Suggestions for my next distro
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Ubuntu should be able to. They even have some sort of kernel hot patching service I have not used.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
i will add a question to theirs: Why is Fedora not in the suggestions?
i'm only interested in negative criticism, if you please. What made you avoid or stop using Fedora?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Gentoo! Of course!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I have daily driven (a) Fedora(-based distro) ever since I started using Linux. So I'm absolutely biased towards it. However, as Fedora is a semi-rolling release distro that really likes offline updates that involves a reboot, it simply falls flat when it comes to satisfying OP's needs. They would have a very similar experience to their current one with openSUSE Tumbleweed, the very same they actively want to get rid of.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That requires reboots to update.
Nothing against Aurora, I might run my customized version of it new systems, but any system update requires you reboot the device. -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'm using MX Linux AHS on my PC for years, it is my work PC, 40h/week, for 3 years now, 0 problem with it, no systemd, no flatpak, no snap, and using Xfce is so nice
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I never really got on with Slackware, but I might give it another shot...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Three reasons for me:
- DNF can be kinda slow
- Fedora is owned by Red Hat, which is owned by IBM, which is American and also assisted the Axis powers during WWII.
- SELinux was created by the NSA. I know it's FOSS, but I don't feel I can trust any three-letter agency.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Might even be worth checking if https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-hardware has a straight-up fix for the issue.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Fedora isn't owned by Red Hat. It is a community-driven distro which Red Hat uses as a base for RHEL.
And you aren't a paying customer. You can use Fedora without giving a single cent, or any telemetry data, to Red Hat.
Your stance is like saying "I'm not taking this free bread roll, because people I don't like also eat bread rolls." -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If youre coming on Nixos, I have a lot of resources in the bookmarks section here: https://codeberg.org/BlastboomStrice/LinuxPlan/src/branch/main/LinuxPlan.md#nixos-bookmarks
(This was a guide I made for myself in the span of ~4months to transition to linux and I still update it some times.)
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
When I turn it on, it bootloops unless it's connected to power when I press the button.
Have you tried updating your BIOS?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If you can boot from USB, I'd look at Ventoy, which will let you put multiple distro ISOs on a single USB stick and then pick one of them to boot from when you boot up. I linked to a tutorial rather than the project page for a quick review.
It could be that OpenSUSE is contributing to your boot issues, and that one of the other distros may have a kernel and configuration that plays more nicely; Ventoy will help you determine this. It'll also let you play with several distros without having to install all of them, and see if you like one more than another.
If your boot problem is hardware related - either an issue with the hardware itself, or just Linux compatability, then you should stay away from rolling release distros like Arch; while you can configure them to minimize reboots, they're managed in such a way as to expect people to upgrade frequently, including the kernel, which requires reboots. For example, I run Arch and I love it, but I also tend to not upgrade it very often and the longer between upgrades, the greater the chance of something going wrong during an update. It's absolutely the least dependency-hellish distro I've used if you update frequently, but something like Debian is better if you're looking for long uptimes.
TL;DR: use Ventoy and try several distros. If you find that your boot problems persist through several distros, ignore rolling-release distros like Arch, Alpine, and Void, and focus on Debian-derived distros like Debian, Ubuntu, or Mint. Or you can try a Redhat derivative, but I hate RPM with the fire of a thousand suns so I'd recommend that last - still, some obviously insane people like it, and it's an option.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The boot issue is definitely hardware related. The machine doesn't even power on the display before restarting.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That's a good idea. Why didn't I think of that?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Ah, I stand corrected.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Ubuntu or something based on it
I would not recommend ubuntu, specially on this case. System updates, snapd mostly, have gone downhill and it's nearly impossible to avoid reboots for extended periods. Debian seems to be still as solid as it's always been.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedora_Project#Governance]("The Fedora Project is not a separate legal entity or organization; Red Hat retains liability for its actions.")
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Sure, I was just expanding on OP's Kinoite comment.
Aurora can however go weeks or months without a reboot (you don't HAVE to update), so that's still ok.