"China is the future, do you agree?"
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I think you need a hug.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
As if it wasn't like that with USA too
I don't think it'll be as bad as mentioned
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Funny that you link the BBC, given their historical willingness to lie on the subject and continue to report the ludicrous 10,000 dead at Tian'anmen figure that was the sole claim of a British diplomat that fled the square before the PLA arrived, and later was confirmed to have been a fabrication. Hundreds died that day, maybe low thousands, not 10,000, yet the BBC both knows that and reports otherwise. BBC also got caught doctoring images to make China seem "depressing" that they swapped back after getting called out.
Either way, Zenz is a known liar, works for the "Victims of Communism" propaganda outlet, and was commisioned by the BBC to fight China, which he believes is the "Anti-Christ." Moreover, he misrepresents numbers, such as 8% new IUD rates as 80% new IUD rates, to give an idea of forced steralization that doesn't exist.
As for Socialism, I have no genuine clue what you mean by there not being able to be a Socialist state. Marx and Engels both believed in the necessity of a state until global communism is achieved and all property is collectivized, at which point there are no classes and thus no state, only administration.
You don't support Uyghurs, if you did you'd actually care enough to look into your sources.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Why is it funny to satarize a Chinese man as a yellow bear?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So everyone can read and laugh:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_Winnie-the-Pooh_in_China -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Gotcha, depicting chinese people as yellow is funny to you.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Real talk, I take comfort in knowing that the high tech future we were promised at the turn of the millennium isn't dead after all, it's just happening in China
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
In many ways, China already has surpassed the US.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
For sure. However, the PRC is still a developing countrt, while the US is a declining Empire. The US has farther to fall and China further to rise, especially in the next 1-2 decades.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Heh, I think you've just pissed off Welsh/Irish/Scottish people with that sentiment.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
China still has a concentration camp and invaded Tibet. If they keep on doing what they're used to, it will still be bad.
They also support dictatorships like North Korea, and that's also not a good look.
Then there's the whole silencing of Hong Kong, and I don't now enough to say what happened there, so I won't. Just know something did.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The re-education program in Xinjiang seems to have ended already and fulfilled its stated purpose. Tibet had slavery and was semi-feudalist, while the Dalai Lama owned slaves and was working with the CIA. Life expectancy dramatically improved along with many other metrics like literacy rates once the PLA ended slavery and feudalism. For the DPRK, they maintain trade relations with them, the most sanctioned country on the planet and one of the most heavily bombed. HK was a British Colony to be returned to the PRC, and now most Hong Kong residents would rather be integrated with the Chinese economy.
I think you need to investigate more of these topics if you're going to list them off as points.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Still hoping for that future that's borderless and red and queer and bold.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
yeah it’s censored because of racism, that’s an amazingly insightful and smart take! you sure showed that dirty racist what-for, i bet they’ll think twice before posting a picture of a cartoon next time. you’re a really good spokesperson for your political beliefs, and you DEFINITELY aren’t coming across like a child right now!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Do you want to enlighten me about what's funny about depicting a Chinese man as a yellow cartoon bear? Why not a panda? Why specifically a yellow bear?
Why do you think it's censored to begin with?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Tbh, I was shocked. Much as I'm sympathetic towards China, but I still usually look at it through a lens of realpolitik, like, "Of course they're vying for dominance like everyone else, but at least they're doing it through economic development instead of wars, and it's better if there are two major powers instead of one." Maybe that cynical perspective is more realistic, and maybe XHS users aren't a representative sample of all Chinese people, but still, the fact that so many of the replies were so hopeful and internationalist was genuinely moving to me.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
China hasn't had a war in over 40 years.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The near future? Yes. Absolutely. The have the best economic and political system so far, and are now building out their military to step into the role of hegemon.
The far future?
Assuming China can crack down on global coal and oil usage and figure out climate change, they'll be paving the way for communism in a couple of generations. If they can successfully solve these issues, crush the capitalist markets, and still maintain their current level of corruption then communism is inevitable by 2100 at the latest.
This will be the last century of kings and ceos. Either the world ends due to climate change and capitalist greed, or humanity prevails through communism. There isn't another option left.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Well, you're correct that XHS isn't the general population of China, it skews middle-high income, so you aren't getting the full picture. However, from what I've read from many younger Chinese political activists and analysts is that as China is now heavily industrialized, there is a sense of moving out of the over-ambitious optimism of the previous generations to a more grounded, educated, realistic optimism that is genuinely more hopeful as a consequence of its grounding.
China has libs. China has problems. China has struggles. But, by virtue of its position and strategy, the people also take on a generally internationalist character. "Let a hundred flowers bloom," Socialism with Chinese Characteristics is a prediction, more than a description. It's a prediction of Socialism with Ugandan Characteristics, Canadian, Brazilian, etc. That gives a sense of their overall attitude, IMO.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
We'll get there.