Define fries
-
This post did not contain any content.
Gets plain fries, but gets charged for vodka. Cashier points to vodka line on the bill and says "potatoes", then points to fries and says "potatoes".
-
Mandatory straw man fallacy Wikipedia link.
Idk, does it still count as a strawman if you're doing it to make fun of him rather than make an argument against something he said? I don't think it does.
-
This post did not contain any content.
It depends on what the definition of 'is' is.
-
McDonalds marketing is getting pretty aggressive if they're sending their cashiers to Wendy's...
The cashier is working undercover in order to steal the krappy patty's secret formula.
-
Yes, and animal fluids, et al, are not generally accounted for in the minds of those that consume said products. For instance, are you aware of the "acceptable" volume of fecal matter in "fast food" ingredients?
I'm not going to say I've thought about it but I would expect it's defined for a lot of countries (I'd be more worried if it wasn't deck ed) and I'm going to assume in most cases it aligns with the regulation of fecal matter levels for other foods .. unless a lobby group has convinced the relevant government body that they are mitigating it with some process like bleaching (also not great). But on the whole I would expect fast food meat to have the same acceptable level of fecal matter as mushrooms. Whether the level is a problem is going to depend on your country ..
-
Making fun of someone with an obviously fake conversation is a universal staple, from classroom to a boardroom.
+10 points if you do the voice, - 100 if the voice is a racial stereotype
Do I lose 100 points if I say "merica! Fuck yeah!" When I hear about us news?
-
Mandatory straw man fallacy Wikipedia link.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Isn't vodka made from grain?
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
I find that Jordan Peterson himself is not annoying, but his fans. Even when you give positive feedback that Peterson is actually pretty good as psychologist, as soon as you criticise his sophistry and his intentionally erroneous take on philosophy, his fans will immediately come at you like a horde of zombies. That's what Peterson's fans are: unthinking horde. It is unfortunate that his fans tend to be lonely individuals who feel lost, and Peterson is only too happy to lap it up for his own grift.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Some person was showing me videos of him and telling me he was very smart, does anyone happen to know some good examples to get him to reconsider?
-
Some person was showing me videos of him and telling me he was very smart, does anyone happen to know some good examples to get him to reconsider?
lobotomy
-
This is only missing JP coming up with a completely deranged definition of what fries are that he demands the cashier adheres to (I don't think the vodka applies, that's more making fun of the cashier). And also him entirely dodging the question of whether he likes fries, stating that people have discussed whether he likes fries but he refuses to reveal it.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Obviously fries represent the western civilization. Frying oil is the chaos dragon of woke left that means to destroy the fries, but will instead transform them into something even more beautiful, an entity of culinary perfection. But you would already know that if only you had bought my online course. sob It's so sublime. sob
-
I find that Jordan Peterson himself is not annoying, but his fans. Even when you give positive feedback that Peterson is actually pretty good as psychologist, as soon as you criticise his sophistry and his intentionally erroneous take on philosophy, his fans will immediately come at you like a horde of zombies. That's what Peterson's fans are: unthinking horde. It is unfortunate that his fans tend to be lonely individuals who feel lost, and Peterson is only too happy to lap it up for his own grift.
Oh Peterson is extremely annoying. His preferred style of discussion is essentially an upgraded version of the Shapiro method:
- Throw out an argument
- When this argument is attacked, immediately derail the discussion to talk about definitions
- Whenever it seems like your opponent tries to define something by using a different word, interrupt them by questioning the definition of that word.
It's the idea of platonic ideals but perverted, so that you cannot ever describe things, because to describe you have to use other things to compare them to. Critically, he never uses this argument against himself. His definitions, however circular they are, are unassailable and end up so distorted that he essentially creates his own language.
Take the word "believe". To Peterson, this is defined as "willing to give up your life before renouncing a thing". Who TF uses this word that way?
-
Is it just me, or does anyone else cringe when people make up fake conversations to make a point that didn’t require it.
might be you, bud
-
Some person was showing me videos of him and telling me he was very smart, does anyone happen to know some good examples to get him to reconsider?
-
Isn't vodka made from grain?
Mostly, because it is cheaper and it is allowed, but potato is also an option.
-
Some person was showing me videos of him and telling me he was very smart, does anyone happen to know some good examples to get him to reconsider?
wrote last edited by [email protected]Ask about his Benzo addiction that literally gave him brain damage. Which was what all his doctors predicted would happen.
-
Making fun of someone with an obviously fake conversation is a universal staple, from classroom to a boardroom.
+10 points if you do the voice, - 100 if the voice is a racial stereotype
Racial stereotype. What do you mean?
Imitating an Indian scam call from a scam factory in India having a conversation with you is viable with an Indian accent if it adds to the story.Every time I tell a story of a french person being upset about something minor I always add a french accent to help develop the story.
Telling any story of a cultural exchange with a monotone AI voice isn't really normal.
-
Watching him debate those atheists was painful. His debating technique is beyond stupid.
Yeah I watched the Some More News breakdown and it was certainly something lol
-
He seems to genuinely be trying to understand his emotions. Are there others who equally expose their inner world, especially conservatives? I don't know another conservative person who dares to do it.
Nah, he just got brain damage from his Benzo addiction, and now he can't stop crying even in situations that aren't warranted.
