Anonymous: Trump is making America weaker and we’ll exploit it - News Cafe
-
I think the guy you're thinking of Fox Mulder
-
Sounds like ISIS. Lots of people claiming to be members.
-
Go vandalize Tom Tillis' website. That'll be your first test.
-
Anonymous isn’t meaningless; it’s amorphous, which is the whole point. It’s not a movement or a name—it’s a void anyone can step into, wielding chaos as a weapon. That terrifies institutions built on predictability. Sure, it’s messy, but dismissing it outright ignores its potential to disrupt systems that thrive on control.
The emphasis wasn’t overused; it was deliberate. The propaganda circus? Real. Tech oligarchs colluding with politicians? Also real. If calling that out feels unhinged, maybe it’s because the world is unhinged, and pretending otherwise is the real insanity. Tinfoil hats? No. Just tired of people mistaking cynicism for clarity while the trash barge burns.
If that makes me sound mentally unwell, fine. At least I’m awake enough to notice the fire.
-
CISA actually monitored Internet traffic and would contact government entities (local, schools, universities, etc) when they were being attacked. I went to a talk once where they said they usually had response times in minutes, and it would take longer to figure out who they needed to alert and convince them that it was real. Now that CISA is gutted I would expect more and worse breaches in the future.
-
Anytime I see something about "Anonymous" I just assume it's some kind of fed psyop until proven otherwise.
-
No one is innocent here.
-
So you'll go to your grave believing it because all the proof in the world will just be fake news
-
In this case? Yeah, probably. If there was proof of their identity they would no longer be anonymous, would they?
It's a much more reasonable assumption than how your lot assumes anyone who disagrees with you for any reason is a Russian bot, and can't be convinced by any amount of proof otherwise.
-
Ikr. Doing that with the richest man instead does not seem to have the same effect.
-
I mean at least you're leaning into the conservative conspiracy hole instead of pretending you're not in it, so bonus points for honesty.
-
Lmao, "conservative conspiracy hole." I guess "being suspicious of anonymous sources" makes me a conservative conspiracy theorist, somehow
-
"This thing I don't understand is a government psyop and I will refuse to believe any evidence to the contrary"
That's literally Maga 101 you can't be surprised I called a spade a spade. Plus I just happe to know you're already conservative from your other posts so it's just more evidence to back it up.
-
This thing I don’t understand
What don't I understand about it?
I will refuse to believe any evidence to the contrary
There is no evidence to the contrary. The only way there could be would be if they got caught.
Plus I just happe to know you’re already conservative from your other posts so it’s just more evidence to back it up.
Lmao of course you do.
As I always say, "If someone claims something happened on the fediverse without providing a link, they’re lying." Please cite any evidence at all that I'm conservative.
-
full name of loris?
-
It's not a whoosh if you mention the possibility of them trolling
-
Lol this is hilarious. I don't know which "anonymous" they spoke to, but it definitely wasn't the actual subversionist hackers that know how to do shit.
-
The actual anonymous group gets things done.
How easy is it to say Anonymous said this or that? Very.
I expect this highly political, left leaning anonymous isn't real. It's such BS...
-
huh? https://github.com/0xc0d/Slow-Loris
i’d assume it doesn’t work anymore….
