Russia could start a major war in Europe within 5 years, Danish intelligence warns – POLITICO
-
No, it's still a fucking lie. Claiming that Putin was somehow "forced" to invade another sovereign country because the US was some kind of boogeyman is purely demented, ass-backwards abuser "logic."
-
You're half right: it's ridiculous because they did start a major war in Europe in the past 5 years.
-
I didn't deny that, so I am entirely right. The point is that the headline is meaningless clickbait.
-
-
but if putin is the only person, that means every country belongs to him!
well, the US now does for sure
-
USA's secretary of defense is already saying that Ukraine should let go of the occupied territories, will not be allowed in NATO and will not get any security guarantees. Basically saying to let Russia win and opening the door for more invasions by Russia.
-
-
Well most of the rare earth materials Trump wants are in Russian occupied territory, or on the border of it.
-
Believe it or not, the U.S. cannot force the Russian military to cross its own border into a third country.
-
-
-
Either France or the UK can easily fill in. Both have nuclear submarines. Mutually assured destruction baby.
-
And a never ending insurgency?
-
-
What are they gonna start a major war with? Their one "functional" 5th Gen "stealth" fighter that has the radar cross section of a Boeing 747 and no replacement parts?
They gonna start shitting out t-34s again like it's WW2?
They have lost the majority of their best vehicles and their trained soldiers.
If nukes didn't exist they would already have been obliterated by now.
-
Anyone insane enough to start a nuclear war may decide that absorbing a hundred or so nukes isn’t so bad when they have hundreds of Cold War era bunkers and thousands of their own nukes.
Russian bureaucrats may think that about the rest of the population, but fortunately even they are not dumb enough to believe in having safety in those bunkers (time passes, things rot, materials decay).
So Russia really using nukes is for a situation where somebody making decisions believes there will be no retaliation.
Considering that throwing your friends and allies to the wolves has become a really common thing in modern world, just like plainly disregarding any kind of agreements or international laws or moral principles, I think such a situation is possible.
And with the cucked way France's foreign policy seems to work recently, and with the too realpolitik-style UK foreign policy, one might imagine a situation where both are not very active.
Also bureaucrats of various countries are class brothers. A bureaucrat, even a German or a French one, understands Putin and Xi better than somebody democratically elected. And Germany is traditionally (last 30 years I mean) friendly with Russia.
No conclusion.
-
Depends on the perspective. Tu Putin it's not a problem, for him people are expandable and cheap. You just write some laws and they grow again in his view. As the land grab is forever.
Your and mine views are non-dictatorish and as such don't apply to Russian imperialism. -
Would you like to tell the whole class how US is responsible for Putty bombing civilians?
-
I think Russia is well aware that if they go to war with the EU, China will backdoor them hard.
-
Time to start working on my Swedish more...
