How JavaScript Overuse Ruined the Web
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Neglects to mention some of the slowness is real-time ad auctions.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
People use the internet without adblockers?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I found htmx the other day looks like a good fix for most of the js bullshit
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I don't use the internet with less than a hazmat suit.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Most of the web now is like that article.
AI has a role in turning pages and pages of text into one sentence.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Surprisingly, yes. I'm flabbergasted every time someone says, "I'm tired of these ads. I'm going to download an adblocker. Got any recommendations?"
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I got bad news for you… htmx is written in JavaScript.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah but I'd rather 1 piece of js instead of 6000
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Normies do. They vastly outnumber the "barely computer literate"
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah I was being a little sarcastic. I agree that using a single lightweight framework is ideal.
Runtime js for rendering your page is still bad for performance of course. Best to use static html where possible.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
AI has a role in turning pages and pages of text into one sentence.
Right now it's generally used the other way round.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Much like conservatives think someone who talks a lot with conviction is right.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
NoScript ftw
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It took me 3 hours to think and write that article. Maybe you wouldn't call it AI generated if it was actually AI generated.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I appreciate you taking time out to write that. I enjoyed reading it, I think what the parent comment was trying to offer as criticism is that it ended sort of abruptly. I was hoping for a couple more paragraphs on either examples of modern sites or platforms that don’t overly rely on js or a way for end users to use these sites loading only the bare minimum js.
I could just google that information but I was enjoying your point of view. Anyway that’s just my 2 cents
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Great now nothing works 🫠
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
How current web developers no longer knowing what graceful degradation is ruining the web
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Has saved my life. I find myself disabling it for an entire tab several times per day to do things like make a purchase or log in, but I'd still rather that than not have it on the rest of the sites.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I like NoScript but I miss the old XUL version of NoScript.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I mean, this post makes no valid argument against JavaScript, there’s no benchmarks or anything aside from an opinion.
I don’t personally like webdev and don’t like to code in JavaScript, but there are good and bad web applications out there, just like any software.
A single page can send out hundreds or even thousands of API requests just to load, eating up CPU and RAM.
The author seems to know the real problem, so I don’t know why they’re blaming it on JavaScript.