Is it me or Ubuntu secretly replaces DEB Firefox with Snap Firefox?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's a dilemma; most Windows and Mac users would benefit from that kind of locked-down, idiot-proof format. Even having the choice of multiple repos is too much for them. So while I personally hate it, that's what most people (i.e. non-Linux users) want and need.
I recommend Ubuntu as the beginner distro for everyone, but with the hope that they eventually drop the training wheels and switch to Debian.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Debian testing just isn’t a very good rolling release disto
What makes you say that?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I agree Ubuntu is the easy choice. You can totally find a desktop you don't have to baby sit, but Ubuntu has the marketing to help you find them and feel safe.
I've had no issues with fedora, I've been running it for about a year.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You could compile it from source yourself, and you won't even have to worry about packaging and package managers.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Exactly. But I would go further. I think Linux needs flagship distros with big solid institutions behind them, and it needs us to support those distros by using them. I know this is not an popular opinion here.
I see those flagship distros precisely as Fedora and Ubuntu.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
While I get that, Debian fits that role extremely well.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I think fedora is best for user that want a recent kernel and reasonably fast update cycle (like not a year behind) but are not interested in rolling (for whatever reason ever).
I love rolling and had no issues due to rolling yet
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
How did you get snap on mint?! I once tried it as a noob and mint was always “snap bad! Don’t do this! You will regret” even on try to circumvent it
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I was waiting for this! Debian is great. I used it for years. But IMO it's not polished enough for normies. The website is fugly and the onboarding funnel assumes too much knowledge. The installer, last time I tried it, was glitchy and unintuitive. I think that techies underestimate how offputting even ostensibly minor issues like this will be to ordinary users. Also, Debian has a ton of unmaintained packages (altho I gather that something is being done about this). Debian is fundamentally amateur in the best and unfortunately worst senses. I think a Linux flagship distro needs to be more pro and systematically thought out. For that, it's always going to help to have a big company or organization behind it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That’s why I recommend mint. You have all the benefits of ubuntu but without the corporate stuff. And flatpak instead of snap.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I swear it was the default already installed. Maybe I'm misremembering.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Mint never preinstalled the snap. They package their own version of Firefox. I believe they have an agreement with Mozilla.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Was a kubuntu person for a long time, I haven't really loved the default Ubuntu DE for a while, but that's personal preferences. At the end of the day, use what you like.
I personally like debian (swapped from Kubuntu over time) but keep mint on my thumb drive for family who needs something on older hardware, especially those used to windows it seems to be an easy jump. I love that there are so many options available to people with various levels of prepackaging and configurations.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Maybe it was that i had to install the snap version (or maybe flatpak?) and uninstall theirs, which fixed the crashes. I thought it was a hardware issue for awhile because it was so random.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
This explains situation.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Definitely not you, they absolutely do this with snaps and have for a while. This was the main reason I stopped using Ubuntu.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
From a security standpoint? Not even close. From a software-release validation requirement, not even in the same galaxy. If they look the same, it's only due to Clarke's law.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Debian will have snaps and flatpaks and all the same insecure black-box drek.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's not as up to date as other rolling releases, unlike stable it doesn't get security patches right away, it gets frozen for months during the switch from one stable to the next, and in my fairly limited experience it just has more bugs. It's not bad, but it's a testing branch. It's not intended as a daily driver, and it shows.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
In Ubuntu they are the same.
firefox
version1:1snap1-0ubuntu5
is a deb that literally runs the commandsnap install firefox
in the preinst script. Check line 77 infirefox-1snap1/debian/firefox.preinst
in the source tarball: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/1:1snap1-0ubuntu5There's no magic there.