Steam is cracking down on porn games, to keep Payment Processors happy.
-
Incest tales: Sister and Mom is my favorite.
What’s next, loli hentai?
-
Incest tales: Sister and Mom is my favorite.
What’s next, loli hentai?
Nah, too many politicians like those for them to get banned.
-
wrote last edited by [email protected]
If the US used something like pix, MasterCard, visa, etc, wouldn't have any power to do this, but they want to make Brazil delete pix from existence. Interesting.
Edit: grammar
-
It's only a matter of time before they come for furry stuff. They did it with fansly. It's apparently "simulated bestiality" and from what I've heard you aren't even allowed to reference trans puppy girls, pup play, etc without getting banned.
Good. That shit is vile.
-
What happens when someone bought these games. Do they get deleted from their computers and/or from their accounts? Do they get reimbursed?
-
I don't mind these games existing, but I'm also not going to be too sad if they leave steam, ngl.
-
Nah, too many politicians like those for them to get banned.
Nah nah, it's going to get banned, because the politicians dont need to pretend with virtual lolis /s/
-
Good. That shit is vile.
Oh let people enjoy stuff you don't agree with
-
If the US used something like pix, MasterCard, visa, etc, wouldn't have any power to do this, but they want to make Brazil delete pix from existence. Interesting.
Edit: grammar
But how could the poor little multi billon dollar multinational companies keep thier bully monopolies if they have competent competition /sarcasm/
-
Good. That shit is vile.
Hey, no kink shaming!
What happens between two (or more) consenting adults that isn't causing harm to others is none of your business.
Don't like it? Don't do it or watch it or play games themed around it.
And don't be a sad individual who is only able to get joy from shitting on things others like. Because that life only ends in you dying miserable and alone, with nobody to mourn your passing and the last time your name is spoken being by the priest who rushes through a form-letter eulogy to get you sent off to the beyond as quick as possible.
-
Ted Cruz in shambles
-
Good. That shit is vile.
You don’t have to like it, I’m certainly not into it. Still failing to see how it not being for you justifies puritanical bans
-
It's only a matter of time before they come for furry stuff. They did it with fansly. It's apparently "simulated bestiality" and from what I've heard you aren't even allowed to reference trans puppy girls, pup play, etc without getting banned.
Wait, puppy play would get you banned? Isn't that just, like, wearing funny ears and walking around on hands and knees or whatever? Maybe at most a tail buttplug? I don't really get the appeal myself, but it seems pretty damn benign.
-
Payment platforms have problems with incest and furry content from the looks of that list.
-
Ted Cruz in shambles
No worries, Sex With Hitler is still available for purchase.
-
Hey, no kink shaming!
What happens between two (or more) consenting adults that isn't causing harm to others is none of your business.
Don't like it? Don't do it or watch it or play games themed around it.
And don't be a sad individual who is only able to get joy from shitting on things others like. Because that life only ends in you dying miserable and alone, with nobody to mourn your passing and the last time your name is spoken being by the priest who rushes through a form-letter eulogy to get you sent off to the beyond as quick as possible.
It does extend to others since they put animated, innocent "kid-friendly" looking porn on imageboards.
And yes it's akin to beastialty which is vile. Why else would you dress up like an animal?
-
Oh let people enjoy stuff you don't agree with
Sure. You like beastialty too?
-
This might sound like a good idea. But it is not, since lets say some topic is too sensitive for the payment processor, then they have monopoly on what game can and can not be allowed on Steam.
So in the long run, this is a bad idea.
-
You don’t have to like it, I’m certainly not into it. Still failing to see how it not being for you justifies puritanical bans
It's not puritanical when the subject hints at beastialty. If you want to fuck animals, seek help.
-
It's not puritanical when the subject hints at beastialty. If you want to fuck animals, seek help.
Does a diaper wearing fetish predispose someone to pedophilia? This reeks of slippery slope fallacy
