Sid Meier's Civilization VII | Review Thread
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Anyone know if it will have cross platform play? My brother is going to get it on ps5, but I would rather get it for Mac… unless we will be unable to play together.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
They said it will. Hopefully it will work better than with civ6
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I never realized 6 had it, but I have not played multiplayer in probably 12 years.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Agreed. The reviews are way too good for a Civ game on release. Would be the first in a while that doesn't need DLCs to be really good.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Really? Because there are plenty of reviews that captured the state of that game at release, and they're generally better at articulating it than the guy who has 1000 hours in a game and calls it "literally unplayable" in a Steam review.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Ign gave it a 7/10:
There's one historical movie scene that comes to mind for me when I think about Sid Meier's Civilization 7, and it's not a flashy arena fight in Gladiator or mission control cheering as we safely bring Apollo 13 back home. It's Leo DiCaprio as Howard Hughes in The Aviator, running his hand along an airplane fuselage and insisting that he doesn't want to see any rivets.
Ouch
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Especially in a game like Civ. it's hard to know how people feel about it until a week or so later. I remember when Civ 6 was said to be the best game in the series on release, but after spending some time with it, it was lacking. Reviews like these are more of a first impressions.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Unless my friends, who have put a lot of hours into both Civ 5 and 6, unanimously recommend 7 to me, I have no intention of getting it.
I'm both satisfied enough with what I already own, and not sold on the new one yet. Not to mention that it'll inevitably be a vehicle for more dlc and expansion pack sales
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's more about how does the game function at release is there a performance issue that would prompt a hardware upgrade.
It's not a dig at the game I'm sure it's great but these websites are frequently paid for a good review.
Civ is known for having issues at release just because its such a giant game to program
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Individual Steam reviews may be trash but the average rating is valuable and usually pretty reliable. The biggest downside of the system is that it isn't quick to "respond" to updates but the separate "Recent" rating helps a lot.
The point you're responding to is that C:S 2 was praised by reviewers at launch despite it having TONS of issues and missing features. The Steam ratings were a way more accurate picture of the game.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
They won't. For some reason you are only allowed to like a single civ game and you must hate every sequent game.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You can read into individual reviews rather than just looking at the aggregate. Plenty pointed out its problems.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I don't know which sites you think are getting paid for good reviews (this is a persistent myth), but find one or two that you trust.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Reviews like these are paid advertising.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You can use both
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's kinda broken because you have to use the same build but 99% of the time they are not synced across platforms
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
No one's said anything about hating it. For me, it's primarily a co-op game, and if they're not going to switch to it, it's better for me to save the cash, and put it towards something else
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Is it more understandable can civ 6? I'm a fan of goddamn stellaris and could competently play civ 5 but civ 6 is like being beaten half to death with a textbook on quantumn physics and then told to sit an exam. The tutorial prepares you for the game about as much as a stick of chewing gum prepares you for the beating.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I was just making a joke about civ fans always dislike every civ game except their favorite.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Civ V had mediocre-to-bad gameplay on release, but was transformed into something good by the Brave New World DLC. I have read that Civ VI was similarly improved (although perhaps with a bit less success) by way of DLC.
Judging by the initial reviews of this one, it looks like a pattern is developing. I guess I'll once again wait a few years until the "fix" DLC has been out for a while, and buy the combo pack on sale.
Unless they use Denuvo or some other anti-customer nonsense that I won't support.