5 years after Britain left the EU, the full impact of Brexit is still emerging

[email protected]

Prime Minister Keir Starmer aims to improve relations but won’t re-enter the single market, as both sides cautiously rebuild ties.

I get that right now feelings are still raw in Europe and the UK would get a shit deal that would probably undo the (imminently sensible) desire to forget Brexit happened, but Labour needs to be careful they don't follow the US Dems down the same path they took in never codifying abortion. It's more politically expedient to have a persistent bludgeon to use on the other party than it is to fix the mistake, but eventually there are political consequences either way.

[email protected]

I was visiting a friend over there for New Years and the prices, especially food stuff, is fucking robbery

[email protected]

It was fucking stupid then, we said it was fucking stupid then, it;s still fucking stupid. Rejoin now

[email protected]

Going back to the EU with our tail between our legs isn’t going to go down well with anyone so won’t be happening anytime soon.

We’d not be able to reject the Schengen area or Euro so I’d imagine that most remain voters wouldn’t even agree to it.

[email protected]

While I wish it was an option but, barring some kind of catalyzing event, it isn't. Not in anyone-here's lifetime.

[email protected]

With respect, that's not a real thing. The "US Dems didn't codify abortion to use it as a fear tactic to drum up votes" is not a real thing in the sense that it's not a policy, a position, or the statement of any party leaders. I'm sure there are edge cases where a candidate or commentator may have used it that way.

It's an insult that was picked up by many as a truism, but it is not true. There are several reasons why but it takes more than a couple of paragraphs to go into it.

I don't really see the analogy between rejoining and restoring abortion-rights anyway. I think they're too different.

[email protected]

5, 10, 20 - yeah. The effects are emerging for the rest of everyone's lifetime. There are probably future generations who won't notice.

It's just an astounding piece of self-destruction. Much like electing trump. In many, many, very practical and concrete ways.

[email protected]

That sounds high.

[email protected]

Cheaper than I would get it in Illinois where I used to buy weed.

[email protected]

Did you finally make the big move? I know you weren't sure about being able to afford it.

[email protected]

Yep, been here for almost two weeks. But I do need to find a job and soon.

[email protected]

Congrats! We're not dual citizens, so it'll be tougher for us; but we are looking at ways to possibly move there or France.

[email protected]

Good luck! I hear Portugal is a possibility from some, but you do have to learn the language.

[email protected]

Schengen would be fucking great. It also gets rid of the small boats "crisis" as well. The Euro is a small price to pay

[email protected]

I would also happily accept both to go back into the EU personally.

[email protected]

Trade with the EU has become more expensive and complex, with mid-sized businesses struggling the most.

That’s the thing about the tarriffs and the bureaucratic red tape. It actually benefits big buisnesses who can hire lawyers to use loopholes or pay bribes to circumvent the system, while local small and medium sized businesses suffer.

Capitalism is inherently contradictory. If there is no “red tape” then the system lets anyone do anything and everything gets fucked up because the motivator is money and not wellbeing. The more you add red tape, the more power and influence get concentrated into the few companies that have the resources to navigate it, and you end up with a semi-oligarchic system where the power and wealth resides in a few.

No country has been able to properly walk the line. Which leads me to believe capitalism is inherently unsustainable.

[email protected]

I didn't really mean it was ever an explicit position, beyond possibly your Carville strategist types in smoke-filled rooms, but the fact remains that Roe v. Wade was always being chipped away at, in courts and statehouses and law schools, and at several points in the 50 years that it was in effect the Democrats had the power necessary to put up a legislative firewall (see, e.g. Obamacare), but they took no action while reminding voters every election who supported choice. They didn't even have to lie, but there was always a "better" use of political capital, and nothing was done until it was too late.

Labour is in a somewhat analogous situation, in that they have taken power, and they can blame the hardships of Brexit on Tories, and they know the UK is better off in the EU, but they have other priorities. I am fully aware that they need to be prudent, and maybe repairing relationships is meaningful progress, but this could also be tickmark #1 on a ledger called "Times that Labour could have fixed Brexit but didn't."

[email protected]

It surprised me that the royals kept their mouths shut through the whole thing. For once they could have taken a stand about something. If the Queen had gone in tv and said “we’re not doing this” it probably would have made an impact and prevented this mess. Fucking useless.

[email protected]

I always think, capitalism is like fire.

Left unchecked, it will burn everything down.

But properly harnessed, it can feed, heat and transport people.

[email protected]

in the 50 years that it was in effect the Democrats had the power necessary to put up a legislative firewall (see, e.g. Obamacare)

I don't think the Democrats had the uncontested power to put up an amendment or any other pro-women's-health legislation very often in those 50 years. The one time I can think of is the one you mentioned, and they decided to use that power to pass the ACA instead. They had lost the supermajority by the time that was done.

All that "chipping away" wouldn't have made much of a difference if the SCOTUS hadn't been obscenely hijacked and thrown to the Federalist nazis. And all of that was because the republiQans never wavered, never changed their commitment to depriving women of their rights.

In the case of Starmer vis-a-vis EU, I obviously don't know the details very well, but I would think they're not going to be able to have any kind of public discussion about rejoining anytime in the next 5-10 years at the earliest. I would expect there to be some backchannel discussion, but I can't see any real headway being made. Certainly if I was the EU, I wouldn't be interested in talking about it at all. I would think Labour would have enough on their plate just beginning to stem some of the damage that's already been caused.

agnos.is Forums

5 years after Britain left the EU, the full impact of Brexit is still emerging