Flying still cheaper than trains on most EU routes, study finds
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's what we should do:
-
No tax on airline fuel.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Flying receives far lower subsidies and infrastructure spending than rail. The EU subsidises air travel (including said avgas tax exemption) to the tune of around €30–40 billion annually depending on what you include and what you consider to be a “subsidy.” Using similar criteria, rail is subsidised to the tune of €40–75 billion per year. So rail gets a lot more investment despite it serving 16% fewer travel kilometers per year in the EU than air travel.
-
The costs of the platforms would significantly reduce the efficiency of the solar cells.
My point is that planes have the advantage of not needing tracks which come with costs. There are the maintenance costs and the costs of not using them otherwise. We shouldn't be surprised if trains can't compete on many connections.
Well, airports are not free
-
But why though?
Rail is very expensive to build, operate, and maintain. Rail is far more heavily subsidised in Europe than air travel and it’s still more expensive. It also doesn’t respond well to changes in demand. Tracks can’t be easily moved. Flights can easily be redirected. As technology and efficiency improves, flights become cheaper every year. Not rail, however, because most of the cost of operation and maintenance has nothing to do with energy efficiency. This gap will continue to widen. Further, rail has an inherent logistical limitation: all cars share limited lines. They are all limited by the slowest car. They are all stopped when an issue occurs with another car (or tracks). Planes can fly around damage to the network.
-
Do you have any numbers?
In France, airfrance stopped to fly some routes since they cannot make them cheaper than a TGV
-
This post did not contain any content.
It is absolutely not OK that there still is a tax exemption on any flight whatsoever.
That and the shameless dynamic pricing of trains.
-
Hell, it’s cheaper and faster to fly from Zurich or Munich to Hamburg via Barcelona, London or Dublin.
Cheaper maybe, but I don't bet on faster for the passenger. Train station normally are in the city center (or really near), airport are relatively far from the city.
