Trump says Palestinians will have no right of return to Gaza under his plan
-
This is such a thought terminating question being posed in bad faith.
You can respect and support the Palestinian people, and still realize that Harris was the best option for the Palestinians we had on the table. To not vote was giving a vote to trump, and trump is significantly worse than Harris for the Palestinians, this is objective truth, we have the facts in front of us right now.
Not voting was essentially voting against the Palestinian people.
Is it fair that we had the choices we had in November? No.
But the protest vote just turned into voting for this century's Mussolini and a guy who's doing his damnedest to start WW3.
Which seems...antithetical to the purpose of the protest vote? So who really won here?
-
So did the DNC though, supporting Israel was more important to them than winning "the most important election of our time".
-
Bidens suggestion was explicitly about allowing Palestinians to flee into Egypt short term
Just how gullible are you? When has any expulsion or relocation of Palestinians out of a territory ever been temporary? Biden isn't a complete moron. He would know as well as anyone that there is no such thing as a temporary relocation of Palestinians.
-
-
-
-
I voted for Harris, but I also recognize the great value of people refusing to vote for a Democratic candidate when they move too far to the right. If there is no consequence for drifting right, the candidates will continue to do so.
The whole "preserve democracy" thing sounds good if you don't think about it too hard, but it doesn't hold up to scrutiny. The Biden/Harris team proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that they weren't capable of defending democracy. Nominating Garland proved that. The dems pathetic response to Trump's current lawlessness has proven that.
You can't "defend democracy" just by saying the words "defend democracy." You actually have to do it. And they proved that they were either unwilling or incapable of actually defending democracy. That's why that talking point so fell flat.
-
YOU do not seem to know how elections work beyond a single cycle. You view each election as singular isolated event, and you have zero perspective of the grander game that's played between cycles.
What exactly do you think would happen if 100% of Dem voters always "voted blue no matter who?" If every Dem vote is already locked in from day one, what incentive does the party have to do anything to actually represent them? This is why the Dems worked so hard to court Republicans to vote for Harris. They figured that the Dem base was so scared of Trump that their votes were already locked in.
If you want a party to actually represent your beliefs, there have to be some people on your side willing to walk away if the party drifts too far out of line. If no Democratic voters are ever willing to abandon a Democrat for being too conservative, then the Dem candidates will drift further and further right each cycle.
Yes, there's the idea of democracy being on the line, but when is democracy NOT going to be on the line? And truthfully, the Democratic leaders proved that they were not reliable stewards of Democracy. The party that nominated Garland had zero ability to argue that they would defend democracy. Just look at how limp-wristed the Democrats in Congress have been in responding to Trump's lawlessness. These people are not capable of defending democracy. Trump should have been thrown in Gitmo on day one of the Biden administration. Instead Biden nominated a Republican to be his attorney general, and the rest is history.
-
-
When did I defend genocide?
-
By not voting against the guy who straight up said he would be a dictator on day one and no one would ever have to vote again.
-
People can weasel themselves around terms like "fascist" quite easily, because there are multiple definitions, many are very diffuse and there's a lot of disagreement around it - but ethnic cleansing to my understanding is quite simple and this is it. Can any serious political commentator pretend it's not? The forced removal of Poles from west Poland (annexed by USSR) after WW2 for example was not a slaughter, but is considered an act of ethnic cleansing.
-
And yet Trump is still worse on that "single issue" that was important enough to let him win over.
Yeah, I'd like the Democrats to be farther left on a lot of things too, but I understand the system we live in and I remember 2016-2020.
-
-
Where did I say who I voted for?
-
I said something similar a few months before he got into office, got down voted to hell.
-
What is this thing? And why?
 -
At least she and Biden attempted to negotiate peace.
No, they really didn't
The diplomat said Egypt rejected similar proposals from the Biden administration and European countries early in the war, which was sparked by Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023 attack into southern Israel. The earlier proposals were broached privately, while Trump announced his plan at a White House press conference alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
-
I mean I agree with some of your points I just would have waited until trump was dead of old age before trying to do a protest vote but hey different strokes for different folks I guess. at least we wont have to talk about gaza anymore since it will be fucking gone haha
-
The disingenuous is your statement saying they will be allowed back, how about move them back to their home that they cannot return to since 1984 ? or moving them to housing options in west bank ? why Egypt? why Jordan?
why would Egypt send their military and build a wall across the border when Biden admin suggested that? Israel was planing that before October, On June 2023 their prime minister goes to UN and draw a pipeline on a map across Gaza. Making it clear they want to annex it. Do you think the US weren't aware of it? Do you think Egypt who warn Israel about October didn't pass the info to the US?
Do you really think people don't read history or know what is going on to believe outlandish statement that Biden will move them to Egypt, drop the equivalent of two nuclear bomb on the region, then build it up, then bring people back?
