Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Asklemmy
  3. What Pseudoscience do you Believe?

What Pseudoscience do you Believe?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Asklemmy
asklemmy
166 Posts 92 Posters 2.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D [email protected]

    Time probably isn't real.

    I don't know what to do with that information. It's just a weird gut feeling.

    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    Counterpoint:

    Time IS real, but like all dimensiona of space it must be traversed in a direction. We can only experience it in a linear fashion, but as it can be traversed there must be a forward and backward (regardless of if we can access it or not). Ergo, predestination is real because all moments are happening simultaneously in different locations upon the time axis.

    D chaoscruiser@futurology.todayC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • P [email protected]

      The more I learn the more time feels emergent and not required.

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote on last edited by
      #59

      That... actually makes a lot of sense. Time could just be an emergent property of entropy. The second law of thermodynamics (the sum of the entropies of the interacting thermodynamic systems never decreases) could then be applied to explain why time appears to only move in one direction.

      P S 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • machinist@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

        All electrical components contain magic smoke that was put into them at the time of manufacture. If that smoke is released, it doesn't work anymore.

        Some broken or malfunctioning machinery respond to incantations projected with emotion. Cuss a machine hard enough and it will start working again.

        Another one I've personally experienced, but don't know of any studies for: the main casting of machining equipment such as mills or lathes is a big crystal with unique properties. Each machine has different frequencies it resonates at when cutting. You can hear and feel the vibration when cutting and tune the machine/program for more efficient cutting and tool life. Sort of like taking a guitar that is out of tune and tuning it to a pleasant chord. Two identical machines will need different tunings. This tuning can change over time due to wear, temperature, humidity or maybe the phase of the moon.

        Unrelated to machinery: there are mountain lions in the deep south in the deep woods. I had one check me out once. The state wildlife agency denies the modern existence of mountain lions and I didn't believe in them until I was face to face with one. I had to growl and hiss at it to convince it that I wasn't interesting.

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #60

        So that's what happened when I plugged my 120 V appliance into a 240 V outlet, I released the magic smoke.

        machinist@lemmy.worldM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M [email protected]

          So that's what happened when I plugged my 120 V appliance into a 240 V outlet, I released the magic smoke.

          machinist@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
          machinist@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #61

          Yup. Unfortunately, once released, the magic smoke is gone and cannot be replaced.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C [email protected]

            None. If any of it was reproducable it would science instead of pseudoscience

            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #62

            Although anyone who works in an ER will tell you the full moon is the busiest night; the occurrence rate of every issue but murder goes up.

            K joelfromaus@aussie.zoneJ 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • P [email protected]

              If it’s not provable by science, then I don’t believe it.

              F This user is from outside of this forum
              F This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #63

              You express plenty of opinions not provable by science in your comment-history.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • allo@sh.itjust.worksA [email protected]

                Came across a list of pseudosciences and was fun seeing where im woo woo.

                Lunar effect – the belief that the full Moon influences human and animal behavior.

                Ley Lines

                Accupressure/puncture

                Ayurveda

                Body Memory

                Faith healing

                Anyway, list too long to read. I guess Im quite the nonscientific woowoomancer. How about you? What pseudoscience do you believe? Also I believe nearly every stone i find was an ancient indian stone. Also manifesting and or prayer to manipulate via subconscious aligning the future.

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #64

                Modern geocentrism

                kinda. It's more that "center" of the universe can be picked completely arbitrarily. I can say I'm the center of the universe, and when I spin on my chair, the universe revolves around me. You can define the frame of reference however you wish to. The change of perspective does not change how orbits work.

                Lunar effect – the belief that the full Moon influences human and animal behavior.

                by that short definition sure, but probably not how they mean. If you're active at night, the amount of ambient light is surely going to impact your behavior. Not so much in areas with artificial lighting.

                Memetics.

                Insofar as there are self-replicating ideas, and the ones more likely to self-replicate become more prevalent...sure. Not the whole story either, as ideas can also be pushed by people that don't believe those ideas.

                __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works_ C M 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • D [email protected]

                  Time probably isn't real.

                  I don't know what to do with that information. It's just a weird gut feeling.

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #65

                  Listen up brother because im about to open your third eyes fourth eye. Time is a construct made up by the big clock industry to get us addicted to their minute munchers which is exactly why I stop looking at them.

                  I dont know what day or time it is. I'm pretty sure I haven't slept in 84 hours and I've never been more certain that I am absolutely terrified of everything.

                  Wake up.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • machinist@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

                    All electrical components contain magic smoke that was put into them at the time of manufacture. If that smoke is released, it doesn't work anymore.

                    Some broken or malfunctioning machinery respond to incantations projected with emotion. Cuss a machine hard enough and it will start working again.

                    Another one I've personally experienced, but don't know of any studies for: the main casting of machining equipment such as mills or lathes is a big crystal with unique properties. Each machine has different frequencies it resonates at when cutting. You can hear and feel the vibration when cutting and tune the machine/program for more efficient cutting and tool life. Sort of like taking a guitar that is out of tune and tuning it to a pleasant chord. Two identical machines will need different tunings. This tuning can change over time due to wear, temperature, humidity or maybe the phase of the moon.

                    Unrelated to machinery: there are mountain lions in the deep south in the deep woods. I had one check me out once. The state wildlife agency denies the modern existence of mountain lions and I didn't believe in them until I was face to face with one. I had to growl and hiss at it to convince it that I wasn't interesting.

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #66

                    I completely believe the mountain lions one. Wasn't the largest ever mountain lion just captured and tagged in Florida? It's not hard to believe a family or two migrated out of Florida into the rest of the South. The woods are so thick, it seems like a great place to live.

                    machinist@lemmy.worldM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D [email protected]

                      Cryptozoology. There are definitely creatures unknown to science. Dozens of new ones are discovered every day. Loch Ness monster - no. Unknown ape - possibly.

                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #67

                      There are a fair few accounts in Tasmania about thylacines still existing. The lands are so rugged and harsh that there's not really any solid way to get in there and search. But I'll believe it, absolutely.

                      absgeeknz@lemmy.nzA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • W [email protected]

                        Yeah it just makes sense. Everything has a little bit of consciousness in it, even subatomic particles would have a non-zero amount. But the consciousness of these particles then combine in complex and nonlinear ways. Something like, IDK, the combined consciousness of a collection of particles is proportional to their individual level taken to the n power, where n is equal to the number of particle interactions. Totally guessing on the actual math, but it would be something complex and nonlinear like that. If you could quantify consciousness, and humans had a measure of 1 consciousness unit, then the consciousness of an electron would be something like 1/Googolplex consciousness units. Something insane like that. Technically nonzero, but so small as to make an amoeba look like a intellectual giant.

                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #68

                        I would agree depending on how you see physics. I think there is no smallest unit, no fundamental, infinite big and small. So though size comparisons make relative sense, they don't describe relative complexity.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A [email protected]

                          Counterpoint:

                          Time IS real, but like all dimensiona of space it must be traversed in a direction. We can only experience it in a linear fashion, but as it can be traversed there must be a forward and backward (regardless of if we can access it or not). Ergo, predestination is real because all moments are happening simultaneously in different locations upon the time axis.

                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #69

                          must be traversed in one direction

                          See that's the part I'm not so sure of. At least for all information transfer. Matter is likely too weighty to go against the current.

                          But time "feels" like a plane where traversal is just beyond my fingertips.

                          Or I'm just in the really early phases of dementia.

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ? Guest

                            That... actually makes a lot of sense. Time could just be an emergent property of entropy. The second law of thermodynamics (the sum of the entropies of the interacting thermodynamic systems never decreases) could then be applied to explain why time appears to only move in one direction.

                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #70

                            Seeing as the time axis doesn't seem special compared to spacial ones (especially in edge cases like black holes) I think time is just a perspective thing.

                            My take is that all particles must be moving at the speed of light through 4d space time. Everything always moves at the speed of causality, just not always in the direction you are looking from.

                            Do we know if the second law of thermodynamics is just a statistical thing? Does it work at extremely small scales? I know heat propagation could transfer from cold to hot. Its just so astronomically unlikely especially the more complicated the system gets.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S [email protected]

                              Although anyone who works in an ER will tell you the full moon is the busiest night; the occurrence rate of every issue but murder goes up.

                              K This user is from outside of this forum
                              K This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #71

                              CITATION NEEDED

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A [email protected]

                                And it's called a rhino! I do admit that I use the term horse-like rather broadly here.

                                dirk@lemmy.mlD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dirk@lemmy.mlD This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #72

                                It’s an armored unicorn then!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D [email protected]

                                  Cryptozoology. There are definitely creatures unknown to science. Dozens of new ones are discovered every day. Loch Ness monster - no. Unknown ape - possibly.

                                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #73

                                  I just know we'll find that damned Insulindian Phasmid soon

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P [email protected]

                                    If it’s not provable by science, then I don’t believe it.

                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #74

                                    Gödel would like to have a word with you

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • allo@sh.itjust.worksA [email protected]

                                      Came across a list of pseudosciences and was fun seeing where im woo woo.

                                      Lunar effect – the belief that the full Moon influences human and animal behavior.

                                      Ley Lines

                                      Accupressure/puncture

                                      Ayurveda

                                      Body Memory

                                      Faith healing

                                      Anyway, list too long to read. I guess Im quite the nonscientific woowoomancer. How about you? What pseudoscience do you believe? Also I believe nearly every stone i find was an ancient indian stone. Also manifesting and or prayer to manipulate via subconscious aligning the future.

                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #75

                                      The only pseudo science I believe is that one day I'll be happy. Even though I know i ll never be happy.

                                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D [email protected]

                                        must be traversed in one direction

                                        See that's the part I'm not so sure of. At least for all information transfer. Matter is likely too weighty to go against the current.

                                        But time "feels" like a plane where traversal is just beyond my fingertips.

                                        Or I'm just in the really early phases of dementia.

                                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #76

                                        I think it's like... in terms of time we're kind of '2D'. Like if you picture a dot on a sheet of paper, it can only move around the directions on that flat plane. That's time and velocity for us. if you go further up the X axis, you go less far along the Y axis, which is why time slows down the faster you go.

                                        If you were somehow '3D' in time, it's be like if you lifted the pen off the paper, you could hop around all over the place or maybe even to a different sheet of paper entirely.

                                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • chaoscruiser@futurology.todayC [email protected]

                                          The USB law.

                                          When you try to plug in a USB-A connector, there's a 70% probability it won't go in. Mathematically it should be 50%, but I don't believe that.

                                          You switch it around, and there's a 30% probability it won't go in. This is not something they taught at school.

                                          You switch it around the third time, and there's a 5% chance it still won't go in. Your mind begins to melt down, you switch and insert repeatedly until it finally works sooner or later.

                                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #77

                                          It's the XCOM principle lol.

                                          A shot with a 99% chance to hit will miss far more often than you think.

                                          A shot with a 1% chance to hit will miss pretty much exactly as much as you think.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups