"Source code file"
-
This post did not contain any content.
That explains a lot, actually.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Hey Grok, take this one file out of the context of my 250,000 line project and give me that delicious AI slop!
-
Hey Grok, take this one file out of the context of my 250,000 line project and give me that delicious AI slop!
Just really fuck up this shit. I want it unrecognizable!
-
Is he using the @ of the handle as part of the grammar of the sentence? Have I misunderstood @ all this time?!?
The first @ was silent, duh
-
Ask for all output in brainfuck.
bf was my first thought, but I would think that would be very easy to parse for computers, and hard for humans. So maybe something that's a lot more verbose?
-
On some platforms if you write @username anywhere then it will act like a tag, or notify the user that you mentioned them, or other similar functionality
He's referring to
This is what everyone @xAI does.
Which Elon probably (maybe?) meant to be
This is what everyone at @xAI does.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Regardless of whether it is truly superior (it isn't, but neither is Cursor, if you think about it), it is actually more tedious to “cut and paste” the “source code file” and then paste back the output.
It is far simpler to just initiate a chat within Cursor, allowing it to identify all the files necessary for context alongside the one being viewed.
-
This post did not contain any content.
No one who legitimately knows anything about computing speaks like this.
He’s truly a moron’s hallucination of a genius.
-
This post did not contain any content.
please don’t use grok.
elon is poisoning the air over memphis with exhaust from the generators that he’s using to power it while using drinking water from the memphis sands aquifer to cool it.
please don’t use grok.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Wait so are they using grok to code grok? No wonder it keeps getting shittier
-
What does the office secrete?
Garbage code. Sadly
-
No, that makes them slower because theyre leaning into the wind. You want to try to mostly use A's, because they're the most aerodynamic, and anything else should be formatted as subscript to keep code size down and reduce drag. C should be avoided at all costs because it's just going to catch the wind.
Conclusive proof that D is faster than C, 2025
-
This post did not contain any content.
I do work for an AI centric company and we've used almost every major model in some way, shape, or form.
Grok was so bad on all fronts that we ceased using it completely.
So I don't believe this for one second. I don't even find ChatGPT to be useful for code. I'd probably put Claude first and versions of Gemini second, with no current third.
-
This post did not contain any content.
...They don't use it over API?
-
Modern problems...
Require traditional 1933 solutions!
-
Wait so are they using grok to code grok? No wonder it keeps getting shittier
His engineers swear by it! To his face, at least.
-
please don’t use grok.
elon is poisoning the air over memphis with exhaust from the generators that he’s using to power it while using drinking water from the memphis sands aquifer to cool it.
please don’t use grok.
You're probably preaching to the choir here. lol
-
bf was my first thought, but I would think that would be very easy to parse for computers, and hard for humans. So maybe something that's a lot more verbose?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]How about feeding it a bunch of Twitter source code and asking it to translate into JSON Programming Language? Maybe it'll somehow accidentally hack/exploit itself.
But seriously, no one should be using Twitter or interacting with Grok at all, even just to fuck with it.
-
No one who legitimately knows anything about computing speaks like this.
He’s truly a moron’s hallucination of a genius.
-
This post did not contain any content.
i dont know what source code is, is this a good idea