'Every word has come back to haunt me': China cracks down on women who write gay erotica
-
That's not illegalizing it & it's not throwing erotica writers in jail.
Don't believe me?
Cite the laws.
It's legal.So if it's prohibited by a law then it's not illegal?
-
So if it's prohibited by a law then it's not illegal?
So if it’s prohibited by a law
Again, it's not.
Again, cite a law. -
deleted by creator
Move the goalpost much? The US is in “the west” and they consistently set the tone and run the show. Welcome to geopolitics hope you enjoy your stay!
-
Weirdly they are more progressive when it comes to prostitution; prostitution isnt illegal, but soliciting it is.
so, the Nordic model? how is it progressive to criminalize human functions?
-
Yeah porn is so empowering.. Very progressive
you fucking idiot
-
Really? I see 95% of the comments saying it's China fucking up and they don't like it.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Most upvoted comment: Attacking the source - Defending
2nd: No proof, but it's serious so people wouldn't lie - Benefit of the Doubt
3rd: "Rare China L" - Criticizing
4th: Attacking source, attacking extent - Defending
5th: "If it is happening it's probably because of taxes or some legit reason" - Defending
6th: "Making porn is illegal" - Defending
7th: "The whole thing smells a little fishy" - Defending
8th: Attacking source, 'not inclined to believe it' - Defending
9th: An author in another country wrote some pedophilic, this is probably the same - Defending
10th: Boo - Criticizing
11th: 'porn struggle session' - Unknown what way the comment leans.
12th: A quote from another article - Looks Criticizing
13th and least upvoted: "Hexbear users claim to unconditionally support queer rights and then try to run defence for this shit." - Criticizing
Defending: 7
Critic: 4 (maybe +2)Where are you getting 95% from?
-
Can't expect much from .world with such things.
And you can expect better from a .ml?
You're siding with a tankie over an anarchist here btw.
-
so, the Nordic model? how is it progressive to criminalize human functions?
Yes, the model common to the Nordic, Vietnam, Cuba, etc.
Not criminalizing solicitation or brothels increases the number of prostitutes who end up working under coercive conditions.
-
"I've been warned not to talk about it," the woman wrote, before revealing snippets of the day she says she was arrested for publishing gay erotica.
"I'll never forget it - being escorted to the car in full view, enduring the humiliation of stripping naked for examination in front of strangers, putting on a vest for photos, sitting in the chair, shaking with fear, my heart pounding."
The handle, Pingping Anan Yongfu, is among at least 8 in recent months which have shared accounts on Chinese social media platform Weibo of being arrested for publishing gay erotic fiction. As authors recounted their experiences, dozens of lawyers offered pro bono help.
At least 30 writers, nearly all of them women in their 20s, have been arrested across the country since February, a lawyer defending one told the BBC. Many are out on bail or awaiting trial, but some are still in custody. Another lawyer told the BBC that many more contributors were summoned for questioning.
and here's why the BBC is blocked in Vietnam
-
Yeah porn is so empowering.. Very progressive
-
My state literally made pornhub illegal today
They did not.
Words mean things.
Answered here.
Cite the law: you can't.please stop doing apologia and/or propaganda
Right back at you: twisting the word illegal.
I disapprove of the dumb online ID regulations, too: still not illegal.
US isn't throwing pornographers & erotica writers in jail.China has always banned porn
You said it.
Not banned in USA.You’re welcome to sleepwalk into authoritarianism
Chinese government is already there.
US still has a long way to "catch up".
They're not- sending Ughyers to reeducation camps or forced sterilizations
- organ harvesting the Falun Gong
- suppressing discussion of the times they've sent tanks against civilians.
The Chinese government doesn't care about individual rights & never has: it's baked into the formula.
They always put tankie ideology first, the individual later, sometimes far later.Oh so youre actually just a propagandist, damn okay then. Im not engaging with you on made up terms and a belief that time doesn't move forward. I hope you get clowned in the debrief for this dogshit agitprop.
-
Oh so youre actually just a propagandist, damn okay then. Im not engaging with you on made up terms and a belief that time doesn't move forward. I hope you get clowned in the debrief for this dogshit agitprop.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]still not citing a single law to prove porn is illegal
Im not engaging with you
Good thinking bailing now: looks like someone knows when they're beat.
It would be incredibly easy to prove me wrong if your claim were true, yet you don't.
Not hard to figure out why.I know facts don't support my argument, so I'll evade by calling them a propagandist & hope no one notices
You basically: just because facts are inconvenient to your argument doesn't mean it's valid to ignore them, pretend they're "propaganda", or evade with irrelevant claims.
So, cool fallacies & evasion, bro.
You're
ing yourself right here.Next time, try logic.
