Anon witnesses excellent security
-
Would be really funny if they still get fucked over because of some fine print in the disclaimer
Or maybe the vendor goes with "take the money and run".
-
This post did not contain any content.
“If you’re not paying for the product, then you are the product.”
The phrase has its uses, but shit like this is what happens when it's taken to the extreme.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Oh my god. My colleagues were making fun of postgres users. They didn't bother doing a Google search.
-
This post did not contain any content.
It's "more secure" because there's a specific company to blame when it goes wrong.
-
It's "more secure" because there's a specific company to blame when it goes wrong.
Security through liability
-
It's "more secure" because there's a specific company to blame when it goes wrong.
Yeah, i worked briefly at multinational japanese motor company and this was their logic. I was hired as a software developer contractor and HQ had rules stating, no open source software, no free software and the one that puzzled me the most no in house executables (WHY THE FUCK DID THEY HIRE ME?)
-
Not just pick up the phone and harass someone but to also have someone to press a lawsuit against if things go really wrong. With free software the liability typically ends at the user which means all they can do is fire the employee and eat the loss. Suppose now corporate paid for it, well now there is a contract and a party that can be sued.
As if the Eulas don’t make it all arbitration?
What software company allows liability for mistakes in a EULA?
-
My previous employer was bought by a huge company. I liked it in the small company, because I had freedom to do what was needed without much questions, and I was trusted to make the relevant decisions and purchases. Kind of a "Costs be damned, get it done in a reasonable amount of time" kind of arrangement.
When we came under the big corpo, we got an email instructing us to list all the software we used/needed, so that it could be added to the whitelist that big corpo worked with. Anything not in the whitelist simply couldn't run.
I gave them the list, but spoke to my on-shore It guy that out in the field we often needed to install something that we didn't need before on short notice, and waiting for a ticket to be resolved for an administrative matter had the potential to stop production.
They found it easier just to make an exception for my work PC. I just had to promise not to VPN in to the office while running "weird" stuff, otherwise the higher ups would get upset.
That's fine. I had my own VPN for only the stuff I needed anyway. I VPNed into offshore production systems on a daily basis. I needed to VPN I to the office once or twice. Plus in my book, the "main" VPN client is what I consider weird software. My shit was basically a wrapper around openvpn.
EDIT: To be fair, the huge corpo employer wasn't unreasonable. It was just so large with so many employees that strct security implementations were needed for IT to have some sort of control. I was technically also IT, but I only dealt with field equipment, so that IT could focus on "normal" stuff. They trusted me to handle my end, they handled theirs, and we usually cooperated fairly well when our systems "met".
"we need this NOW"
> Package I install is immediately black listed by IT, I submit a high priority ticket and I don't hear from them for days, maybe weeks
Like what the fuck can I do
-
This post did not contain any content.
I am becoming increasingly more appreciative of the fact that I have root access to "my" company provided work device.
-
how thoroughly was it followed through? how was ensured that no free beer software was used?
That's a great question. In my experience (15 years at MSPs and several years as a freelance consultant where I'm mostly in house one place but take side jobs) I've been the one who had to make this change.
Some companies are very serious about it. Laptops end up on some device management solution that can tell every program you've got installed and flag anything not pre-approved. Then take away everyone's ability to install outside of device management.
Some companies want to scare the users into compliance but want IT to be able to do their own thing. So they'll install some easily bypassed thing or enroll everyone but not keep an eye on their network to find rogue devices.
Some companies threaten it, pay money for a consultant to put together a plan, don't like the price, threaten to go elsewhere, and the exec who championed it finds a new job while nothing of note was done, but they're sitting on a handful of licenses for software no one is using.
I used to carry a toolkit of free software in portable format on a thumb drive and another thumb drive with a full Linux environment in case I had to do something at the first kind of company.
-
"we need this NOW"
> Package I install is immediately black listed by IT, I submit a high priority ticket and I don't hear from them for days, maybe weeks
Like what the fuck can I do
wrote last edited by [email protected]"Yes, but does one of the existing whitelisted executables fulfill the same function?"
-
This post did not contain any content.
Worked for a company that had a similar policy against free software, but simultaneously encouraged employees to use open-source software to save money. I don't think upper management was talking to the IT department.
-
"Yes, but does one of the existing whitelisted executables fulfill the same function?"
wrote last edited by [email protected]"Have you tried using MS Excel instead?"
*Looks at industrial robotics with a proprietary TPU that needs a firmware update.*
"Yes"
-
Yeah, i worked briefly at multinational japanese motor company and this was their logic. I was hired as a software developer contractor and HQ had rules stating, no open source software, no free software and the one that puzzled me the most no in house executables (WHY THE FUCK DID THEY HIRE ME?)
How were you supposed to test your software if you weren't allowed to create an executable?
-
this is supposed to be more secure because it costs money
It makes blaming someone really easy though and that's all that matters in a corporate world.
wrote last edited by [email protected]So corporations are just The Gang in It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia?
-
This post did not contain any content.
There is an entire sub-industry and probably thousands of jobs being propped up by this stupid way of thinking about software. I can't be mad at it because it pays the bills for a few of my friends...
-
“If you’re not paying for the product, then you are the product.”
The phrase has its uses, but shit like this is what happens when it's taken to the extreme.
Digital security education in schools actually give people brain tumour ffs
-
How were you supposed to test your software if you weren't allowed to create an executable?
You had to go to the balcony to test it.
-
As if the Eulas don’t make it all arbitration?
What software company allows liability for mistakes in a EULA?
Most do, but limited to the amount of the contract.
-
“If you’re not paying for the product, then you are the product.”
The phrase has its uses, but shit like this is what happens when it's taken to the extreme.
The simple exception is free software (free as in freedom). It's really not that complicated.
