Freed At Last From Patents, Does Anyone Still Care About MP3?
-
-
-
At least the shuffle is partly coherent.
-
Are you a baddie?
-
And what's the extension of opus? .opus?
-
-
Thanks, it certainly looks useful.
-
-
-
Apart from my home hifi (which is built around flac) everything i liaten to ia mp3. Podcasts - mp3. Car audio system? Max 192kbps mp3. My phone? Full of mp3.
And I'm sure I'm not alone.
To say mp3 is not relevant anymore is just misguided. -
-
-
-
Always remember that in some places executive just means the dumbest person in the room and most developers won't lift a finger if it means they get to see the owners embarrassing themselves in public.
-
Not OP, but I promise you that I can hear what sounds like digital water being thrown over the cymbals when listening to mp3 files below 320 kbps. Even then, every now and then I hear that sound here and there across whatever record I’m listening to.
I don’t experience it when listening to records, CDs, or cassettes.
My hearing used to be very sensitive. When the whole world was using CRTs, I could tell you who had their tv on just standing outside their house.
-
-
do you think would influence developers to make their projects open source, with more leaning towards copy left licenses? they won't make much money off the code alone anyways, so might as well try to make others not profit either
-
If I juat want one song and flac isnt expensive to buy digitally I'll buy it.
But if they want somethibg like 3€ per song I'd bail and pirate it.
Discogs is only if I really want it the CD and it's out of sale. Else it's usually less expensive to buy it from the official store.But if I had to choose between discogs and ebay, I'd prefer discogs due to more information about the release and condition.
-
I think the first filesystems had flat layout (no directories), but also had different file types for a library, an executable, a plaintext file. Then there were filesystems where directories could only list files, not other directories.
The original Macintosh filesystem was flat, used for about two years around the mid-1980s. I don't think I've ever used it, personally.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_File_System
MFS is called a flat file system because it does not support a hierarchy of directories.
I thought that Apple ProDOS's file system -- late 1970s to early 1980s -- was also flat, from memory. It looks like it was at one point, though they added hierarchical support to it later:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_ProDOS
ProDOS adds a standard method of accessing ROM-based drivers on expansion cards for disk devices, expands the maximum volume size from about 400 kilobytes to 32 megabytes, introduces support for hierarchical subdirectories (a vital feature for organizing a hard disk's storage space), and supports RAM disks on machines with 128 KB or more of memory.
Looks like FAT, used by MS-DOS, early 1980s, also started out flat-file, then added hierarchical support:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table
The BIOS Parameter Block (BPB) was introduced with PC DOS 2.0 as well, and this version also added read-only, archive, volume label, and directory attribute bits for hierarchical sub-directories.[24]
-
2013 Ford, but I know they shared some technology for a while.
