Anonymous: Trump is making America weaker and we’ll exploit it - News Cafe
-
Memory safety is just a small part of infrastructure resilience. Rust doesn't protect you from phishing attacks. Rust doesn't protect you from weak passwords. Rust doesn't protect you from network misconfiguration. (For that matter, Rust doesn't protect you from some group of twenty-year old assholes installing their own servers inside your network, like you say.) Protecting your estate is not just about a programming language.
"Infrastructure", to me, suggests power, water, oil and food, more than some random website. For US infra, I'm thinking a lot of Allen-Bradley programmable logic controllers, but probably a lot of Siemens and Mitsubishi stuff as well - things like these: https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/products/hardware/allen-bradley/programmable-controllers.html.
Historically, the controllers for industrial infrastructure (from a single pumping station to critical electrical distribution) have been on their own separate networks, and so things like secure passwords and infrastructure updates haven't been a priority. Some of these things have been running untouched for decades; thousands of people will have used the (often shared) credentials, which are very rarely updated or changed. The recent change is to demand more visibility and interaction; every SCADA (the main control computer used for interactive plant control) that you bring onto the public internet so that you can see what it's up to in a central hub, the more opportunity you have to mess up the network security and allow undesirables in.
PLCs tend to be coded up in "ladder logic" and compiled to device-specific assembly language. It isn't a programming environment where C has made any inroads over the decades; I very much doubt there's a Rust compiler for some random microcontroller, and "supported by manufacturer" is critical for these industries.
-
::: spoiler Spoiler
You've been watching too much Mr. Robot.
::: -
The whole point is to being attention to the rise of fascism. Hacking without releasing a statement like this is just terrorism. Releasing a statement after hacking can make it easier for the govt to cover up, like "no we weren't hacked, someone in our server room just accidentally tripped over a power cable"
-
DEI
Donald, Eric and Ivana?
-
Hacker fashion tip: while wearing your guy fox mask, match it with a Luigi hat.
-
Take my upvote!!!
-
Just brush the Funyun crumbs off of your shirt before starting.
-
Attacking twitter would be more useful than deleting all debt? I mean go wild, take that shit ass site down but if you had a "delete twitter" button and a "delete all debt" button, mashing the second one would make you the greatest hero who ever lived.
-
If the government cant handle "online stuff" they can pitch privatization.
It kind of already is privatized. Most of the government's cyber security efforts are handled by defense contractors.
-
Ceo residences would do better. Force them all to live in the office hellscape they created.
-
It's partly due to fsociety actions that things ended like they did. I remember it being actually worse than how it was before
-
FORTRAN could be said to be security through obscurity though /s
-
Aren’t they kind of notorious for empty promises?
-
The Guy Faux mask is so 2005.
-
Debt is monitored/store by many different companies
Even if you took down all data of x health insurance company it would still exist in other places
So I would say that it poses a bigger challenge and you would have to do it at roughly the same time
-
This guy fawks
-
You're right, What if they publish cheat codes for all Steam games, thus freeing humanity from corporate exploitation???!!!
-
Its more of a chaos entity. Because anyone can be a part of it with literally no steps other than saying "I am Anonymous", anyone can say or do anything. As a result, one person or group may claim Anonymous while doing a legitimate hack, while another person who is just a script kiddie won't ever actually do anything and you get this hot and cold, will they won't they effect as a result.
-
My final semester in American Sign Language was "Sex, Drugs, and Profanity," and most of the signs are just exactly what you'd guess. Plus, facial expressions are a big part of the grammar of the language. I don't recognize this, but assuming it's from a comedy - it's probably also not far off from accurate.
-
It's from the 1982 film Airplane 2: the Sequel. Nowhere near as funny as the original, but still very funny.
