Microsoft Probing If DeepSeek-Linked Group Improperly Obtained OpenAI Data

[konomikitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone]

[megaultrachicken@lemmy.world]

"Tom, if irony was strawberries we'd all be drinking smoothies right now"

[heavydust@sh.itjust.works]

If I had money to spend, I would get a ChatGPT subscription since they lose money for every account.

[filister@lemmy.world]

The whole startup industry rely on investors to cover for their costs for years, while they work on a loss, in order to obtain a bigger market share. Look at Netflix, Facebook, WhatsApp, etc.

So buying an account you are increasing their market share.

But feel free to use Mistral, Deepseek, etc. that would be better

[photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

Just rent some server space instead and run your open-weights model of choice

[brumefey@sh.itjust.works]

I had a subscription but I barely used it, maybe twice a day with no complex stuff. I don’t get how it’s possible to lose money on users like me.
I finally cancelled because of the price.

[misk@sopuli.xyz]

I’m sure now that OpenAI accuses them of stealing OpenAI will now prove that they have rights to things are being stolen, right? XD

[peto@lemm.ee]

You have to use it a lot. From what I can tell that's their problem, they priced unlimited access low based on some numbers they pulled out their arse and then were all shocked Pikachu face when people used it and unlimited amount.

[jonathan@lemmy.zip]

They don't lose money on users like you.

[mikina@programming.dev]

That's only for the 200$ one, and if you use it constantly, no?

[cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

Use duck duck go ai chat
https://duck.ai/

[tux0r@feddit.org]

So that means that Microsoft will pay compensation to us, right?

[transplantedsconie@lemm.ee]

Chinese company:

Truly, you have a dizzling intellect.

Microsoft:

AND IM JUST GETTING STARTED! Where was I?

Chinese company:

Stealing data....

[chowjeebai@lemmy.world]

When you can't beat em, sue em. It's the American way.

[unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de]

How could it be better when they just stole everything? The fact that its better basically proves that its not stolen.

[ubergeek@lemmy.today]

Are they worried that deepsink too stuff written by others, mixed it up, and repackaged it as it's own?

Well, yeah, that's all AI is. An expensive weighted pachinko machine, that uses human made content, and remixes it.

[no_ones_slick_like_gaston@lemmy.world]

Is it worth it? Let me work it
I put my thing down, flip it and reverse it

[chiliedogg@lemmy.world]

The question isn't whether they've used the same information. It's whether they've faked the process to achieve that 20x efficiency.

Look at it like a dictionary. Writing one from scratch is a huge task, no matter how many other books exist. How do you even go about finding all of the words?

But if other people have already worm dictionaries, you can just use their word lists and go from there.

It's more efficient, but only because it's a completely different task.

[erasmus@lemmy.world]

If I stole from the thief, is it really stealing?

• some Philosopher probably

[aeronmelon@lemmy.world]

“You can’t steal that public data! We stole it first!”

And considering that’s exactly what Microsoft did to Apple with point and click, what irony!