What do you do when people don't care?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Bingo. This is the fundamental disconnect I encounter on a daily basis. All anyone wants to do is lecture me about how they are right, and I am wrong if I think different than them.
That isn't how you learn or win people over to your side. All it does is promote ignorance & alienation, and that's what we have an overabundance of in our current society.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Don't waste your energy on people who won't listen.
Look for people, places and groups that support your own beliefs.
If you can't find those people at work, then just be nice to them but not too close. Them in your free time, use your energy to support those people and groups you believe in.
Don't waste your time on those who won't listen.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I think a better question is, how do we make our elected representatives care?
(The answer, of course, is by not electing a**holes, but that's not going to happen until people really start to suffer). -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's less about valuing communication and more about the dopamine hit. Delivering that lecture and educating the simpletons feels really good.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I wish I knew. People keep telling me to "organize" and "strike". Like yeah a Walmart full of 60yo conservative white people is going to strike over this, fucking idiot.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
exclusively cishet white population
Red State? Then don't bother, nobody would care.
Look up the specific area around your workplace and trump's margin of victory, and you'll see just how fucked it is.
Preaching in a red area is a waste of time, I'm telling ya.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Idk I listen to politics lectures. It's not really the lecturer's fault he was lecturing, he was right and so he should be lecturing others on truth.
This idea that all opinions are equal are how we ended up in a post-truth world.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
All anyone wants to do is lecture me about how they are right, and I am wrong if I think different than them
The question is - are you wrong? Is your take actually valid? Based on sound imperical data? Is not fallacious? Does your reasoning stand up to scrutiny?
Ultimately you shouldn't need to be coddled if you have any allegiance to the truth.
It's one thing if a 3-year old gets 2+2 wrong. It's another when it's a 33 year old.
The unfortunate reality is that democracy as a vehicle for progress is a failure because not enough people have an allegiance to the truth, nor have the basic epistemological tools for determining what's knowledge, what's belief, what's a hypothesis, what's theory or what's evidence or any idea of what the scientific method even is.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Lecturing others anonymously online isn't exactly caring either.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You have more control over your attitude than over politics, or other peoples' opinions. Don't exhaust yourself and don't strain your relationships uselessly. They want to bring you down and push you out. I usually reject stoicism, but this is a good time to be stoic and keep your energy reserves, and your attitude, fresh.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
There a big difference in seeking something out and someone walking up to you and talking at you.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The first thing I would ask is, have you made any attempts to really understand what motivates them and why they believe as they do? Given your flippant dismissal of their belief systems, I suspect you have just mentally bucketed them and, instead of really trying to understand them, you fall back on your per-conceived notions of what you think they believe. Without that understanding, you will never be able to "make people care", because you are not treating them as fully formed people with their own beliefs and priorities. You expect that, if you just yell at them loudly enough, they will come around. They won't and, if anything, they will just dig their heels in further. To them, you're this guy:
Not everyone has the same priorities you do. What you see as "the most important thing in the world" may fall much further down the list for someone else. They may not even see it in the same framing you do. Maybe they do care about your thing, but they have their own "most important thing" and if your thing and their thing are in contention, they are going to pick their thing. This is part of the reason we have politics in the first place, once you start dealing with other people and trying to decide what and how things should be prioritized and run, you are going to run into differing beliefs and priorities. It's why most government polices generally suck and don't get everything done. Because those policies are the result of compromise between people with different and often competing priorities. And yes, it may be that some of those other priorities come from bad information, though more often they will come from radically different base beliefs. And not understanding what those beliefs actually are means that you will not have any sort of basis for convincing them of anything.
Changing peoples' minds is hard. But, it starts from a place of understanding people and not dismissing their beliefs. Step back from your outrage for a moment and try to really get in their heads. You may not agree with their position, but you need to understand how they got there before you have any chance of getting them out of it. And, maybe you can't. It may just be that they have some foundational beliefs which are completely at odds with what you want to convince them of. But, if you know and understand that, it becomes much easier to walk away from the situation and not waste time and energy on a hopeless fight. And while it feels good to yell at people, that basically never works and only serves to push them further away.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You can stop using stupid shit like "cishet white" for starters. Statistically, most people who do not care will be cishet white. Those who care, will also mostly be cishet white. With this type of exclusionary discourse bordering on racism, no one will ever listen to you because from the start, you already sound like you have nothing important to say. There's three types of people in the US: Slaves working 2 and 3 jobs to make ends meet, middle class being pit against the slaves by the third group, the capital. By using exclusionary discourse, assimilated from bougie fake activism, you're promoting infighting within the classes that should be hunting the capital like animals, the French way!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Lots of good answers here already. I'll just add that Jon Stewart recently did a great segment that touches on this. Basically, he says if everything the government does is "OmG nAzIz FaScIsTz TrAiToRz!!!" then people who aren't already paying attention will continue tuning it out. I forget at which time in the video he gets to this point, but honestly the whole 20-minute video is worth a watch.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yep. Anger and egotism are proven my studies to basically be like taking a hit of cocaine. It gets people off and they get addicted to it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Truth doesn't feel good. People want to feel good.
Psychologically it's not different than biology in the sense that people don't want to work out and eat healthy... they want to be lazy and eat energy dense food.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
By using exclusionary discourse, assimilated from bougie fake activism
This is a totally normal, relatable sentence
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I used that term to show that they are privileged folks who likely won't be directly targeted by the administration, at least at first.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Lemmy is my cocaine.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Most of the folks I talk to hear agree with me that things are going wrong, or that x,y, or z is a problem, but not enough to do anything about it. I have heard a few times that, " I want to do something, but I have to protect myself."