Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. Mozilla under fire for Firefox AI "bloat" that blows up CPU and drains battery

Mozilla under fire for Firefox AI "bloat" that blows up CPU and drains battery

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
338 Posts 188 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N [email protected]

    So the profit from the for-profit is passed up to the non-profit.

    This is a really common organisational structure and not bizarre.

    There's loads of worthy criticisms to make of mozilla but this is not one of them.

    grapho@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
    grapho@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #250

    Sure, whereupon the CEO alone can receive an 8 figure compensation package. That is not at all an issue to the viability of a non-profit.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jonsjava@lemmy.worldJ [email protected]

      Non-profit isn't the same as not-for-profit

      Take American Red Cross

      They make bank on blood donations. Also, they take in way more than they put out.

      grapho@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
      grapho@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #251

      The red cross fucking sucks too

      jonsjava@lemmy.worldJ 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • B [email protected]

        Well, stupid people want it and they do use it when its shoved in their face. Like how samsung updated and BLATANTLY made their peice of shit AI button TAKE OVER THR POWER BUTTON so when you try to turn off your phone little old granny gets confused that an ai agent pops up and starts recording you. Absolutely infuriating and I wish torture on whoever implemented that shit.

        E This user is from outside of this forum
        E This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #252

        It's not a new updated it's been that way for years.

        U B 2 Replies Last reply
        1
        • grapho@lemmy.mlG [email protected]

          The red cross fucking sucks too

          jonsjava@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jonsjava@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #253

          I couldn't agree more

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H [email protected]

            Arrived in the Idiocracy?

            D This user is from outside of this forum
            D This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #254

            Abominable intelligence

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • E [email protected]

              It's not a new updated it's been that way for years.

              U This user is from outside of this forum
              U This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #255

              Bixby was not llm based, originally, and sometimes updates will rewrite a user's custom settings. For instance, I had a galaxy on which I made pushing the power button three times turn on the flashlight. An update occurred that overrode that setting by deleting it and turned on five presses to call 911. I ended up accidently calling 911 at 3am (accompanied by a blasting alarm sound) trying not to wake someone by turning on the light.

              E 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • M [email protected]

                They in the last year or so added built in vertical tabs , much better hardware support for decoding video on Linux, continue to support manifest v2 and high quality ad blocking. Have increased performance and memory usage.

                In the last 7 years performance is night and day different as is multiple process performance and switched away from unmaintainable old broken addon system.

                They also created one of the premiere programming languages which is making in roads in the Linux kernel.

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #256

                All right, but apart from the vertical tabs, better video decoding, support for manifest v2, high quality adblocking, increased performance, and the useful programming language, what has Mozilla ever done for us?

                maggiwuerze@feddit.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
                19
                • D [email protected]

                  Abominable intelligence

                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #257

                  Absent Intelligence

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • M [email protected]

                    It's also an example of a smaller company trying fight a mega Corp with infinite money, gained via unethical means.

                    People are shitting on Firefox while ignoring what they are up against.

                    I have no solution for their funding issue, what are they supposed to do? Charge for the browser or ads? There's literally no other alternative and I don't know what the solution is.

                    What I do know is that once FF dies and chrome fully owns the web we are well and truly fucked.

                    Honesty it might already be too late.

                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #258

                    They could try asking for donations, while getting rid of the massive drains on their budget.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • M [email protected]

                      That is disingenuous.

                      People underestimate the cost of building a fucking browser, it's not the equivalent of maintaining a array sort app on fucking github.

                      Some random dude promising to "donate from time to time" is not a valid business model.

                      I wish they'd strip down and just focus on the browser, but fund it HOW? Ads? Subscription?

                      The reason a lot of companies are doing AI shit is essentially RD shooting in the dark, hoping something will pan out.

                      You have to do this if you are a tech company and want to survive in the future.

                      It's fun to meme on ai and but that shit is coming and pretending it doesn't exist or has no value simply isn't true.

                      So I ask everyone again, what business model exists for a software company to make money without ads or charging a monthly subscription.

                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #259

                      Some random dude promising to "donate from time to time" is not a valid business model.

                      A lot of people donating, while not spending that money on dumb projects, and worse exectutives is a valid business model. Mozilla just doesn't want to do that, because they care more about their executives than they care about Firefox.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • N [email protected]

                        Calling whatever you like "profit" cant really be rebutted, it's subjective semantics.

                        Yes CEOs are paid lots of money. Why would mozilla choose to over pay staff?

                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by [email protected]
                        #260

                        Are you really asking why would the people at the top of an organization choose to overpay themselves?

                        N 1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • the_decryptor@aussie.zoneT [email protected]

                          a nonprofit owned by a for profit company

                          It's the other way around, the foundation owns the corporation.

                          Still feels like the corporation is the one making decisions though.

                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #261

                          i think they may be referencing the fact that huge amounts of money have been given to them by google?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B [email protected]

                            That's basically what librewolf, waterfox, and a whole bunch of others are. In the same way manjaro and endeavor etc. are opinionated arch installs with spackling, those browsers are opinionated settings-already-selected versions of firefox.

                            U This user is from outside of this forum
                            U This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #262

                            Just what I needed, ty

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • moe90@feddit.nlM [email protected]
                              This post did not contain any content.
                              tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                              tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #263

                              Do you have to enable the feature first? Because I'm on v141 and I don't see this feature. Complaining about a useless and draining feature that you yourself enabled is a special kind of stupid tbh.

                              E 1 Reply Last reply
                              35
                              • moe90@feddit.nlM [email protected]
                                This post did not contain any content.
                                mitm0@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mitm0@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #264

                                Why does Mozilla think we want AI integrated in your browsers ??

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • S [email protected]

                                  It should not be on by default and you should not have to go into about:config to turn it off.

                                  tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #265

                                  It was not enabled by default for me.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • G [email protected]

                                    Isn't the "for-profit" Mozilla Corporation owned by the "non-profit" Mozilla Foundation though?

                                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #266

                                    I don't care. It's a corrosive force that causes them to pay for over priced CEO's and integrate services that nobody cares about into Firefox (like pocket) or that runs against their principles (container VPN's exclusive to Mozillas for-profit VPN).

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A [email protected]

                                      All right, but apart from the vertical tabs, better video decoding, support for manifest v2, high quality adblocking, increased performance, and the useful programming language, what has Mozilla ever done for us?

                                      maggiwuerze@feddit.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      maggiwuerze@feddit.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #267

                                      The aqueducts?

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                                      8
                                      • mika@sopuli.xyzM [email protected]

                                        TBH despite I don't like this specific idea, nor use Firefox directly, I do like the usage of local inference vs sending your data to thirdparty to do AI.

                                        They just needed to do it OPT IN, not OPT OUT.

                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #268

                                        It is though.

                                        F 1 Reply Last reply
                                        15
                                        • tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.comT [email protected]

                                          Do you have to enable the feature first? Because I'm on v141 and I don't see this feature. Complaining about a useless and draining feature that you yourself enabled is a special kind of stupid tbh.

                                          E This user is from outside of this forum
                                          E This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #269

                                          Bro, several users have taken to the Firefox subreddit, this is definitely worthy of being the most upvoted post on Lemmy rn

                                          tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.comT J 2 Replies Last reply
                                          14
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups