Argentina's president bans gender-affirming care for people under age 18
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
and has stayed consistent the whole time.
It hasn't. Lie all you want but you had nothing in there about your gender, sex, wants, needs, history, nothing. You simply commented on gender affirming care, then when I pointed out the hypocrisy, you edited it to be literally four times as long.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You're absolutely lying now, I did not edit it to kake it longer.
I literally talked about having a bigger dick as one fo my first things I wrote and added on even before posting.
Pure just lying to make yourself seem better
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don't give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers
Which since talking to other people I leavened of CPP but that's literally health problems so it's deffrnrt.
But, your making up stuff and trying to mold the arguem t so your right.
Ans lastly cause you wanna add it in, yeah I am against circumcision. But keep changing the argument
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
@[email protected]
English-3•"I made those edits immediately after posting my argument. "
You literally just admitted to having edited the comment a few comments back. Can't even keep your lies straight.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You literally don't comprehend stuff, do you? I admitted to going back and fixing my grammar and what not.
Damn your dense.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers
So no healthcare for children, got it. No operations for fat boys with moobs, no circumcisions and since you phrase it that way, guess no medication for any other illnesses either, huh? And the reason for this asinine take is the view that you think that children can simply go to a doctors and command them to give them full gender reassignments.
Your ignorance has been the issue the whole time. You're afraid of a problem which doesn't exist and because of that you want to make life miserable for those you pretend you're looking out for. It's horrific, tbh.
"Making up stuff." Name one.
And now you're spamming typos on purpose to even further pretend like you never edited anything to add anything to your comment, despite there being "edit" and "edit edit" and several sentences with those. Who do you think you're lying to?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Non edit again for clarity and because you can't go back and reread comments
I added the 'edits' immediately after I posted. Went back after starting to argue with you cause I realized I made some grammatical errors cause I went back to reread what I wrote.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Edit: this is even more fucked, but like if I hypothetically had a teenage girl and she came up to me and asked for gender affirming care so she could have bigger boobs or whatever I would never let her, but I’m supposed to allow my hypothetical teenage son decide to have boobs?
Edit edit: If my hypothetical teenage son just wants to be the most alpha male he can be, I’m i supposed to just pump him full of testosterone so I’m a good parent?
Oh that's "grammar", is it? I think you don't comprehend the words you use.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Religion affirming care gets an exception when it comes to mutilating little kids
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Making stuff up?
you added 17 edits and made your arguemt 600% longer <--Lie
your argument changed completely <-- LieAnd I show you how I normally type cause I got big fingers and toye fast and I get in trouble. I go back to fix errors and get in trouble. There's no winnignwith you
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I added the ‘edits’ immediately after I posted. Went back after starting to argue with you cause I realized I made some grammatical errors cause I went back to reread what I wrote.
You added them 20 minutes later. I replied to you 10 minutes before that.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You should have seen the post before I went back ahha
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yes, cause you were the only one I was talking to at the time and I didn't reread until coming back to it later.
I don't understand what's so hard to understand
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So you're pretending those bullshit "arguments" you edited into your comment is "you going back to fix your grammar" and not you going back to add stuff?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
No, it's not a lie. It's a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there's SEVERAL "edit" labels you've added to the original, which everyone can see.
I added the ‘edits’ immediately after I posted. Went back after starting to argue with you cause I realized I made some grammatical errors cause I went back to reread what I wrote.
You added them 20 minutes later. I replied to you 10 minutes later.
You added several sentences. You didn't just "fix typos".
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You weren't talking to me at the time which I was posting to you. How does that make sense to you? That you're "talking to me" before I've posted my first reply to you? How? You can predict the future?
Just stop it man. You're twitching all over the place simply because you're ashamed of having said something stupid. Go off Lemmy and eat something or something. You're tilted.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen. I added all my thoughts immediately. And came back to clarify and fix typos after cause I knew it was a controversial top comment. Especially since it was getting traction immediately.
Congrats on being better technically. Want and award?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You stop it. You're going crazy and writing a novel because you missed some arguments.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You must read horrible novels if two paragraphs of a few sentences is "a novel." Doesn't speak much to your literacy. Which sort of supports my point about you just being ashamed and not being able to say "whoopsie."
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen.
#No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.
Hope you can see that better now than in the previous comment.
I added all my thoughts immediately.
Not before I had already replied to you.