Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Selfhosted
  3. Securely Expose your Homelab Services with Mutual TLS - YouTube

Securely Expose your Homelab Services with Mutual TLS - YouTube

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Selfhosted
selfhosted
24 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N [email protected]

    I set my caddy reverse proxy to only accept request from localhost.

    It is a bit more involved but you can actually get a proper cert for localhost stuff, with your domain pointing to an internal ip addr and not risk exposing your public ip and having to open a port.

    D This user is from outside of this forum
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    Signed by a AC?

    I had a lot of issues with some apps not allowing self-signed certificates and the app used their own list of allowed AC or something, I was unable to make it allow my own certificates even adding my own root certificate to Android.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D [email protected]

      Signed by a AC?

      I had a lot of issues with some apps not allowing self-signed certificates and the app used their own list of allowed AC or something, I was unable to make it allow my own certificates even adding my own root certificate to Android.

      N This user is from outside of this forum
      N This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #22

      No, signed by Let's Encrypt, a proper, real cert. https://gist.github.com/jkelin/fc04b081ed19910618770c6be998de0e

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • netrunner@programming.devN [email protected]

        The whole point of mTLS is that you dont need to use a VPN to achieve that same security.

        W This user is from outside of this forum
        W This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #23

        that's not that same security. an observer will still know that you are connecting over HTTPS to a particular doman/IP, maybe they can also deduce that you are using mTLS, and all your other traffic is not protected by it at all. all the while with wireguard, they can see that it's wireguard traffic, and where it goes, but anything inside is secret, plus if an app uses unencrypted traffic for some reason (smb, dns, custom and special protocols), wireguard will hide and protect that too.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N [email protected]

          mTLS is so cool, until you find out that almost no clients support it.

          W This user is from outside of this forum
          W This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #24

          Immich supports it.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups