Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Privacy
  3. Firefox alternatives?

Firefox alternatives?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Privacy
privacy
77 Posts 47 Posters 400 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • hiddenlayer555@lemmy.mlH [email protected]

    On Linux and Android. What are privacy oriented alternatives to Firefox now that it's no longer trustworthy?

    The ability to sync between devices would be a huge bonus, even just on a local network.

    fireshell@lemmy.mlF This user is from outside of this forum
    fireshell@lemmy.mlF This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #53

    LibreWolf has a mastodon account @[email protected]

    S K 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • S [email protected]

      If you want to keep the Gecko Engine from Mozilla to support an alternative to Google's monopoly here are a couple alternative for Linux :

      • Librewolf
      • Mullvad Browser
      • Zen Browser

      For Android you have to be aware that unfortunately every firefox based browser lack of per-site isolation unlike chromium browsers.

      • IronFox (active fork of Mull by DivestOS)
      • Fennec

      On the dark side of the spectrum you have chromium browser such as :

      • Brave (Linux & Android) (disable cryptocrap, sponsor backgrounds and it's quite good)
      • Cromite (Android)
      breadcat@sh.itjust.worksB This user is from outside of this forum
      breadcat@sh.itjust.worksB This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #54

      Vivaldi is much better than brave, no ai or crypto shit and the CEO isn't alt right

      S drly@lemmy.mlD 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • fireshell@lemmy.mlF [email protected]

        LibreWolf has a mastodon account @[email protected]

        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #55

        I made the switch, its worth noting that there is some differences, like not keeping cookies by default, and you're not able to set it dark mode etc. These can be fixed up through extensions or config changes.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • breadcat@sh.itjust.worksB [email protected]

          Vivaldi is much better than brave, no ai or crypto shit and the CEO isn't alt right

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #56

          Yes Vivaldi doesn't come with crypto bullshit nor AI.
          However by default it's so badly tuned for user privacy... and sprobably even security. Honestly I would prefer having a Vivaldi AI Agent over a proprietary web browser (I know it's mainly open but it's not)
          It was not that well optimized on several of my devices when I tried it...
          I'm not conviced by their chromium proprietary fork even tho it's not the worst alternative either.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R [email protected]

            Zen looks good, but being more unique couldn't it get fingerprinted more easily?

            Also their community is on Discord, which to me is a red flag quite frankly. I realize it's separate from the browser, but still. Discord no good.

            everymuffinisnowencrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zoneE This user is from outside of this forum
            everymuffinisnowencrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zoneE This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #57

            Yeah I don't personally like how unlike LibreWolf it doesn't use ResistFingerprinting.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • I [email protected]

              Yes IronFox is a fork of Mull, and though it does have a couple of differences in opinion on the balance of privacy and usability, it's very similar.

              everymuffinisnowencrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zoneE This user is from outside of this forum
              everymuffinisnowencrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zoneE This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #58

              Is this the GitHub repo for it?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D [email protected]

                So I haven't been following the Firefox thing that closely. Fennec isn't an alternative because it uses Firefox's Sync and Brave is out of the question because it's crypto Chrome?

                P This user is from outside of this forum
                P This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #59

                Fennec is a poor alternative because it connects to Firefox services. Sync is optional, but some internal components will talk to Mozilla, and Mozilla changed their mind about "never selling your data" recently.

                Brave is Chrome with a history of suspicious moves, toxic leadership, involvement with crypto and AI

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D [email protected]

                  Oh also, Ladybird Browser, is being developed. It is not based off of Mozilla Firefox or Google Chromium or Safari. They're building their own browser independently without getting any code from other browsers.
                  The Alpha release is planned to come out on 2026.

                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #60

                  Impossible to take them seriously if they have already started off on the wrong foot using exclusively megacorpo proprietary platforms for coms. If your developer / testers privacy doesn’t matter since they opted for Microsoft GitHub & Discord, what would lead you to believe their project would take privacy seriously?

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • fireshell@lemmy.mlF [email protected]

                    LibreWolf has a mastodon account @[email protected]

                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #61

                    It's sad lemmy is not official, 🥺. I remember when @[email protected] was sharing stuff in here, and he was part of the Librewolf devs

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R [email protected]

                      Zen looks good, but being more unique couldn't it get fingerprinted more easily?

                      Also their community is on Discord, which to me is a red flag quite frankly. I realize it's separate from the browser, but still. Discord no good.

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Guest
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #62

                      these days if i find any project exclusively active on socials like discord and twitter, and github forge, i quit using it. i mean i wont be registering an account there just for community support.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P [email protected]

                        Fennec is a poor alternative because it connects to Firefox services. Sync is optional, but some internal components will talk to Mozilla, and Mozilla changed their mind about "never selling your data" recently.

                        Brave is Chrome with a history of suspicious moves, toxic leadership, involvement with crypto and AI

                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #63

                        I remembered using Vivaldi a while back, I think I'll look into it again.

                        E 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D [email protected]

                          So I haven't been following the Firefox thing that closely. Fennec isn't an alternative because it uses Firefox's Sync and Brave is out of the question because it's crypto Chrome?

                          jherazob@beehaw.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jherazob@beehaw.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #64

                          Here's some info on why Brave is to be avoided

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • hiddenlayer555@lemmy.mlH [email protected]

                            On Linux and Android. What are privacy oriented alternatives to Firefox now that it's no longer trustworthy?

                            The ability to sync between devices would be a huge bonus, even just on a local network.

                            O This user is from outside of this forum
                            O This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #65

                            Cromite, it's basically Vanadium for non GrapheneOS devices

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cypherpunks@lemmy.mlC [email protected]

                              https://digdeeper.club/articles/browsers.xhtml has a somewhat comprehensive analysis of a large number of browsers you might consider, illuminating depressing (and sometimes surprising) downsides to literally all of them.

                              In the end it absurdly recommends something which forked from Firefox a very long time ago, which is obviously not a reasonable choice from a security standpoint. I don't have a good recommendation, but I definitely don't agree with that article's conclusion: privacy features are pointless if your browser is trivially vulnerable to exploits for a plethora of old bugs, which will inevitably be the case for a volunteer-run project that diverged from Firefox a long time ago and thus cannot benefit from Mozilla's security fixes in each new release.

                              However, despite its ridiculous conclusion, that page's analysis is still useful in in deciding which of the terrible options to pick.

                              firipu@startrek.websiteF This user is from outside of this forum
                              firipu@startrek.websiteF This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #66

                              While it was an interesting read, the article is quite outdated and the author is overly negative of literally everything, not just privacy. If a browser has a glowy button, it's horrible because it's too fancy... I feel for the guy...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T [email protected]

                                Impossible to take them seriously if they have already started off on the wrong foot using exclusively megacorpo proprietary platforms for coms. If your developer / testers privacy doesn’t matter since they opted for Microsoft GitHub & Discord, what would lead you to believe their project would take privacy seriously?

                                D This user is from outside of this forum
                                D This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #67

                                Ah that does makes sense. I didn't think about that.
                                I still do hope it'll go well though, simply because more options will be available.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D [email protected]

                                  Depends on your specific case, but IMO in order of preference for deskop, Tor Browser as much as possible, followed by Mullvad Browser as much as you can, for scenarios where you cannot use Tor Browser, followed by LibreWolf for the few sites that require persistent logins (you'll need to enable setting cookies for those specific sites).
                                  There's also other Firefox forks like GNU IceCat (unofficial binary for it), Floorp and Zen Browser.

                                  For a less complicated alternative, just swap out Firefox with LibreWolf. Just make sure to read the ENTIRE docs to save yourself from any nasty surprises. Especially about RFP (Resist Fingerprinting), WebGL, Canvas, etc.

                                  On Andriod, again, there's Tor Browser, IronFox, Fennec F-Driod. Additionally if you want a browser based on a different engine, there's Cromite, which is based off of Chromium, but it's probably better to stay with a less commonly used engine like Firefox rather than keep using the mainstream monopoly of Google.

                                  As an aside, this video helped me understand some stuff better and it seems to be less of Mozilla being untrustworthy and more about them being total losers in communication. I recommend checking it out.

                                  E This user is from outside of this forum
                                  E This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #68

                                  I don't have 512 gb of ram needed to open more than two browsers at the same time, high roller.

                                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D [email protected]

                                    I remembered using Vivaldi a while back, I think I'll look into it again.

                                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #69

                                    Still buggy

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E [email protected]

                                      I don't have 512 gb of ram needed to open more than two browsers at the same time, high roller.

                                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #70

                                      You don't need all that much RAM to be honest. You don't need to use two of them at the same time either to compartmentalise your life. And my second paragraph covers the case that you'd prefer if you don't wanna compartmentalise.

                                      E 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D [email protected]

                                        You don't need all that much RAM to be honest. You don't need to use two of them at the same time either to compartmentalise your life. And my second paragraph covers the case that you'd prefer if you don't wanna compartmentalise.

                                        E This user is from outside of this forum
                                        E This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #71

                                        Correct you need about 32 gb of ram to use two web browsers at the same time.

                                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S [email protected]

                                          If you want to keep the Gecko Engine from Mozilla to support an alternative to Google's monopoly here are a couple alternative for Linux :

                                          • Librewolf
                                          • Mullvad Browser
                                          • Zen Browser

                                          For Android you have to be aware that unfortunately every firefox based browser lack of per-site isolation unlike chromium browsers.

                                          • IronFox (active fork of Mull by DivestOS)
                                          • Fennec

                                          On the dark side of the spectrum you have chromium browser such as :

                                          • Brave (Linux & Android) (disable cryptocrap, sponsor backgrounds and it's quite good)
                                          • Cromite (Android)
                                          drly@lemmy.mlD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          drly@lemmy.mlD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #72

                                          I have been daily driving Zen and aside from some random issues here and there when they mess with the UI (which is to be expected with a beta). It kind of reminds me of how cool Firefox felt back in the day coming from IE. Has been fun to see real progress and effort to try weird things that are local to the browser. Not trying to acquire costly extra services/products that take resources away from the browser. I just really wish Mozilla would have (or even start) allowing people to donate towards just the browser.

                                          Some of the extra stuff they have have the option to directly support. The browser is still worth being a real option that isn't just some Chromium-based BS. Yet they keep trying to divert money to everything but it. I hope that the major forks of FF start tying to prepare for going forward in the main code without Mozilla when/if the time comes. This new IE that is Chrome/Chromium can't be allowed to keep going and dictating what is and isn't allowed.

                                          I also have LibreWolf and Mullvad (along with tor) and like them for the efforts in privacy and security. But are too restrictive for daily use for me. Mostly use them only with VPN when finding torrents and other stuff that I don't want to be tied to an account/syncing (not just NSFW but searching and looking into political or questionable topics). Very happy to have options no matter what.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups