X expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunch
-
You can sue for anything.
-
Maybe both at the same time. It's possible to do two things.
-
Nazi vs Nestle. Always win for us.
-
Organizing on Facebook? Wtaf.
-
Paying a couple of five or six figure sums to continue advertising on X, versus paying millions to fight a protracted legal battle - I know which option the shareholders of those companies will be pushing for.
-
This donkey about to get taught a lesson by nestle. He probably thinks he's hot shit now but he poked the devil.
-
-
Sure thing! I found an article that explains it better than I could:
-
let them fight.jpg
-
tHe mArKeT WiLl ReGuLaTe ItSeLf!
-
-
-
-
They needn't to do so. His children are dead to him.
-
Oh man. I wish OP would have posted this first.
-
Here's the claim from the article:
The complaint alleges that the WFA “organized an advertiser boycott of Twitter through GARM, with the goal of coercing Twitter to comply with the GARM Brand Safety Standards to the satisfaction of GARM.” And it claims that these efforts succeeded in harming Twitter/X, with “at least” 18 GARM-affiliated advertisers stopping their purchase of ads on Twitter between November and December 2022, and other advertisers “substantially” reducing their spending.
-
-
"I'm in a government that condones - if not encourages - businesses from rejecting customers based on their own ideology, but don't do it to me!"
-
-
