Trump gave Europe three weeks to sign off on Ukraine "surrender": MEP
-
I wonder what Putin has on Trump. Pee tape or P-Tape?
-
All they need is donkeys and wounded people to take on the West. Hell, in Iraq there were multi-million$ US tanks being blown to pieces by $30 IED's. Both US and Russia were beat in Afghanistan against goats and tunnels. Not trying to say that Russia is doing fine (they're not) but their technology or lack-thereof is less a sign of weakness and more of a flex. It's almost as if Russia is saving the good stuff for somewhere else, like a geopolitical rival they've had for over 100 years, who are currently destabilized and divided done by the help of Russian disinformation tactics and their own assets in that rivals government, you know...
-
Art of the deal. Plan A is to give three weeks to sign off on the surrender. When they refuse, Plan B starts. Plan B is that there is no Plan B.
-
I'll do you one better: Why did the war in Afghanistan broke out?
-
And I give trump three weeks to vacate the white House and the presidency.
-
What would be the purpose of US support in Europe if not defending against Russia?
The US presence in Europe exists to facilitate US power projection, if we are not stopping Russian advancement then there is no reason for host countries to allow US bases in their territory.
-
It's not like any direct conflict between the US and Russia would be fought with conventional weaponry. It's be a 30 minute nuclear exchange where everyone loses. But they are actually just running out of stuff.
-
Because the coups the Soviets organised turned out to be unpopular.
-
And what was the role of Osama bin Laden in this war?
I'm starting to get real curious what your views are and how on earth the facts fit together in it.
-
Both are evil, though.
Also, why does not voting show support for one side over the other?
Why do you always say "If you didn't vote, you support TRUMP!"?
Why not "If you didn't vote, you support Kamala!"?
What's the determining factor, or are non-voters just people you can blame for whatever you want?
then you are fully on board with what he promised to do when he’s in power.
This kind of delusion is sad among this generation, but I seriously don't expect more from you people at this point. I'd be foolish to do so.
-
Being an American that feels like they no longer have a home, I would like Europe to unleash holy hell upon the US. Do not let this fascicle president dictate what you do for your continent. You were fine before we took over swaths of your countries for their bases, you can be the strong leaders that the West need to fight everything that's going on in your vicinity with Russia, North Korea, and any other rogue nation. I hate to say it, but the US is a part of that sentence as well. The US will not protect you anymore, I have absolutely no faith that the US will step up when you need them the most. Protect yourselves.
-
I think most americans simply feel like they are losing stuff theyve had for a long time, never considering whether they should have had it to begin with.
-
you didn't vote, so you where equally fine with both options. So in effect you voted for the winner, IE Trump
-
If you don't agree 100% with what Trump says you're an traitor. They probably will, rightly fearing for their lives if they don't
-
Ahh, so whoever didn't vote automatically supports whoever won?
Interesting "logic".
-
Trump is gambling with monopoly money.
-
From what I gather, the paradigm is also shifting on that front. MRAP's and such are big, slow, noisy, easily detectable, and most often get immobilized regardless of armor, and all it takes to take one out is just a more powerful charge (in a mine or strapped to a drone). So both sides are increasingly leaning towards more lightweight vehicles, like enduro bikes, ebikes, and even EUC's. Yes, if one blows up on a mine or by drone, there's absolutely zero hope for them, but it limits the casualties to just that one poor sob (and possibly his passenger) rather than a whole dozen in mrap, but the big the pro is that they're a lot harder to detect and chase with drones, while being economically unreasonable to be fought with conventional military weaponry, and have much less footprint allowing them to weave through narrower paths and right through the minefields. The big downside is that it's not feasible to supply tanks and artillery this way, which is why I mentioned that some consider them obsolete already. On the other hand, drones, bullets and food are perfectly deliver-able by other drones. Not humans yet, though, so some will have to make the runs for rotations still, which us where most casualties happen and will continue happening unless something entirely new pops up all of the sudden
-
Cleary its time for Europe to round up, cage up, and deport all Americans and put a wall around Europe. And America will be made to pay for it.
If its a good enough policy for mexican and central american countries' citizens then its a good enough policy for American citizens. They have no right to flee their own collapsing country into Europe, bringing their failed philosophies and neglected personal health with them. Doubly so if they are poorly educated. Many of them are probably servants of Putin and his terrorism, thus terrorists themselves.
Lets try that one on for size. Doesnt feel very good does it, my fellow Americans.
-
I was already boycotting france because their coffee portions are so small.
-
Eh, it's at least hybrid. Classic hard power is the use of the military. That can include garrisoning but usually by force, not by permission.