Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. Palestinians starve as Israel continues full ban on humanitarian aid

Palestinians starve as Israel continues full ban on humanitarian aid

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
world
62 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Guest

    My bad, I thought it was temporary not lasting.

    That said I stand by my doubts that this will end without total annihilation on either side. Israel can’t forgive Hamas or Hamas Israel without either side literally changing theirs beliefs and values which ain’t happening.

    I This user is from outside of this forum
    I This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    Hamas refused temporary ceasefires multiple times in 2024. The only reason Hamas agreed to this one was the promise of a lasting ceasefire.

    Which also contradicts your second argument, Hamas is actively working to reach a peaceful solution. Israel is refusing every attempt and violating ceasefire agreements.

    This is not a both sides issue. Only one side is the problem.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I [email protected]

      Hamas refused temporary ceasefires multiple times in 2024. The only reason Hamas agreed to this one was the promise of a lasting ceasefire.

      Which also contradicts your second argument, Hamas is actively working to reach a peaceful solution. Israel is refusing every attempt and violating ceasefire agreements.

      This is not a both sides issue. Only one side is the problem.

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote on last edited by
      #52

      I’m sorry but I’ve heard Jews and Palestinians outside of Israel complain about Hamas specifically for a very long time and I can’t believe they genuinely want peace because they still have hostages, considering Israel said this conflict will end when the hostages are released many times now.

      Israel is angry at Hamas like they never have been before and it seems to me Hamas only wants peace now because they’re losing and are afraid.

      I 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest

        I’m sorry but I’ve heard Jews and Palestinians outside of Israel complain about Hamas specifically for a very long time and I can’t believe they genuinely want peace because they still have hostages, considering Israel said this conflict will end when the hostages are released many times now.

        Israel is angry at Hamas like they never have been before and it seems to me Hamas only wants peace now because they’re losing and are afraid.

        I This user is from outside of this forum
        I This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #53

        Hamas took captives because Israel has 10.000 Palestinian hostages.

        Why would Hamas release their captives if Israel does not do the same? Your argument makes no sense. Especially knowing Israel will starve and kill all Palestinians if Hamas has no leverage.

        Hamas is very clearly doing everything to achieve peace. Israel is the agressor.

        ? 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S [email protected]

          It’s a logical fallacy that I have to solve peace in the Middle East before I can evaluate the morality of kidnapping, rape, and murder.

          But I do recognize my privilege. Moral qualms and principles are a luxury. Does this make them meaningless? Ceding morality to those locked in a cycle of murder takes us to a dark place.

          The Israelis say the same shit you are, frankly. “You would do the same thing if they’d taken your family?” And “easy for you to criticize from the outside.” So this is easy to reflect back at you. Unless you’re sitting in Tel Aviv right now, you’re judging from a privileged place

          Like I said, I’ve followed this conflict for 40 years. Casting off moral qualms to engage in a tooth and nail cycle of endless murder is what got everyone here, not what’s going to get them out. Hate cannot drive out hate, said someone less privileged than I.

          You can have the final word here. I only ask that you spend it on something other than ad hominem if you can.

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #54

          Condescending and concern trolling. Nice. As if I haven’t been following the conflict for decades or spent years studying it in school or multiple trips to both Israel and Palestine and surrounding countries.

          I never said moral qualms are a luxury, you’re creating a strawman to beat. I said you’re trolling by pretending that you have a better solution for Palestinians and lambasting them for not following your enlightened opinion from your ivory tower. Hate cannot drive out hate, but Netanyahu’s government is certainly trying their hardest despite decades of failure. What’s going to end the cycle is for the rest of the world to call them out; for the Israeli government pursuing maximalist expansion and deprivation of human rights for millions and oppression of their own citizens. You instead mouth platitudes with your condescension and sound deeply out of touch, belying the claim that you’ve allegedly been following this conflict so closely.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B [email protected]

            The going rate is 1:1027 for an NCO.

            queermunist@lemmy.mlQ This user is from outside of this forum
            queermunist@lemmy.mlQ This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #55

            Different administration controlled by a different party and before they reformulated the Hannibal Directive in 2016.

            That said, Hamas probably did make a strategic mistake by thinking Israel would give a shit about its people, but in so doing they also achieved another strategic objective - the heightening of contradictions within Israeli society by showing Israeli citizens how little their government cares about them and how willing it is to kill them for a strategic advantage. They also managed to show the world that Israeli is a rogue state and it has become more isolated than ever before.

            We'll see how this works out in the long run, but don't discount Oct 7th as a failure just yet.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • I [email protected]

              Hamas took captives because Israel has 10.000 Palestinian hostages.

              Why would Hamas release their captives if Israel does not do the same? Your argument makes no sense. Especially knowing Israel will starve and kill all Palestinians if Hamas has no leverage.

              Hamas is very clearly doing everything to achieve peace. Israel is the agressor.

              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Guest
              wrote on last edited by
              #56

              If you’re talking about the base population of Palestine being held being held captive, maybe Hamas should accepted sovereignty and a two state when it was on the table of using humanitarian funds to build a tunnel network and military headquarters under schools and hospitals they can launch missiles at Israel from.

              What Israel is doing is cruel and they are going to reap this karma for decades in not centuries to come but because of the nature of war it is more justifiable to completely annihilate and enemy than to leave them standing given such history, because this enemy does not accept peace, wants global jihad, and is just as zealous if not more than they are sometimes.

              According to Sun Tzu, if it gets down to this, when you cannot win against this foe through diplomacy, if you do not crush the enemy entirely they will simply regroup and try again. He learned that during a time in China where kingdoms were being established and genocide wasn’t considered a war crime but a punishment for losing a war without accepting defeat. This what Israel is facing. You could say the times are different but in this way, war never changes.

              I 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ? Guest

                If you’re talking about the base population of Palestine being held being held captive, maybe Hamas should accepted sovereignty and a two state when it was on the table of using humanitarian funds to build a tunnel network and military headquarters under schools and hospitals they can launch missiles at Israel from.

                What Israel is doing is cruel and they are going to reap this karma for decades in not centuries to come but because of the nature of war it is more justifiable to completely annihilate and enemy than to leave them standing given such history, because this enemy does not accept peace, wants global jihad, and is just as zealous if not more than they are sometimes.

                According to Sun Tzu, if it gets down to this, when you cannot win against this foe through diplomacy, if you do not crush the enemy entirely they will simply regroup and try again. He learned that during a time in China where kingdoms were being established and genocide wasn’t considered a war crime but a punishment for losing a war without accepting defeat. This what Israel is facing. You could say the times are different but in this way, war never changes.

                I This user is from outside of this forum
                I This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #57

                When was this two state offer you speak of? The rest of your comment is also nonsense so address this first.

                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • I [email protected]

                  When was this two state offer you speak of? The rest of your comment is also nonsense so address this first.

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #58

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_solution

                  I 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ? Guest

                    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_solution

                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #59

                    I said offer to Hamas not random Wikipedia page.

                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • I [email protected]

                      I said offer to Hamas not random Wikipedia page.

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Guest
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #60

                      No difference. You want to know the history, read.

                      I 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ? Guest

                        No difference. You want to know the history, read.

                        I This user is from outside of this forum
                        I This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #61

                        Quote it.

                        ? 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • I [email protected]

                          Quote it.

                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Guest
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #62

                          Not how this works.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • System shared this topic on
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups