OpenAI Furious DeepSeek Might Have Stolen All the Data OpenAI Stole From Us
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's a shame that you can't copyright the output of AI, isn't it?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Intellectual property theft for me but not for thee!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Trump executive order on the copyrightability of AI output in 3...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It just gets better and better y'all.
https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/30/deepseek_database_left_open/
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
so? it won't have any effect on china, because last i checked, us laws apply only in the us
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Tale as old as capitalism.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Security? We don’t need no security!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You get a free database, and you get free database, and you get a free database! EVERYBODY GETS A FREE DATABASE
Oprahbees.gif
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Many licences have different rules for redistribution, which I think is fair. The site is free to use but it's not fair to copy all the data and make a competitive site.
Of course wikipedia could make such a license. I don't think they have though.
How is the lack of infrastructure an argument for allowing something morally incorrect? We can take that argument to absurdum by saying there are more people with guns than there are cops - therefore killing must be morally correct.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The core infrastructure issue is distinguishing between queries made by individuals and those made by programs scraping the internet for AI training data. The answer is that you can't. The way data is presented online makes such differentiation impossible.
Either all data must be placed behind a paywall, or none of it should be. Selective restriction is impractical. Copyright is not the central issue, as AI models do not claim ownership of the data they train on.
If information is freely accessible to everyone, then by definition, it is free to be viewed, queried, and utilized by any application. The copyrighted material used in AI training is not being stored verbatim—it is being learned.
In the same way, an artist drawing inspiration from Michelangelo or Raphael does not need to compensate their estates. They are not copying the work but rather learning from it and creating something new.
