And it's weird to point out non-voters as the problem, instead of like. The past 5 decades of American politics. The many many many people who did nothing to prevent this from happening over 50 years. The democratic party itself failed to meaningfully respond to his first presidency.
Yes if the people who had stayed home had instead voted, and voted for Harris specifically, she would be president and the outcome would be better for everyone. Undoubtedly. Like Weimar Germany though the government was already fundamentally broken and susceptible to the rise of fascism. To blame voters ignores the actual reasons that situation even came about to begin with.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Cracking on with the important shit, I see.