DeepSeek AI raises national security concerns, U.S. officials say

[sunzu2@thebrainbin.org]

Youa re speaking on behalf of daddy Sam?

Damn boy, is u elite?

[misk@sopuli.xyz]

This thing has bipartisan support, local business support and seems to be supported by wider general public thanks to scare tactics and lobbying from Meta. I understand that Democrats conditioned their voters to ignore things they agree on with Republicans but they’re not in charge anymore. It’s like the whole country went on a carnival ride, got stuck and are now trapped in this weird loop.

[technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

B/c USA has already been doing the same stuff for years now.

[pennomi@lemmy.world]

The hell are you talking about? It’s right there in the article. But maybe you didn’t read it?

Ad hominem attacks like you are using are a sign you don’t have anything useful to say.

[homesweethomemrl@lemmy.world]

Same with the tiktok ban. How many classified military secrets do we think some regular dude in a trailer in Alabama really has on his phone?

Depends. Are there any military things in Alabama?

[misk@sopuli.xyz]

Which Chinese tech company was forced to sell majority stock to a US domestic business before? I’ve only heard of TikTok which was also deemed national security issue recently.

[lurch@sh.itjust.works]

it's not fully open source. it comes with binary blobs you can't build from source.

[lurch@sh.itjust.works]

it's not fully open source. it comes with binary blobs you can't build from the source

[lurch@sh.itjust.works]

it's not fully ooen souce tho.

it comes with binary blobs you can't build from the source.

[homesweethomemrl@lemmy.world]

And what exactly is the average person sending to China that's such a threat to US global Imperialism?

Am agreeink with these quesiton. Too many US politicians are not great leaders like Putin. And China.

[imfinejustabittired@lemmy.ml]

Are you implying that the US is considering banning deepseek because they are worried the Chinese workers behind it are underpaid or what? How does what you said relate to the issue at hand?

[heavydust@sh.itjust.works]

Don’t try to revise history

You read wrong.

[heavydust@sh.itjust.works]

They spent tens of billions of dollars already. Of course they don't want cheap competition. That's basic capitalism, nothing pro or against China.

[0liviuhhhhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone]

Unfortunately that's just a danger on the internet. Stupid users are gonna get scammed whether it's a stock trading AI that empties your bank account when you link it or a Nigerian Prince who just needs $5000 so he can unlock his fortune and repay you $100,000.

Even then, what national security upending information does the average citizen have stored on their phone that they're just whimsically uploading anywhere that'll take a PDF? Like I said, I understand restrictions on devices used by government officials for official purposes, but to ban it unilaterally for civilian use as well seems excessive.

[monkcanatella@sh.itjust.works]

The cope is absolutely unreal.

[fake4000@lemmy.world]

What do these blobs contain?

Does the version run locally also censors output?

[lurch@sh.itjust.works]

it's the so called weights. the learned data after training.

they didn't provide neither training data, nor lists of sources, so nobody can recreate it, but them.

[sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world]

It's open source. Trying to block it is futile now lmao

[themurphy@lemmy.ml]

Just like EV's and battery technology. Up to 40% tarrif on some brands.

They are cheaper with more range. The range is literally only achievable through better technology and hardware.

[whostosay@lemmy.world]

An absolute fuck ton