Thoughts on bringing sportbots.xyz to Lemmy?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That sounds handy for Mastodon and annoying for Lemmy.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Why would you "not want sports in Lemmy"? Like, how is a sports community (like those that already exist on here) hurting you?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Something like that going to relevant communities and only posting more popular things might work. I don’t want to see every Adam Schefter post in c/NFL, for example. I guess to some extent we could rely on the sorting algorithms to keep the communities from getting flooded, but it still could start drowning out the experience.
OP, maybe somebody at https://fanaticus.social/ would be interested in hosting these? It seems like their goal is to become Lemmy’s sports home.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Reposting based on a signal sounds like the best idea.
Because we kinda have the alternative in place: lemmit chose the way of replicating reddit posts onto a committed instance. That means that someone still has to manually go, look at - for example the F1 - lemmit, choose an interesting post there and cross-post it to the relevant lemmy community.
If the repost into a relevant lemmy community happened automatically based on a signal, that would take off work from users.
Could that signal be the number of interactions in activitypub for a sportsbots post? Or would it be the Twitter interactions?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
fanaticus.social seems a bit zombified. Instance hasn't been updated since 0.19.3, last I checked the admin hasn't been active for months and the baseball communities (which were in the beginning the most active) were pretty much silent the whole season.
I have a handful of sports-focused instances which would surely benefit from this:
- [email protected] (and communities for every NBA team)
- [email protected] (and for the teams)
- [email protected] (and the main leagues/biggest clubs)
- [email protected]
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
There's no lack of dead sports communities around. Turning them into dead sport bot communities doesn't sound like it would help. Sports fans aren't going to show up for that.
Going through the effort of manually posting screenshots in the sports communities would go way farther than getting a bot to cross post.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Going through the effort of manually posting screenshots in the sports communities would go way farther than getting a bot to cross post.
Sorry, this is a bit condescending.
Go take a look at my profile. I have almost 2000 posts already. I've been posting 10-20 posts every day to all the different sport communities. Do you think that dedicating a good half-hour every day to read a bunch of feeds and sharing them is not already enough effort?
I'm not saying that we should rely only on mirror accounts, but I'm saying that it makes no sense to ignore them. I'm not proposing to take just a random army of AI slop and put it here. I'm saying that we can look at the places where the content curation already has been made and replicate it here.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I have almost 2000 posts already.
FYI, I see indeed 1.43k posts on your https://communick.news/u/rglullis, but https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/[email protected] only shows 597. SJW shows 617: https://sh.itjust.works/u/[email protected]
So not sure where you posted the missing ones, but it seems like it was on communities that large instances do not follow.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Ok, I have 1.92k comments, not posts.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
- [email protected]
- [email protected], with an impressive 66 comments post 4 days ago: https://lemmy.world/post/25015517
- [email protected] has 10 comments on their last posts
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Keep pushing/promoting the LW communities...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Why is the burden on the other users to block your Twitter bots?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Because it's their responsibility to curate their own feeds.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yes but those are a part of social media.
Content you dont like posted by people here on social media is not equivalent to botspam. -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
"Botspam" is when you have someone mass sending programs sending messages that do not enrich the content of the network. A bot that is mirroring perfectly good accounts from other platforms is far from the case.
Put another way: if the content is relevant to the point where part of the people want to have it, and if the content being mirrored has a proper context for some members of the community, then we shouldn't count it as spam.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I think Blaze's point still is relevant: if you are posting a lot on communities that large instances dont even know about, then your efforts will be harder. Ideally one could change something about that, for example use a user account on such a big instance to pull in those communities into federation.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
We locked and migrated [email protected] to [email protected], so not sure what you mean?
I'm not active on the two others, but just noted that the LW versions are active
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'm already dealing with more than 15 topic-specific instances, some of them with multiple communities, plus Communick. If I try to keep track of "who-is-following-what", I will go insane. I'd rather believe that eventually more people get to learn about these instances and start contributing as well.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Seems a lot. I already feel like I stretch myself too thin sometimes, and I'm just a poster, not an admin of 15 instances.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If you intend to create inorganic content like that maybe the best solution would be a dedicated community so that folks who are happy to have updates and be able to discuss with folks can go there, and other folks can avoid it
I get that's not what you wanna discuss, but as I think you can see that's pretty important to the culture of this space for a lot of people, and anything you build will be more successful if you're mindful of that human aspect. It's at least as important as any technical choice, if not more
(Overlooking the human or social considerations for purely technical ones is a open source community pet-peeve of mine. Everything here is intrinsically collaborative and needs to be pro-social to truly succeed.)