DeepSeek AI raises national security concerns, U.S. officials say

[email protected]

They're pissy cause it being open source and more efficient means that it's gonna be more cost effective for people to use. Which is real bad if your company overcommitted to the slop and needs to recover losses.

[email protected]

It sets bad precedent that the owner class doesn't like.

Either way US government will need to either nationalize or break up these mega corps. This can't go on.

[email protected]

Then you should've specified that those were the parameters you wanted. Answers and thought processes will vary based on the prompt provided.

My point is that you can still use creative prompting to get answers you want that should be blocked due to its safety constraints. My point isn't that there's no guidelines to work around.

I'm not an AI researcher nor do I work professionally with AI so I'm not familiar with 100% of the background processes involved with these LLMs but if the question is "can you get Deepseek to talk about Tiananmen Square" then the answer is yes.

[email protected]

I don't understand why you're getting downvoted. Labor laws in China are shit. A ton of people there work way more than 40 hours a week for less money than US Americans get, live on company "campuses", and have suicide nets.

[email protected]

Many people online have been radicalised into thinking they have to be 100% for side A or for side B.

When you put any criticism towards A or B, the supporters go absolutely wild. They will deny any problems with the side they've chosen.

[email protected]

This.

I can easily see the national security argument for people sending queries to CCP-controlled servers (unfortunately people put all kinds of sensitive information into prompts).

Whether people like it or not, that is potentially risky. I don't know if China has blocked OpenAI-hosted stuff, but I wouldn't be surprised if they have for similar reasons.

But attempting any bans the model itself, even when ran locally, would be conclusive evidence that they're doing it just to harm a competitor.

[email protected]

You did something cheaper quicker and it's more efficient it must be bad the US

[email protected]

Other Then experts, whom ever they are, the rest have no clue

[email protected]

Snowden is in exile because he proved that this is not the case. My understanding is they are not supposed to do that with domestic, but data don’t care about that and agencies spying on citizens knew that, and snatched it all up once they left us soils, up in the air, bounced overseas, all justification to spy without a warrant. Nothing has changed

[email protected]

It's not, but I wish it was.

[email protected]

Nah, I’m speaking from the perspective of the US, since the article is about US policy. The decision making is obvious when you’re thinking at a national protectionist.

Obviously privacy violations are bad for the user regardless. Never trust your corporations or government!

[email protected]

When you're living in the imperial core violently genociding the planet to make a quick buck, of course everything is a security concern and opportunity for the MIC to profit.

[email protected]

Unfortunately China is the future of USA and not vice versa.

[email protected]

Stupid users send private keys and other secrets to their AIs all the time. This is a big fucking threat to US global imperialism.

The US trusts OpenAI (even if they shouldn’t) to not send hackers after US companies. They definitely don’t trust Chinese companies to have the same restraints.

[email protected]

And the first two reasons are not even legitimate in theory. Nationalism is a plague destroying the planet. "Terrorism" is a fake word reserved for enemies of the state.

[email protected]

Youa re speaking on behalf of daddy Sam?

Damn boy, is u elite?

[email protected]

This thing has bipartisan support, local business support and seems to be supported by wider general public thanks to scare tactics and lobbying from Meta. I understand that Democrats conditioned their voters to ignore things they agree on with Republicans but they’re not in charge anymore. It’s like the whole country went on a carnival ride, got stuck and are now trapped in this weird loop.

[email protected]

B/c USA has already been doing the same stuff for years now.

[email protected]

The hell are you talking about? It’s right there in the article. But maybe you didn’t read it?

Ad hominem attacks like you are using are a sign you don’t have anything useful to say.

[email protected]

Same with the tiktok ban. How many classified military secrets do we think some regular dude in a trailer in Alabama really has on his phone?

Depends. Are there any military things in Alabama?

agnos.is Forums

DeepSeek AI raises national security concerns, U.S. officials say