DeepSeek AI raises national security concerns, U.S. officials say

[mrnesser@lemmy.world]

You did something cheaper quicker and it's more efficient it must be bad the US

[wraithgear@lemmy.world]

Other Then experts, whom ever they are, the rest have no clue

[wraithgear@lemmy.world]

Snowden is in exile because he proved that this is not the case. My understanding is they are not supposed to do that with domestic, but data don’t care about that and agencies spying on citizens knew that, and snatched it all up once they left us soils, up in the air, bounced overseas, all justification to spy without a warrant. Nothing has changed

[shinkantrain@lemmy.ml]

It's not, but I wish it was.

[pennomi@lemmy.world]

Nah, I’m speaking from the perspective of the US, since the article is about US policy. The decision making is obvious when you’re thinking at a national protectionist.

Obviously privacy violations are bad for the user regardless. Never trust your corporations or government!

[technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

When you're living in the imperial core violently genociding the planet to make a quick buck, of course everything is a security concern and opportunity for the MIC to profit.

[technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

Unfortunately China is the future of USA and not vice versa.

[pennomi@lemmy.world]

Stupid users send private keys and other secrets to their AIs all the time. This is a big fucking threat to US global imperialism.

The US trusts OpenAI (even if they shouldn’t) to not send hackers after US companies. They definitely don’t trust Chinese companies to have the same restraints.

[technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

And the first two reasons are not even legitimate in theory. Nationalism is a plague destroying the planet. "Terrorism" is a fake word reserved for enemies of the state.

[sunzu2@thebrainbin.org]

Youa re speaking on behalf of daddy Sam?

Damn boy, is u elite?

[misk@sopuli.xyz]

This thing has bipartisan support, local business support and seems to be supported by wider general public thanks to scare tactics and lobbying from Meta. I understand that Democrats conditioned their voters to ignore things they agree on with Republicans but they’re not in charge anymore. It’s like the whole country went on a carnival ride, got stuck and are now trapped in this weird loop.

[technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

B/c USA has already been doing the same stuff for years now.

[pennomi@lemmy.world]

The hell are you talking about? It’s right there in the article. But maybe you didn’t read it?

Ad hominem attacks like you are using are a sign you don’t have anything useful to say.

[homesweethomemrl@lemmy.world]

Same with the tiktok ban. How many classified military secrets do we think some regular dude in a trailer in Alabama really has on his phone?

Depends. Are there any military things in Alabama?

[misk@sopuli.xyz]

Which Chinese tech company was forced to sell majority stock to a US domestic business before? I’ve only heard of TikTok which was also deemed national security issue recently.

[lurch@sh.itjust.works]

it's not fully open source. it comes with binary blobs you can't build from source.

[lurch@sh.itjust.works]

it's not fully open source. it comes with binary blobs you can't build from the source

[lurch@sh.itjust.works]

it's not fully ooen souce tho.

it comes with binary blobs you can't build from the source.

[homesweethomemrl@lemmy.world]

And what exactly is the average person sending to China that's such a threat to US global Imperialism?

Am agreeink with these quesiton. Too many US politicians are not great leaders like Putin. And China.

[imfinejustabittired@lemmy.ml]

Are you implying that the US is considering banning deepseek because they are worried the Chinese workers behind it are underpaid or what? How does what you said relate to the issue at hand?