Why was there a pro-Hitler, Holocaust-denying ad on X?
-
-
You know why. We all know why.
-
-
You can and should have spicy reporting while remaining impartial. It takes more work to drum up the evidence, but that's what separates good reporting from great reporting.
-
*that did a Nazi salute.
-
What's up with the username (Nixon Groyper) ? I understand Groyper, but Nixon was a pretty okay president up until Watergate and very much not a Nazi.
I think it would've been funnier if the first name was Brandon, Andrew (Andrew Jackson and the trail of tears), or Franklin (FDR and Japanese Internment).
Maybe it's a serious ad though, but in that case, why pick Nixon?
-
You get 3 guesses.
-
Alphabet and Meta might be at that point soon, with the way things are going.
-
-
Whatever that was the mods were quick to delete it. Almost too quick.
-
The world may never figure this out.
-
Got it in 1
-
Seriously, my first thought was looking forward to the ADL explaining why smiling Hitler denying the Holocaust is not antisemitic since it isnt against Israel or something.
-
*shitheel
-
Meta? Zuck has been extremely supportive of the nazis in power so far
-
He doesn't deny the holocaust. He sees it as a good idea.
-
Your example is bad faith, but I assume you know that already. If it isn't, then I really don't know if I can explain to someone that lacks mental acuity about over 50 years of case law on the subject. There is even more case law on libel & slander, but it sounds like reading isn't your forte. However, if you're capable of reading then I suggest you do so. But go on & pretend to be ignorant, or maybe you really are & if so then come back after you've actually read & studied the decisions by the courts and we can discuss what you think they got wrong.
-
Clearly your emotions dictate any logic you might be capable of someday.
-
Nazis do both at the same time because they lie
-
It's still there
