Does anyone remember Third Voice? You could graffiti any website and only people who had plugin installed could see it. Why isn't there a modern alternative?
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Or do they still exist?
-
This post did not contain any content.
This sounds like so much fun! I don't know of any such plugin existing, but I wish it would.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I remember Yahoo Chat used to let you go to a website and then chat with other users currently on that website. It was kinda cool.
But idk about Third Voice.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
I think the answer to why there isn't a modern alternative is under the History tab on that Wiki page.
Fun idea though, I had never heard of that one.
-
This sounds like so much fun! I don't know of any such plugin existing, but I wish it would.
When the internet was fun
-
This post did not contain any content.
Honestly, I know it's not the same, but that's why I have always gravitated towards "news aggregators", basically the sites that bore progeny like Reddit and Lemmy, where you're presented with links to news or random websites and people have their say about it in the comments.
I never heard of Third Voice and truthfully anything that is 100% reliant on a third party app or plugin / extension / mod / etc probably isn't my bag of tea, but still a cool idea.
-
I think the answer to why there isn't a modern alternative is under the History tab on that Wiki page.
Fun idea though, I had never heard of that one.
Easy to police now with AI, if someone gets rich send me some bitcoin im poor
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
There used to be a really niche version of this idea back in the day created by _why the lucky stiff in the ruby programming community. It was called hoodwink'd, at the time it felt like the way of the future, like a mobile underground peanut gallery. _why was doxxed and nuked his online presence before it ever took off
-
Honestly, I know it's not the same, but that's why I have always gravitated towards "news aggregators", basically the sites that bore progeny like Reddit and Lemmy, where you're presented with links to news or random websites and people have their say about it in the comments.
I never heard of Third Voice and truthfully anything that is 100% reliant on a third party app or plugin / extension / mod / etc probably isn't my bag of tea, but still a cool idea.
One of the best thing about old reddit was how often you'd see a post for a news article about some scientific research, and if you went in the comments you'd find something like, "I'm a graduate student who helped work on this research and the reporter completely misunderstood it and their conclusion in the article is all wrong. Here's a link to the original paper, and I'll give a brief explanation of what our research actually found..."
-
This post did not contain any content.
Stumbleupon was kind of like that. Along with being an early type of link aggregator, any website would have its own comment section that was only visible to other stumbleupon users.
I used to enjoy it, and it looks like it may still be alive in some form. But I'm not brave enough to see how shitty it's become. I'll keep my rose tinted glasses on.
-
This post did not contain any content.
The product soon received much criticism by website owners claiming they were trying to externalize discussion. The White House website was annotated with topical jokes. Further issues arose when spammers began to leverage the product, and increased issues arose when cross-site scripting security vulnerabilities were exploited in the product.
-
One of the best thing about old reddit was how often you'd see a post for a news article about some scientific research, and if you went in the comments you'd find something like, "I'm a graduate student who helped work on this research and the reporter completely misunderstood it and their conclusion in the article is all wrong. Here's a link to the original paper, and I'll give a brief explanation of what our research actually found..."
These days that's more common on Lemmy.
-
Pretty sure all these problems can be solved now.
-
Easy to police now with AI, if someone gets rich send me some bitcoin im poor
If it was "easy to police now with AI," then companies wouldn't still regularly have issues with all kinds of code injection on their websites, since literally any security vendor would have implemented bulletproof AI protection for it already.
An AI model designed for moderation could probably block some things, but it would be no better than traditional mechanisms employed by large organizations who's job it is to keep things secure, that still regularly fall victim to these kinds of vulnerabilities. Many of these organizations already use AI-powered tools to police their systems, and they know they're not anywhere close to even being a full replacement, let alone foolproof.
-
There used to be a really niche version of this idea back in the day created by _why the lucky stiff in the ruby programming community. It was called hoodwink'd, at the time it felt like the way of the future, like a mobile underground peanut gallery. _why was doxxed and nuked his online presence before it ever took off
wrote last edited by [email protected]Did they ever ask why they got doxxed?
Edit: wooooosh
-
When the internet was fun
wrote last edited by [email protected]Then Zuck who's incapable of
funemotions found out rage drives more engagement.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
I fear after asking the question, could this be used as a weaponized bubble machine?
-
Did they ever ask why they got doxxed?
Edit: wooooosh
wrote last edited by [email protected]His identity was sort of an open secret in the community, he was a whimsical creative brilliant madman that was very well known, people were curious. Check out Why's Poignant guide to Ruby for a glimpse and some foxes
-
If it was "easy to police now with AI," then companies wouldn't still regularly have issues with all kinds of code injection on their websites, since literally any security vendor would have implemented bulletproof AI protection for it already.
An AI model designed for moderation could probably block some things, but it would be no better than traditional mechanisms employed by large organizations who's job it is to keep things secure, that still regularly fall victim to these kinds of vulnerabilities. Many of these organizations already use AI-powered tools to police their systems, and they know they're not anywhere close to even being a full replacement, let alone foolproof.
AI isn't perfect, and it’s definitely not a magic bullet for security or moderation. But that’s true for every system we use today.
