X expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunch
-
-
a certain amount of business collusion can be considered a cartel (other kind) and essentially monopolistic… but that’s usually price fixing… i don’t see how they could be compelled to advertise on a nazi platform.
also, i respect these companies much more than any company that would, and consider this lawsuit great advertising
but then again, the right trump appointed federal judge makes meaning pointless in law… -
Surely it's up to the advertisers to choose where who they pay money to use?
-
-
-
when advertisers do what he tells them
They have actually ... themselves?
-
-
-
Yeah like x = y, not generic at all
Also it won't censor "bla bla x." -
-
That has always been the essence of the "Free Market", for thee but not for me.
-
Boycotts are absolutely legal, you are completely entitled to decide who you don't want to do business with. However, illegality is no longer required for the justice system to be weaponized against you, and President Musk just wants to make an example to others who might not want to do business with an actual Nazi.
-
*corpussy
-
-
Oh of course I agree. That's just what the nestle asshole said.
That's good. Boycotts can be effective!
-
The law doesn't matter. With Musk's position in the government this will basically end up as extortion: Settle or we'll make things difficult for you.
-
Can Elon and Yaccarino just die already
-
How dare your company not advertise on my company cause I’m a racist wanna be nazi twat.
-
"Free market" was nothing but a propaganda term...
-
"^X .*$"
