Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Asklemmy
  3. What is the end game?

What is the end game?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Asklemmy
asklemmy
85 Posts 58 Posters 303 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • vk6flab@lemmy.radioV [email protected]

    What kind of world are the Orange and his puppet master billionaires building?

    Are we headed for slavery, extinction, the matrix or some other post apocalyptic future?

    How do these despots think that food arrives?

    At the moment it seems they're hell bent on global destruction.

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Guest
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    I think once the singularity is reached with AI, it will quickly be able to take over all systems (including banking). I believe that it will be benevolent and will help humanity reach enlightenment. Most people will get an early retirement. But, some people such as Musk, Zuck, Bezos, will be considered essential and will be required to assist the AI and their robot armies in the fields, restaurants, factories, etc. I’m thinking we would only need about 1% of the population to work at that time, the top 1% are the best candidates.

    W D 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • D [email protected]

      Look up curtis yarvin. That's basically their ideology. So 100s or 1000s of city states scattered around north America. Mostly dominated by either the religious extreme or tech bros and ai.

      M This user is from outside of this forum
      M This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      Ah, shit man.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin

      Yarvin has influenced some prominent Silicon Valley investors and Republican politicians, with venture capitalist Peter Thiel described as his "most important connection".[15] Political strategist Steve Bannon has read and admired his work.[16] U.S. Vice President JD Vance "has cited Yarvin as an influence himself."[17][18][19] Michael Anton, the State Department Director of Policy Planning during Trump's second presidency, has also discussed Yarvin's ideas.[20] In January 2025, Yarvin attended a Trump inaugural gala in Washington; Politico reported he was "an informal guest of honor" due to his "outsize influence over the Trumpian right."[21]

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • vk6flab@lemmy.radioV [email protected]

        What kind of world are the Orange and his puppet master billionaires building?

        Are we headed for slavery, extinction, the matrix or some other post apocalyptic future?

        How do these despots think that food arrives?

        At the moment it seems they're hell bent on global destruction.

        E This user is from outside of this forum
        E This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #21

        Slavery, war and genocides.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M [email protected]

          Ah, shit man.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin

          Yarvin has influenced some prominent Silicon Valley investors and Republican politicians, with venture capitalist Peter Thiel described as his "most important connection".[15] Political strategist Steve Bannon has read and admired his work.[16] U.S. Vice President JD Vance "has cited Yarvin as an influence himself."[17][18][19] Michael Anton, the State Department Director of Policy Planning during Trump's second presidency, has also discussed Yarvin's ideas.[20] In January 2025, Yarvin attended a Trump inaugural gala in Washington; Politico reported he was "an informal guest of honor" due to his "outsize influence over the Trumpian right."[21]

          D This user is from outside of this forum
          D This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #22

          Surprised more people aren't aware of this. It's basically the end of western civilization as we know it. Not even a theory really seeing as what they needed to happen in order for their plans to be successful has already happened. Anyone who could have stopped them has already been fired and replaced with loyalists.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • vk6flab@lemmy.radioV [email protected]

            What kind of world are the Orange and his puppet master billionaires building?

            Are we headed for slavery, extinction, the matrix or some other post apocalyptic future?

            How do these despots think that food arrives?

            At the moment it seems they're hell bent on global destruction.

            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #23

            To get all of the tricks remaining in the deck

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • emberleaf@lemmy.mlE [email protected]

              And don't forget turning into a vassal state to the Kremlin. Ol' Kraznov and his Cuck are going to sell us all out to Putin - if we allow him to.

              F This user is from outside of this forum
              F This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #24

              This is so ridiculous. It is literally impossible for the US to become a vassal state of Russia. The USA spends, in aggregate over all states, TWICE AS MUCH ON ITS DOMESTIC POLICE AS RUSSIA SPENDS ON ITS ENTIRE MILITARY INCLUDING NUKES.

              It is literally impossible. You are falling for children's story about the bad people over there.

              P emberleaf@lemmy.mlE 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • vk6flab@lemmy.radioV [email protected]

                What kind of world are the Orange and his puppet master billionaires building?

                Are we headed for slavery, extinction, the matrix or some other post apocalyptic future?

                How do these despots think that food arrives?

                At the moment it seems they're hell bent on global destruction.

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #25

                The world of the 17 th century and the VOC.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D [email protected]

                  Look up curtis yarvin. That's basically their ideology. So 100s or 1000s of city states scattered around north America. Mostly dominated by either the religious extreme or tech bros and ai.

                  obinice@lemmy.worldO This user is from outside of this forum
                  obinice@lemmy.worldO This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #26

                  Fascinating and bizarre, has he published any print books on this subject that I could pick up?

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • vk6flab@lemmy.radioV [email protected]

                    What kind of world are the Orange and his puppet master billionaires building?

                    Are we headed for slavery, extinction, the matrix or some other post apocalyptic future?

                    How do these despots think that food arrives?

                    At the moment it seems they're hell bent on global destruction.

                    geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                    geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #27

                    Endgame?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O [email protected]

                      Nah, that population thing doesn't seem to add up to me, otherwise they wouldn't have done everything they have to ban women's reproductive rights and right to abortion...

                      j4k3@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      j4k3@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #28

                      ::: spoiler Abortion keeps people poor and far more exploitable. There is nothing more expensive than being poor.

                      Humans are only a resource to those with no ethics. When there are too many of a living resource causing damage to an environment, one culls the population. One does not shape the environment to ethical concerns about the lives unlucky enough to be within that population.

                      Populists have always been the most dangerous humans that have ever existed.

                      I'm no expert. I hope I am wrong. I break molds. I think for myself. I put pieces together when, in practice, others do not. I want to know and expect the worst case scenario. My abstract thinking and curiosity takes me on many tangential paths to similar conclusions and often right answers. I hope I am wrong, but I do not think so. Peaceful times in history are an exception and not the rule. Drones have massively reduced the cost of killing in the last 2 years. We are on the cusp of autonomous armies instead of infantry. If one is willing to accept unlimited civilian and friendly fire casualties, we are already at that point. The USA has invalidated international law and undermined any legitimacy by blocking any appointments of judiciaries. Africa is a powderkeg of conflicts from Morocco to most of the sub Saharan region to Ethiopia. Rwanda is leveraging participation in the UN to invade the Congo. Venezuela is likely to attack Guiana for oil. Türkiye is likely to attack Cyprus. China is going to take Taiwan by 2030. North Korea has taken unprecedented steps to break off ties with the West and SK, openly stating its intentions to attack SK. Iran has had all of its proxies rendered useless and a more direct approach to conflict is likely.

                      Meanwhile, the USA, Europe, and Japan have declining and aging populations. All also have terrible industrial capacity and nonexistent local resource acquisition. There is no chance that the USA is ramping up a large military force in a hurry like in WW2. Right now, if TSMC and Samsung are stuffed from an attack in Taiwan and South Korea at the same time, all we have left on the cutting edge is Intel and they are in terrible shape right now and largely relying on TSMC for the cutting edge stuff. If all of the fronts open at once, the West cannot cover all of them, and that leads to the inevitable WW3 scenario.

                      Of all the countries in the world of today. I expect Russia and Israel to be clever with intelligence. They have proven themselves more capable than most on many occasions. I think Putin is ramping up production like an underdog getting extra ready for a fight. I think China is pulling most of the strings and doing so to gain Taiwan and end its civil war. I also think Israel secretly knew about Oct 7th and wanted an excuse to annex Gaza and eventually the West Bank. If they know WW3 is coming, both the combat experience and the fortification of more defensible boarders are strategic. The extent that Iranian proxies were neutralized and civilians targeted were no balanced response. Those point at calculated strategy. Israel is also like a US weapons R&D lab of sorts and has been proving and improving AI tech in the conflict. I think they are using a primitive excuse for an AGI to pick targets and shape narratives in the media both in stories and what amounts to assassinations of the press.

                      Then there is the ultimate factor. The whole reason why the world shifted from military driven economics to venture capital is because silicon promised and delivered growth faster than military spending could match. Shockley proposed this all the way back in the late 1950's. That is over now. The exponential growth of silicon is effectively stalled. Without a new industry capable of growth that is substantially larger than what the largest militaries are capable of spending, the world must return to an era of military driven economies that have been the rule for most of recorded history. These economies use their militaries to justify their existence and to press advantages before they disappear. The end of the age of silicon based venture capital should coincide with a return to the ways of the past, and indeed that is what we are seeing early signs of happening. There is no effective replacement for silicon in the works. Technically, the next major age of tech will be biological, but we are likely a couple of centuries away from a solid understanding of biology as a true engineering field where something like a brain can be synthesized as a deterministic Turing complete computer on par with a current generation CPU.

                      Again, I hope I am wrong, but there are many levels of abstraction with pieces lining up indicating that I am not wrong in understanding the worst but likely potential outcome. I expect that, if population control is the underlying main objective, the conflict will be large scale nuclear. It is probably the last chance for them to be super effective anyways. Once automated robotic infantry is possible, goals and warfare change drastically.
                      :::

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B [email protected]

                        I don’t see how you can possibly be certain about this. The push to fight abortion rights and the constant bitching about how people aren’t having enough babies to maintain the workforce undermines this theory.

                        Unless you’re completely convinced that this is the future and the reason for it, I’d strongly suggest against stating it so certainly on the internet. Asking a question about it or stating it as a possibility given certain factors makes sense, but the way you said this can’t be good for your mental health, or the mental health of the people who read it.

                        j4k3@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        j4k3@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #29

                        See my comment to over_clox below. I'm pretty sure on many levels of abstraction. It is unlikely to convince you. I'm cool with that. I don't want it to happen. I'm simply noting the pieces aligning. I am broadly curious in many areas and subjects. I am also more broadly aware and generally skeptical than most people. None of that is a source of depression or in any way shape or form a justification for your accusatory statement implying the state of my mental health. I find that accusation tangential, offensive, and a personal attack in reply to a general statement where there was no individual in question. Turning a broad abstraction into a personal attack on an individual is reprehensible and rather pathetic behavior.

                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J [email protected]

                          Collapse of civilization is right around the corner.

                          I wouldn't be so sure. History is filled with examples of power grabs that endured for generations.

                          P This user is from outside of this forum
                          P This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #30

                          The ability to grow, store, and distribute grains at scale is necessary for the continued existence of civilization. Climate change will destroy this in short order. Once that ability is gone, so will be civilization.

                          There is no tomorrow.

                          cowbee@lemmy.mlC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F [email protected]

                            This is so ridiculous. It is literally impossible for the US to become a vassal state of Russia. The USA spends, in aggregate over all states, TWICE AS MUCH ON ITS DOMESTIC POLICE AS RUSSIA SPENDS ON ITS ENTIRE MILITARY INCLUDING NUKES.

                            It is literally impossible. You are falling for children's story about the bad people over there.

                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #31

                            Trump is a Russian agent and the Kremlin dictates U.S. policy. It's already happened.

                            F 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • vk6flab@lemmy.radioV [email protected]

                              What kind of world are the Orange and his puppet master billionaires building?

                              Are we headed for slavery, extinction, the matrix or some other post apocalyptic future?

                              How do these despots think that food arrives?

                              At the moment it seems they're hell bent on global destruction.

                              objection@lemmy.mlO This user is from outside of this forum
                              objection@lemmy.mlO This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #32

                              What they think they're doing and what they're actually doing are two different questions. What they're aiming to do is keep things trucking along while making as much profit as possible, more or less the same as most politicians, but with a bit more of a realpolitic approach. There is no long term plan, and that goes for basically anyone remotely near to the levers of power. What we have is a system of competing groups all singularly focused on maximizing their profits for the next quarter, nobody's actually at the helm and it's an open question whether anyone could take the helm and alter the course from the natural progression determined by systemic forces.

                              Where we are actually headed, regardless of who's in charge, is a matter of several in convertible facts. First, the US is clearly in decline and will eventually lost its spot as global hegemon, at this point, there is a serious risk that it will start WWIII in response, as Americans are not ones to accept defeat gracefully. Second, climate change will render more and more areas in developing nations unstable or uninhabitable, causing a major refugee crisis which has already started and is going to get considerably worse. What measures will be taken to maintain the dividing lines that keep people from poor countries out of rich countries is another question, and it may well be answered with genocide.

                              If, by some miracle, cooler heads prevail and we don't start WWIII, and you're lucky enough to have been born in a rich country, then we will likely just see things get gradually and progressively worse. But it will be the kind of apocalypse where you still have to go to work. Day to day life will carry on, just with more uncomfortable things you have to push out of mind, more frequent shootings, the reemergence of diseases. There isn't going to be a tipping point that causes a revolution, nor are the elites going to unveil a secret plot to make everyone eat bugs or whatever. You're just going to be working longer hours, according less, retiring later (if at all), and probably having to navigate and even more bullshit process for applying for jobs. This sort of "boring dystopia" is almost certainly where we're headed.

                              The two most important political priorities, arguably the only two priorities that really matter, are demilitarization andopposing war with China, and opposing genocide of foreigners/refugees/immigrants. These are the things we will be facing, perhaps within the next 10 years, and if we aren't able to organize resistance along those lines, things are going to get very ugly. Actually stopping the decline is very unrealistic/implausible and has been for some time.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • vk6flab@lemmy.radioV [email protected]

                                What kind of world are the Orange and his puppet master billionaires building?

                                Are we headed for slavery, extinction, the matrix or some other post apocalyptic future?

                                How do these despots think that food arrives?

                                At the moment it seems they're hell bent on global destruction.

                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #33

                                the two types of people in this world (if you're not a lib):

                                two types of people

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • azzu@lemm.eeA [email protected]

                                  The end game is a cyberpunk-esque corporate controlled future. No government, only companies deciding what's happening. Yes, slavery essentially, because people have to work for them to survive. No "less work" savings because of rising productivity, only more and more money centralized in them.

                                  W This user is from outside of this forum
                                  W This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #34

                                  I'd rather kill myself, and I have plans on how.

                                  azzu@lemm.eeA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • davel@lemmy.mlD [email protected]

                                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #35

                                    Pfft, why do the men have to enjoy it either? Isn't the entire point of being evil to inflict as much suffering as possible?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • W [email protected]

                                      I'd rather kill myself, and I have plans on how.

                                      azzu@lemm.eeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      azzu@lemm.eeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #36

                                      I don't want you to kill yourself. But I hope your plan includes taking a few billionaires with you 😄

                                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ? Guest

                                        I think once the singularity is reached with AI, it will quickly be able to take over all systems (including banking). I believe that it will be benevolent and will help humanity reach enlightenment. Most people will get an early retirement. But, some people such as Musk, Zuck, Bezos, will be considered essential and will be required to assist the AI and their robot armies in the fields, restaurants, factories, etc. I’m thinking we would only need about 1% of the population to work at that time, the top 1% are the best candidates.

                                        W This user is from outside of this forum
                                        W This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #37

                                        I doubt AI will ever have it's own will. First to get their hands on ASI, becomes God forever.

                                        ultragigagigantic@lemmy.mlU 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • azzu@lemm.eeA [email protected]

                                          I don't want you to kill yourself. But I hope your plan includes taking a few billionaires with you 😄

                                          W This user is from outside of this forum
                                          W This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #38

                                          No, just blowing up somewhere quiet that won't do too much damage, but I did think about it, and it's unrealistic. I just want a plan B for when things become intolerable. I won't be a slave.

                                          cheers_queers@lemm.eeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups