Trump rescinds protections on 59m acres of national forest to allow logging
-
I have no idea how big an acre or a hectare is, I have no idea who the people the article is referring to are. I see 0 mentions of the effects this will have on global climate. All hallmarks of a US centric article. This is not world news and it clearly caters to American interests.
Edit: I’d love to read an article about the global ramifications of this on the whole planet in its entirety, but I’m not too keen on reading about governor XYZ of state UVW bashing republicans and The Congress.
That’s internal US politics that I have no interest in starting my day with.
That’s internal US politics that I have no interest in starting my day with.
The exposition that you've latched onto is typical of news articles everywhere. As with countless others, the article conveys more than that. You don't have to value the exposition. The headline conveniently gives you all you need in order to decide whether to skip it.
The news here is that a significant portion of the world's trees, upon which we all depend, are being put on the chopping block. I consider that world news, just as I do when Brazil does it.
-
This is not world news.
I think any single nation making big environment and climate wrecking moves should count.
-
The community rules state no internal US news. Plain and simple.
internal news would be 'so and so won the lottery' or 'city eminate domains affordable housing for shopping center'
-
internal news would be 'so and so won the lottery' or 'city eminate domains affordable housing for shopping center'
No, internal news would be "US cuts down forest in the US" which has absolutely no impact on the world at all. No other country is involved. Just the US. Meaning this is internal US news.
-
I have no idea how big an acre or a hectare is, I have no idea who the people the article is referring to are. I see 0 mentions of the effects this will have on global climate. All hallmarks of a US centric article. This is not world news and it clearly caters to American interests.
Edit: I’d love to read an article about the global ramifications of this on the whole planet in its entirety, but I’m not too keen on reading about governor XYZ of state UVW bashing republicans and The Congress.
That’s internal US politics that I have no interest in starting my day with.
Its pretty easy to search a conversion. 58m acres is about the size of the entire UK.
-
I have no idea how big an acre or a hectare is, I have no idea who the people the article is referring to are. I see 0 mentions of the effects this will have on global climate. All hallmarks of a US centric article. This is not world news and it clearly caters to American interests.
Edit: I’d love to read an article about the global ramifications of this on the whole planet in its entirety, but I’m not too keen on reading about governor XYZ of state UVW bashing republicans and The Congress.
That’s internal US politics that I have no interest in starting my day with.
If you don't even know how big an acre or hectare is, you are either very young or you missed basic schooling.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
And, again, World is not for US News.
