So proud!
-
Keep trying.
Theres only like 30 comments, you didn't ask a question in all of them right? So find the ones you asked the question and then look to see if you got an answer. It's really not that hard to find if you look.
Ok so starting with the comment you linked: https://lemmy.world/comment/18496795
That one and the next response we covered, and they are responses to questions, but don't include the answer we're looking for.
Moving on to the next time I ask any questions is here: https://lemmy.nullspace.lol/comment/55968
Your response was:
Jesus Christ, you're somehow losing the ability to follow a conversation.
Why are you quoting yourself?
It is sexist no matter the context, I'm not using it against anyone so I'm not a bigot I'm just exampling a bigoted word. You're being obtuse. Is there a way to remove the intended insult from the hard r? No. Can you remove the intended insult from mansplaining? No. So both of those are always bigoted at times you might argue there's some moral reason to do it but that's all ex post facto.
It's sexist. If you need to see me as a bigot to get that across the so be it but you know as well as I do your argument is void of logic.
Is that it? Because if so, that's also not an answer to my question, which, again is:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
-
Ok so starting with the comment you linked: https://lemmy.world/comment/18496795
That one and the next response we covered, and they are responses to questions, but don't include the answer we're looking for.
Moving on to the next time I ask any questions is here: https://lemmy.nullspace.lol/comment/55968
Your response was:
Jesus Christ, you're somehow losing the ability to follow a conversation.
Why are you quoting yourself?
It is sexist no matter the context, I'm not using it against anyone so I'm not a bigot I'm just exampling a bigoted word. You're being obtuse. Is there a way to remove the intended insult from the hard r? No. Can you remove the intended insult from mansplaining? No. So both of those are always bigoted at times you might argue there's some moral reason to do it but that's all ex post facto.
It's sexist. If you need to see me as a bigot to get that across the so be it but you know as well as I do your argument is void of logic.
Is that it? Because if so, that's also not an answer to my question, which, again is:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
wrote last edited by [email protected]https://lemmy.world/comment/18443585
Try again
Ed:
Perfect! So we agree that a woman can, without herself being a bigot/sexist/etc, believe a man is being misogynistic towards her. You also confirmed this is true for condescension.
Lazy, gaslighting or stupid I think you know what my bet would be.
-
https://lemmy.world/comment/18443585
Try again
Ed:
Perfect! So we agree that a woman can, without herself being a bigot/sexist/etc, believe a man is being misogynistic towards her. You also confirmed this is true for condescension.
Lazy, gaslighting or stupid I think you know what my bet would be.
wrote last edited by [email protected]That's still not an answer to my question...
What's the scenario?
Let's try this again:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
-
That's still not an answer to my question...
What's the scenario?
Let's try this again:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
You could have just said gaslighting instead whatever this is.
-
You could have just said gaslighting instead whatever this is.
Dang, I thought you might be done playing your little game, but I guess not.
Since you're accusing me of gaslighting now, lets soldier on, line-by-line!
Is this the line you think is an answer to my question:
Yeah no one ever denied that.
Because that's not an answer to my question.
-
Dang, I thought you might be done playing your little game, but I guess not.
Since you're accusing me of gaslighting now, lets soldier on, line-by-line!
Is this the line you think is an answer to my question:
Yeah no one ever denied that.
Because that's not an answer to my question.
Ya huh, I'm the one playing the games.. uh huh.
i quoted you exclaiming that you got your answer and your response is "that didn't answer my question".
How so crazy person, how so?
-
Ya huh, I'm the one playing the games.. uh huh.
i quoted you exclaiming that you got your answer and your response is "that didn't answer my question".
How so crazy person, how so?
You quoted me exclaiming that I got an answer to this question:
Okay, so if the man is “probably” being misogynistic, that’s enough that a woman can believe they are being misogynistic without herself being a bigot/sexist/misandrist?
Which is an different question than:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
-
You quoted me exclaiming that I got an answer to this question:
Okay, so if the man is “probably” being misogynistic, that’s enough that a woman can believe they are being misogynistic without herself being a bigot/sexist/misandrist?
Which is an different question than:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
Those are the same question the second time is simply you hedging more because you didn't get to use my answer against me.
You're gaslighting or you're dumb. Either way go away, you're not trying to be productive you're trying to be annoying and gross what?! Mission successful you're a troll, good job.
-
Those are the same question the second time is simply you hedging more because you didn't get to use my answer against me.
You're gaslighting or you're dumb. Either way go away, you're not trying to be productive you're trying to be annoying and gross what?! Mission successful you're a troll, good job.
Asking someone for an example of a scenario is different from asking them whether they believe such a scenario exists.
So, let's try this again.
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
-
Asking someone for an example of a scenario is different from asking them whether they believe such a scenario exists.
So, let's try this again.
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
Nah man I answered your question now you're asking for an example because the answer didn't work to your advantage.
You're transparent as fuck bud, this is getting hard to watch.
-
We've done this, you're rehashing your stupid argument again.
Max depth reached.
True or false:
Giving an example of a scenario is a different action from stating that you believe such a scenario could exist.
-
Max depth reached.
True or false:
Giving an example of a scenario is a different action from stating that you believe such a scenario could exist.
wrote last edited by [email protected]That's still not an answer to my question...
Turns out you weren't even asking a question you're demanding an example, your inconsistencies are just stacking up bud.
Forgive me here, at what point in this prolonged attempt to jam your head as deeply as possible into your own ass does this end or is this some sort of masturbatory ouroboros?
-
You doesn't respond to a single one, you insulted me that's called abandoninga position to attack me instead ie: ad hominem.
Nope not at all. I said it's a bigoted word and if you use it as it's intended you're a bigot. This isn't difficult.
Show me the inconsistency.
All the parts you're intentionally ignoring to make your dipshit gotcha point.
Turns out you weren’t even asking a question you’re demanding an example, your inconsistencies are just stacking up bud.
Nice try! I was asking you, via question, for an example.
Which you've, once again, failed to produce. I wonder why that could be...
-
Turns out you weren’t even asking a question you’re demanding an example, your inconsistencies are just stacking up bud.
Nice try! I was asking you, via question, for an example.
Which you've, once again, failed to produce. I wonder why that could be...
Nope you're asking for an example, I answered your question. Two separate concepts boss. Am that aside for like 5 comments you insisted I didn't answer and just now you agree I did answer. Did you apologize for being rude about it? No, why would ya huh?
You're aware I asked you to provide an example before you asked me and you've still not provided it. You first homie, let's see what shit smeared on walls can produce.
-
Nope you're asking for an example, I answered your question. Two separate concepts boss. Am that aside for like 5 comments you insisted I didn't answer and just now you agree I did answer. Did you apologize for being rude about it? No, why would ya huh?
You're aware I asked you to provide an example before you asked me and you've still not provided it. You first homie, let's see what shit smeared on walls can produce.
What did you ask for an example of? I will happily answer the question instead of sending you on an asinine wild goose chase.
-
What did you ask for an example of? I will happily answer the question instead of sending you on an asinine wild goose chase.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Read. The. Comments.
Why do you insist I need to hand everything to you?
Ed: wild goose chase? You have to look one fuckin place, one. Why the dramatics?
-
Read. The. Comments.
Why do you insist I need to hand everything to you?
Ed: wild goose chase? You have to look one fuckin place, one. Why the dramatics?
See, I just want to answer your question, but you just seem to want to play this little game.
Alright then. So ctrl-f of "example" doesn't show you asking me for an example of anything.
Guess we need to start at the top to see if you're using some other words to mean "give me an example of X".
Yeah and I’m asking them to use their definition in comparison, how exactly is saying “he’s mansplaining” substantially different then “dei hire”.
Is it that?
-
See, I just want to answer your question, but you just seem to want to play this little game.
Alright then. So ctrl-f of "example" doesn't show you asking me for an example of anything.
Guess we need to start at the top to see if you're using some other words to mean "give me an example of X".
Yeah and I’m asking them to use their definition in comparison, how exactly is saying “he’s mansplaining” substantially different then “dei hire”.
Is it that?
wrote last edited by [email protected]I don't want to play this game. Do the words "either way go away" in some way express enjoyment or contentment to pursue the conversation? This is why I say you have a rapist mentality.
You're being willfully obtuse or you're an actual moron you're honestly making it kinda hard to determine.
I'll restate this again according to you.
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.
-
I don't want to play this game. Do the words "either way go away" in some way express enjoyment or contentment to pursue the conversation? This is why I say you have a rapist mentality.
You're being willfully obtuse or you're an actual moron you're honestly making it kinda hard to determine.
I'll restate this again according to you.
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.
I’ll restate this again according to you.
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.
Wrong. Would you like me to link you directly to where I defined mansplaining as being "misogynistically condescending"? I'm happy to do that instead of linking to a random comment in the thread and insisting that it's there somewhere.
-
I’ll restate this again according to you.
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.
Wrong. Would you like me to link you directly to where I defined mansplaining as being "misogynistically condescending"? I'm happy to do that instead of linking to a random comment in the thread and insisting that it's there somewhere.
You completely skipped over the go away part so you can play this dumb fuckin game.
Then what's your argument if you agree it's misogynistic then you agree it's sexist at which point what is your disagreement aside from you being apparently generally disagreeable and apparently unavailable to leave me alone.