'Doomsday Clock' moves closer to midnight amid threats of climate change, nuclear war, pandemics, AI
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I hope this doesn’t come out the wrong way, but I’m curious what AI would be able to do to solve these issues? There are a lot of ways I could see it being used to make plans or ideas, but ultimately wouldn’t people need to trust AI and give it power over our decisions?
Even if AI weren’t plagued with human biases, it’s hard to imagine people agreeing to trust it. People barely trust each other, and we’d have to trust those who program AI not to manipulate it in their own favor.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I mean if the Stargate Project creates Skynet, that's one way to the kind of salvation folks preach about.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
AI is just a reflection of humanity.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah, tbh, it seems like it should be a lot closer to midnight. If things are this bad and we're still over a minute, what's it going to take?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
We don't have AI.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If (or when) we achieve the technological singularity (we aren't even close, current AI is just marketing) they will be able to lay down a plan to fix anything without making mistakes, they will predict the consequences of actions in detail, ours or theirs (some thing are more difficult like a volcano exploding).
Handling is not necessary they could be able to just take it, the only way to stop them would be to cut electricity I guess.
But the thing is not the current marketing term for AI, we don't have AI.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Oh I never knew that!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Perhaps even thrice.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Go to 12 already
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah. To be clear, I don't know if they called it a scale change, but "we need to start considering more, weaker crises because there aren't big ones anymore" was the gist.