Who remembers this?
-
This post did not contain any content.
ITT: people telling other people they're trolling rather than accepting that humans can perceive reality differently, and the own perception is never objective.
-
I always heard yarrel. Or yarrey, but I don't hear l sound at the start or n sound in the middle. So neither?
Oh thank god, i thought i was insane for hearing yarrey
-
I remember seeing different colors on different screens, so I think part of the perception difference are the saturation and brightness settings of your screen
Yeah when I first saw the post, it was white and gold, then I read your comment and turned the brightness off my phone all the way down an now it's black and blue.
-
Yeah when I first saw the post, it was white and gold, then I read your comment and turned the brightness off my phone all the way down an now it's black and blue.
We all are black when the lights go out.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Because no one has posted the other photos:
And this is a photo of the same dress taken under proper lighting:
-
Don't forget Laurel and Yani!
I like Brainstorm vs Green Needle even better. The're not even the same amount of syllables! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1okD66RmktA
-
I like Brainstorm vs Green Needle even better. The're not even the same amount of syllables! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1okD66RmktA
Ok this one is crazy, because I hear whatever I’m consciously thinking of. “Brainstorm”, “green needle”, “brain needle”, “green storm”. It’s actually tripping me out.
Btw I still hear “laurel” every time. I can hear “yanny” in the background if I really focus, but I always hear “laurel” as well.
-
white and gold doesn't suddenly become blue and black...
This dress is blue and black
The whole argument around it is not how we perceive it but how camera perceived it in a flawed lighting condition.
That's like taking a shitty 2 Mpix photo with a potato from 2003 and truncate it to 8 bits and then claim broccoli is fucking blue because the camera had no fucking concept of a tone mapping or color temperature and captured it as blue.
Also if you put color picker on it it'll be in the white spectrum and barely register a mild hint of blue. And if the dress was blue, then you're one shitty ass photographer and has nothing to do with our actual eyes. You can make a blue dress look almost white. Anyone who ever had aquarium with beautiful metallic blue fish and used wrong lighting and turned them into bland beige silver color will know what I'm talking about.
-
I'm curious which color you perceive?
You mean which color camera perceived when the photo was taken?
-
The actual dress was in fact blue and black.
wrote last edited by [email protected]The link looks blue and black but the post still looks white and gold...
Edit: IT CHANGED TO BLACK AND BLUE WHILE I WAS LOOKING AT IT
-
Don't forget Laurel and Yani!
I hear it as "Yammi" and see the dress as light blue and gold.
Of course, both are the only objectively correct answers
-
Because no one has posted the other photos:
And this is a photo of the same dress taken under proper lighting:
Not even the brighter version looks white and gold to me. It's so obviously blue and black, y'all are insane.
-
Even more probable than perception variations is just messed up screen settings
No, two people can be looking at the same screen and perceive it differently.
-
Don't forget Laurel and Yani!
i hear Laurel at high volumes and Yanny at low volumes, and if i turn down/up the volume little by little i can hear the same one across all volumes ( brain resets after a few seconds of not listening)
-
The whole argument around it is not how we perceive it but how camera perceived it in a flawed lighting condition.
That's like taking a shitty 2 Mpix photo with a potato from 2003 and truncate it to 8 bits and then claim broccoli is fucking blue because the camera had no fucking concept of a tone mapping or color temperature and captured it as blue.
Also if you put color picker on it it'll be in the white spectrum and barely register a mild hint of blue. And if the dress was blue, then you're one shitty ass photographer and has nothing to do with our actual eyes. You can make a blue dress look almost white. Anyone who ever had aquarium with beautiful metallic blue fish and used wrong lighting and turned them into bland beige silver color will know what I'm talking about.
It's not as simple as that. There actually is a human perception element. Take a copy and ask a few people what they see. Even while you are all looking at the exact same thing, people can disagree. It can even happen to you where the colours flip.
-
The dress is a bistable picture, similar to the Spinning Dancer, which you can consciously reverse the direction of spin with some practice.
To see the dress as blue-black, I first look at the black dress in the bottom-left corner, then shift gaze to the main dress when colour is established.
To see the dress as white-gold, I first look at the sunny regions on the right, then move gaze across, when the main dress goes to white-gold.
-
It may help to cover or mask the opposite region, when focusing on one side.
-
For detail, 10 years ago I saw this as white-gold and did not change from that perception. Did not know what all the fuss was about this dress.
Today, I saw it as white-gold initially, but 10 minutes later, after two friends saw it as blue-black, I also saw it as blue-black and could not shake it.
Your comment caused me to scroll back up to try to force the white and gold (love the spinning dancer) but as soon as I got there the dress was already white and gold despite the black and blue I had initially seen.
Wild.
-
-
This post did not contain any content.
This is flicking between white and gold and black and blue each time I scroll past it.
-
Not even the brighter version looks white and gold to me. It's so obviously blue and black, y'all are insane.
I understand doubting the white but seeing black in that gold was what I could never buy. To me it seemed like light blue-grey with matte gold.
-
Because no one has posted the other photos:
And this is a photo of the same dress taken under proper lighting:
No way, really ? I really thought it was always white and gold. This cannot be the same dress, I do not trust my eyes anymore
-
I'm still convinced this is the biggest troll. It's clearly white and gold
I've always really liked this explanation image you can find on Wikipedia page for it. Essentially, people who see white and gold are mistaking the lighting to be cold and blue-tinted, rather than warm and yellow-tinted.
The portions inside the boxes are the exact same colors, you can easily check this with a color picker.
