Apple takes UK to court over 'backdoor' order
-
I didn’t say I like Apple or that I trust them or anything. I said we want them to win this lawsuit.
They can win it in a way that will still benefit only them and not you.
-
They can win it in a way that will still benefit only them and not you.
Do you even understand what this lawsuit is about? Do you understand what the ramifications are if they win? If they lose?
-
No
they do not.Get Apple's dick out of your ass.
They literally have a history of moving data to government servers and handing over encryption keys: https://thehackernews.com/2021/05/how-apple-gave-chinese-government.html?m=1
Ok
dude -
bow chicka bow bow
What did the farmer say when the brown chicken walked up to the brown cow?
-
Do you even understand what this lawsuit is about? Do you understand what the ramifications are if they win? If they lose?
Yes, I do. Don't assume.
If they win or lose is irrelevant. If they win, it will not be used for some glorious precedent forever pushing against the governments asking to compromise all software solutions, it will be just a saved implementation time for apple and a pr boost for them among people who don't know better. If they lose, it will be yet another trust and security issue with a closed proprietary unauditable product noone security minded should be using anyway, by a shit company with ties to fascist, willingly cooperating with PRISM and who knows what other programs, in a rogue state which is a part of Five Eyes. -
This post did not contain any content.
So, why are they suddenly allowed to talk about it?
-
This is true, but considering all the US government problems with China, if Apple does send your data to Chinese servers regardless of where you are, I’d guess governments in the US and Europe would make iPhones forbidden for all their sensitive personnel.
why do you think so? are xiaomi phones forbidden for those people?
-
Oh my god the responses are so aggravating
It does not fucking matter what we think of Apple. If they lose this case, we all lose.
This isn’t a discussion about what hardware to buy dude jfc take step back and look around you for 2 seconds
I think we should attack this issue at the root. There are already backdoors in the devices anyway, so what's this court case really going to achieve? I get it, because it would be a known backdoor,, but think of all the nastier NSA backdoors that aren't disclosed to the public. We've lost already by the masses using proprietary garbage.
-
Say what you want about Apple and their motivations, we really need them to win this case.
They care more about protecting their IP and public image, not end privacy of users.
They make a big fuss anytime a public request comes up like the FBI a few years ago, but they have zero issue funneling everything into the NSA just like every other Silicon Valley shmuck.
-
Yes, I do. Don't assume.
If they win or lose is irrelevant. If they win, it will not be used for some glorious precedent forever pushing against the governments asking to compromise all software solutions, it will be just a saved implementation time for apple and a pr boost for them among people who don't know better. If they lose, it will be yet another trust and security issue with a closed proprietary unauditable product noone security minded should be using anyway, by a shit company with ties to fascist, willingly cooperating with PRISM and who knows what other programs, in a rogue state which is a part of Five Eyes.Ok so you don’t.
-
System shared this topic on
