OpenAI: Our models are more persuasive than 82% of Reddit users

[usernamehere@lemmy.world]

I’m sure some of it is organic but there have been times when I see a post and read the comments and they are all talking in a way that pushes a similar opinion. Then I see the same post reposted and notice the same accounts using the similar comments if not the exactly same. Often times being overly prepared with links and info dumping like a lot of effort was made to support their opinion. It is very sus.

We may not be able to verify when it is happening but we absolutely do know there are organized efforts to shape public opinion by using multiple accounts to push talking points. And this is done by many different types of organizations, from countries like China and Russia, but also by companies like Monsanto or the fossil fuel industry. It has been happening rampantly for years.

[satans_methpipe@lemmy.world]

Their models are more persuasive than a person and/or older model with internet access. Very impressive. I wager your stock is worth all of the gold in fort knox ($0).

[dayroom7485@lemmy.world]

1. Make up a challenge.
2. Have your AI win that challenge.
3. Report „My AI is the best AI at this challenge!
4. Watch your stocks go up.

Genius.

[treczoks@lemmy.world]

Lets put it the other way round: there are a lot of people in social networks who are dumb enough that them being overtaken by an AI is no real surprise.

[t156@lemmy.world]

Their own older model, no less.

It would be weirder/more of note if their new model was worse.

[will_a113@lemmy.ml]

No need to limit it to only people on social media…

[baggachipz@sh.itjust.works]

OpenAI: our models are 82% of Reddit users

[uncurious3512@lemmy.world]

Hmmm, you're pretty convincing and well researched for a human.....

[goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org]

Do they think that's a high bar?lol