X expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunch
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
They're only neutral in world wars
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
They can peg eachother. "Ass to ass!"
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yes but this all happened before he even went full mask off.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yes it absolutely did, but the platform was not run responsibly, and contained hate speech. Musk even claimed the Nazi content besides adverts was a rare fluke.
Which is obvious today is not true. What Musk may really want, is to normalize Nazi content. -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
What an ugly fuck Elon is. Ewwww
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If suing companies for not advertising on your platform made any sense, porn sites could sue almost the whole economy.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
What does any screaming toddler in the toy aisle expect to gain?
-
Unfortunately he sued in the North District of Texas, which is a maga kangaroo court
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Currently scheduled for 18th of March.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Ah, evil vs evil eats popcorn
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
YouTube 10 years ago: we’re becoming as straight-edged as possible to keep advertisers around
Twitter now: Fuck you (wait we needed you)
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Let me ask you this: how many ads have you run on Twitter? Does that strike you as fair?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Laws introduced to prevent people from boycotting israeli companies allow Musk to sueanyone who won't advertise on X for political reasons.
And no, the first amendment doesn't protect speech for private companies.
He'll win.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's worse for him if they are kept alive because it's a public reminder how much they hate him. Nestle starting shipping his kids the good food reserved for the lizard people only
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah any judge should have just waited for a paternity test.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
No he won't.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The legal system is essentially purchased at this point (remember everyone gloating about how the Onion bought InfoWars?)
There’s a chance he might find a toadie judge and get something out of this. Or at least be obnoxious enough that others might preemptively comply with something.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
i don't understand how it's a boycott
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Criminal contempt of business model